creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Connie Schultz icon
Connie Schultz
23 May 2012
Catholic Leaders Must Dial Down the Rhetoric

As a non-Catholic, I wrestled with an internal conflict over the birth control battle of the bishops. Part of … Read More.

16 May 2012
Dear Young Mothers: Ignore Time Magazine

In February 1989, I ended a phone interview for a magazine story I was writing and looked up to find my 21-month-… Read More.

9 May 2012
Finally, the President Says 'I Do'

This was going to be a different kind of column. My friend Jackie, through a mutual contact, arranged for me … Read More.

It's About Rights, Not Warfare

Share Comment

If you work for somebody else for a living and you resent unions, the solution for what ails you isn't to derail the hard-earned gains of organized labor.

What you need to do is to join a union so that you, too, will be treated with the fairness and respect every hardworking human being deserves.

Full disclosure: I am the direct beneficiary of organized labor — as a child and now as a journalist.

My father was a member of Local 270 of the Utility Workers for nearly 50 years. His wages and benefits kept me breathing through chronic asthma and sent me to college. Now I'm a dues-paying member of The Newspaper Guild, Local 1, and the Communications Workers of America.

My union membership means I could lose my column over my opinions, but not my job. Mighty emboldening for a liberal woman spouting off in America's heartland.

Public union employees are fighting for their working lives in Ohio, Wisconsin, Indiana and New Jersey. The battle is over their right to collectively bargain with their employers for wages and benefits, which is why unions exist.

Conservative legislators in these states are trying to obliterate public employee unions, and they're using the most cynical of strategies: Turn workers against workers — union vs. nonunion — and then maybe no one will notice the ever-widening abyss between the minute percent of the wealthiest Americans and everybody else.

So far, the biggest pro-union demonstrations have been in Madison, Wis. Even those unions exempted from proposed cuts — firefighters and policemen, who endorsed Gov. Scott Walker during his 2010 campaign — have shown up en masse to support other public workers.

Conservatives have their supporters, too.

"Wisconsin is ground zero," said Tim Phillips, president of Americans for Prosperity, a tea party faction. "I think it is going to determine largely whether the pampered nature of these public employees is finally reined in."

New York Times reporter Eric Lipton pointed out what Phillips forgot to say:

"What Mr.

Phillips did not mention was that his Virginia-based nonprofit group, whose budget surged to $40 million in 2010 from $7 million three years ago, was created and financed in part by the secretive billionaire brothers Charles G. and David H. Koch.

"State records also show that Koch Industries, their energy and consumer products conglomerate based in Wichita, Kan., was one of the biggest contributors to the election campaign of Gov. Scott Walker of Wisconsin, a Republican who has championed the proposed cuts."

As for Phillips' claim of "pampered" public employees, various studies, including one by University of Wisconsin economics professors Keith Bender and John Heywood, found that state and local employees' wages and salaries are, on average, 6.8 percent lower than those for private-sector workers of equal education.

The professors also found that public employees' earnings have been in relative decline for 20 years.

Still, no one, including union workers, is saying concessions should not be made. Unions have been making concessions for some time now, including where I work. Guild members are in our second year of voluntary pay cuts, and I've not heard a single colleague suggest we should stop sharing the burden.

That's the thing about those so-called "pampered" union workers. They don't exist. But the mythology comes in handy when you're looking to redirect the blame for these tough economic times.

A wise man once said: "The working classes didn't bring this on. It was the big boys that thought the financial drunk was going to last forever and over-bought, over-merged and over-capitalized."

That came from Will Rogers in 1931.

Today he'd be accused of engaging in class warfare.

I am reminded of the union mantra: They only call it class warfare when we fight back.

Connie Schultz is a Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist for The Plain Dealer in Cleveland and an essayist for Parade magazine. To find out more about Connie Schultz (cschultz@plaind.com) and read her past columns, please visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2011 CREATORS.COM


Comments

6 Comments | Post Comment
My problem with teacher's unions is that they protect the truly horrid teachers, which preventing the really great teachers from getting any reward for their talent and hard work. Everyone just gets about the same. Where is the incentive for our best & brightest to go into teaching? These are the people who our children are spending 8 hours a day with! How much damage does a truly bad, uncaring teacher do? And don't tell me they're not there - - I had some really AWFUL ones. I also got through subjects like Calculus with an A on my report card, only to have to drop Calculus 1 in my first semester of college because I couldn't even keep up with the first week of classwork (and the whole course was supposed to just be a repeat of my high school class!).

I do understand the need for some sort of protection against the stupid lawsuits, etc. etc. that our teachers are subject to. My friends who teach have shared stories of parents who won't lift a finger to help with the academic process, yet are ready to cry racism or whatever else comes to mind when their precious progeny is awarded a D in class. But can't we come up with a way to protect our teachers from these people while also instituting some kind of merit pay? Perhaps not WHAT the students scored on their standardized tests at the end of the class, but rather HOW MUCH they improved. So regardless of how low the students started, that teacher would always have the opportunity to succeed and score some extra merit pay.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Kim
Wed Feb 23, 2011 2:09 PM
Re: Kim
I'm right there with you, Kim. Its seemed like I had either really good teachers or people just hanging out. I don't think I had anyone who was just average.

AFTA (I think that's the right acronym) which is one of the larger teachers' unions believes what you do. Their policy is that a bad teacher makes the next teacher's job that much harder. . .if the 4th grade teacher doesn't do his/her job, then the 5th grade teacher has to pick up the slack. And that's not fair to the kids or the 5th grade teacher. One of the things they advocate is group merit pay. . . to encourage good teachers working together. 1) They share best practices and 2) they'll work together to get bad teachers out of the system sooner.

Comment: #2
Posted by: capiscan
Wed Feb 23, 2011 2:34 PM
I agree with Kim and capiscan but remain doubtful about these solutions. "Best practices" often turns into sharing lesson plans My young daughter has done the "Hundred Day" thing three times, and she is only 7. Pre-school, Kindergarten, and first grade. A redundant "celebration" of the mundane.

Sometimes the Instructional Specialist can't teach a lick, you can tell by the way the meeting is run. Once I sat through a dreadfully pedantic lecture by a favored "mentor". On the first day of school this "mentor" wasted the first hour of school leading a tour of the building; "This is the office and that is the nurse's office" - to 26 already bored kids who had attended that school for 5 previous years. Subbing for a Jr. High class once I was told that they had been on the same chapter of a science book for 3 weeks. I watched 8th grade teachers argue over who would teach math next term. Utter lack of confidence in learning and teaching abilities on display, I mean 8th grade math is not yet rocket science. My 7th grader took a woodworking class - how fun - and spent the first two weeks watching safety videos. 14 forty-five minute classes shot to death there.

Fear of learning and teaching may be a trickle down effect, but it is out there. Good teachers are busy preparing and keeping students interested and on task. They have no time to schmooze and won't be asked to "mentor" anybody. High stakes testing is a game played by politicians and State Superintendants to little effect or purpose, it only makes newspaper editors happy.

It is remarkable that most kids come out in pretty good shape. They are kind, smart, and creative. No one has noticed becuse malleability is more prized.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Tom
Thu Feb 24, 2011 5:21 AM
I AM a teacher, and have been one for more than 40 years. I've seen far more good teachers than I have bad. I will tell you what I have seen, though. I've seen parents who want me to do their job for them. I've seen Boards of Education which contained citizens who could put their knowledge of education principles and practices in an eye dropper and still have room for Visene. I've seen administratiors who re-arranged student schedules so that they could filre a teacher that they did not like. I've seen college professors, Phd's who had never taught a class telling me how to do the job that they could not do. I've seen parents campaign to get a teacher fired because he or she had the temerity to discipline their "darling".
Throughout all of this, I persevered, did my job, counseled the kids with emotional problems, wrote the letters of recommendation to get them into college, managed to send my own children to college through loans that it took me ten years to repay, borrowed more money to go to graduate school so as to keep my license valid.
Granted, that the union pendulum has swung too far to the left. Granted that the public sector unions need to be curbed. However, you who are so vengeful may be throwing the baby out with the bath water. Keep what is needed, eliminate what is not, learn the difference between the two, and control your passions.
Comment: #4
Posted by: Jobe
Thu Feb 24, 2011 8:59 AM
Oh Ms Schultz for someone who's eduated why do you write these things. The fact that Unions help or in many cases are not good (like their entanglement with organized crime) is not what is horribly wrong with what is going on in Wisconsin.

The citizens who elected their representatives ARE NOW disenfrancised because of 14 Democrats who are stopping the legal democratic process from taking place in Madison. No matter how you try to distract from this MOST important attribute of what it means to be an Ametrican Citizen. I can only think that YOU do not care that hundred of thousands of servicemen gave their lives so we CAN VOTE. And you should be ashamed to write that Unions are more important than our RIGHT TO VOTE. The representatives were elected and you think its ok for Unions to block the democratic process where our representatives make new laws. I was against ObamaCare because of its intrusion into our lives. I had to wait 2 YEARS to get rid of those representives who voted for it. TWO YEARS. The democratic systems works, but for some reason you think its ok for Unions to STOP the process and disenfranchised the voters in Wisconsin. Shame on you.

Comment: #5
Posted by: john matthew
Thu Feb 24, 2011 1:14 PM
Connie:
I think you have misconstrued the argument. I have been a member of many unions over the years; UAW, USW, UMW, and URW to name a few. These are all private sector unions as is your own CWA. The situation in Wisconsin and other places is not about the rights of private sector unions. The debate in Wisconsin and other places is about public sector unions. What you did not mention in your artcile is the fact that public sector unions live off the taxpayer. Governments do not create wealth Connie. They collect taxpayer money. What is happening is that citizens are waking up to the fact that they are the boss, not government and certainly not union leaders. Public sector union members have no divine right to insist that taxpayers continue to pay their wages and benefits at unsustainable levels. When citizens say enough is enough they mean it. There isn't going to be a "rolling over" and playing dead this time. It is time to establish a new relationship with teachers that does not include unionism and the incestuous relationship between it and government. The only way to do that is to elect people like Scott Walker who will pledge to return fiscal sanity to state governments.
Mike
Comment: #6
Posted by: Mike Spaulding
Fri Feb 25, 2011 4:54 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Connie Schultz
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

3 Feb 2010 A Conservative Darling Loses His Charm

30 Nov 2011 Homeless Children and Millionaire Coaches

30 Jun 2010 Every College Student Should Own a Passport