creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Connie Schultz icon
Connie Schultz
8 Feb 2012
Funny Man, Karl Rove

After I saw the new Chrysler ad — starring Clint Eastwood and titled "Halftime in America" … Read More.

1 Feb 2012
Komen Caves, Women Pay

The Susan G. Komen for the Cure foundation has severed its ties with Planned Parenthood. As a result, … Read More.

25 Jan 2012
Answer the Question, Candidate Gingrich

You may have noticed that most of the presidential debates are moderated by men, which gives female … Read More.

In America, Blame the Babies

Share Comment

They call them "anchor babies."

Not "God's children," you understand. There'll be no celebrating these infants as the joyful proof that each was "a baby, not a choice." These precious little faces will not be smiling from a right-to-life billboard any time soon.

No, these are bad babies, the ones born in America to undocumented immigrants. You may remember how Lou Dobbs, before he left CNN last year, used to call them "anchor babies" as a way to promote his dastardly version of America.

In Dobbs' world, hundreds of thousands of immigrant mothers, heavy with child, were navigating rivers and deserts, outwitting U.S. agents and dodging gun-wielding vigilantes so they could heave themselves upon America's shores and head for the nearest emergency room. Just in the nick of time, they'd deliver babies who would take their first breaths as Americans — and later make their parents citizens, too.

Arizona state Sen. Russell Pearce — chief sponsor of his state's controversial new immigration law, which recently was gutted by a federal judge — loves the "anchor child" theory. Makes misogyny so much more palatable.

"They use it as a wedge," Pearce told Time magazine. "This is an orchestrated effort by them to come here and have children to gain access to the great welfare state we've created."

Or, as California anti-immigration activist Barbara Coe told the Los Angeles Times, "it's invasion by birth canal."

A Google search for "anchor babies" produces about 331,000 links. Scroll through them and you'll notice the epithet is increasingly free of quotation marks, which suggests the effort to dehumanize the smallest of humans is catching on.

Last week, U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said he was thinking of introducing a constitutional amendment that would change the law that grants citizenship to immigrants' children born in America. He had such an interesting way of putting it, too:

"People come here to have babies," he said.

"They come here to drop a child. It's called 'drop and leave.' To have a child in America, they cross the border, they go to the emergency room, have a child, and that child's automatically an American citizen. That shouldn't be the case. That attracts people here for all the wrong reasons."

I have lived for more than a half-century, and I have yet to meet a mother anywhere in the world who would describe the excruciating miracle of birth as "dropping" a baby. But let's face it: You can't go after a baby unless you take down the mother, too. Feels so American, in that far-righty kind of way.

There are numerous factual responses to this latest round of Hate the Immigrant.

Many studies show that the number of immigrants' children conceived to game the system is mighty small and that most parents cross the border for jobs and to reunite with families.

The Pew Hispanic Center reports that Mexican emigration to America has declined steadily — from 605,000 in 2000 to 175,000 in 2008. To further shake the baby's rattle, Pew used 2008 Census Bureau data to estimate that undocumented immigrants are only 4 percent of our country's population and just 5.4 percent of our work force. Immigrants' children who were born in America make up a whopping 6.8 percent of elementary and secondary schools.

We also should review the pesky rules for immigrant parents' citizenship. Every immigrant's American child must turn 21 before sponsoring Mom or Dad. That's two decades plus one year before parents can even apply. If the parents haven't lived legally in the U.S. for at least the previous year, they have to go back to their home country and wait 10 years to try again.

Conservative, self-declared patriots insist that carrying a pregnancy to term is a woman's God-given obligation but then attempt to defile an entire population of innocent newborns as tools of trickery.

Deport these newborns! they say. Banish these babies!

What God are these people praying to? What version of Jesus have they conjured up to demonize innocent children?

No one chooses to be born in America.

But everyone who is has the constitutional right to call this country home.

Connie Schultz is a Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist for The Plain Dealer in Cleveland and an essayist for Parade magazine. To find out more about Connie Schultz (cschultz@plaind.com) and read her past columns, please visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM


Comments

16 Comments | Post Comment
I don't hate immigrants. Immigrants are people who folled the law of Our Country and swore an oath to renounce allegience to their former country and became Citizens of the United States. I am anti illegal criminal invasion without hating the invaders. Big, big difference. Your slant on "anchor babies" tugs heartstrings but, misses the point. The Constitution of The United States is for United States Citizens. People who circumvent the law, and their enabler like you are definitly anti-United States.
Comment: #1
Posted by: David Henricks
Wed Aug 4, 2010 4:11 AM
We can justify anything and not even see our hypocrisy. Thanks for pointing the light at it. Good column.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Leslie Eppler
Wed Aug 4, 2010 5:44 AM
This is a wonderful article and makes a great point. Let's hope it gets through to people who want to blame innocent children that surely did not choose to be in their situation. I mean really, who wants to grow up worrying that one day their parents are going to be gone?
Comment: #3
Posted by: K
Wed Aug 4, 2010 7:43 AM
Many of the people who have wrecked our economy--and who feel they deserve even more than they already have--are waving wedge issues madly in front of the voters, hoping they can get us to fight each other instead of claiming our country back. I hope they fail. Think very hard, when someone is pushing hate and division--think about what they have to gain and what the rest of us have to lose. Don't get fooled into voting against your own interests on the basis of lies about immigrants, minorities, unemployed people, old people, or any other "divide and conquer scheme."

This anchor babies accusation is a typical ploy. Don't fall for it.
Comment: #4
Posted by:
Wed Aug 4, 2010 3:31 PM
You must be joking. Yes, these are 'anchor babies', and their parents are taking advantage of stupid liberal bleeding hearts.
Comment: #5
Posted by: Nancy
Thu Aug 5, 2010 2:56 AM
I don't blame the babies, I blame our government for allowing babies to become citizens just because they are born here. I also blame the mothers and fathers of the child. What pregnant woman in here right mind, if she had the interest of her baby at heart, would take the chance of walking across a river and desert with the chance of going into early labor? The mothers wouldn't be coming here to have "their" babies if they didn't get free food, money, medical and schooling, a chance to become a legal citizen, etc. I know of no other country that you can go and your child automatically becomes a citizen just because he/she was born there. If I went to Mexico and had to go to the hospital to have a baby my child wouldn't become a mexican. I'm pretty sure they would make me pay the hopital or doctor bill too. By the way, if the mother and father get a job here and they're here illegally, are they paying taxes like I do? It is my taxes that are paying for their babies to be born and schooled and fed. I think the people who pay taxes should have a say. Maybe all the people in favor of paying for these women to have their babies here should start taking a percentage out of "their" own pocket to pay for them. Leave my hard earned money to alone.
Comment: #6
Posted by: seasiren2
Thu Aug 5, 2010 5:53 AM
I don't blame the babies. I blame our government for allowing the babies to become legal citizens just because they were born here. I blame the mother and the father. What parent in their right mind would risk walking across a river and desert. What if she went into early labor, got dehydrated or passed out in the heat or freezing cold? What would happen to the child and mother then? If I went down to Mexico and had a baby it would not become a Mexican. They would not let me walk away without paying the hospital bill or doctors bill. I am tired of my taxes going to pay for "anchor babies" and illegal children being schooled and fed. The mothers wouldn't be coming here if they new their children wouldn't be getting a free education with meals, free medical, etc. What about the parents of the "new" citizens, are they working? If they are, how are they paying taxes since they are here illegally? How about we stop using "our" tax dollars to fund any programs that go to anchor babies and illegals. Instead, anyone who feels so sorry for these anchor babies and thinks they should be made welcome here give 10% of "their" own pay check to a fund to fund the hospital and schools so they can stay. I think that would be more fair. That way the people against it can't complain their money is being spent on something they don't like and the people who just love illegals get their way too. But remember YOU, who love them get to pay for them, not me.
Comment: #7
Posted by: seasiren2
Thu Aug 5, 2010 6:11 AM
The Left and Right need to get their head out of their rear-ends.

The issue here is simple: Current interpretation of the 14th amendment and immigration law creates an incentive for a mother to cross the border to have a child. We hear how dangerous making the crossing can be and some mothers do not survice the attempt, or are harmed in some way. I don't care if it's just a few or many, the point is the incentive needs to be removed. Fighting over which side is the less humane or more political, or making up BS about the Right's "Immigrant Hate" will not change the fact that the incentive is there, it is harmful, and it needs to be removed.
Comment: #8
Posted by: JosephS
Thu Aug 5, 2010 6:26 AM
We are a nation of immigrants--give the babies to loving, caring people. Immigrants make our world a bettter place by paying taxes- doing work that no one else has the courage to do...like being exposed to hazardous chemicals and pesticides for the farm workers..getting less pay, no benefits, sometimes not getting paid or having any recourse to do something about it..in addition, having to worry about your children being fed and being treated like garbage by hostile folk, who would probably understand- if the flames of hate weren't being fanned by hatefilled people..! I admire immigrants very much-legal and illegal very much...I am so sorry this is being used as a political football right now..!
Comment: #9
Posted by: Ronna Sommers
Thu Aug 5, 2010 10:06 AM
I don't care if my taxes go to help people....! I am sick to death of my taxes going to support WAR...If churches want to have an outcome in elections, I would contribute money for whoever would be against that---Churches should start paying taxes---it is not right that mega-churches try to influence from the pulpit---SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE....or pay taxes....!
Comment: #10
Posted by: Ronna Sommers
Thu Aug 5, 2010 10:15 AM
Russell Pearce is an abomination... Mr. Ready is an abomination---I am so sorry the people of Arizona have to be exposed to such creeps..
Comment: #11
Posted by: Ronna Sommers
Thu Aug 5, 2010 10:19 AM
What is WRONG with these so-called Christians? LOVE YOUR NEIGHBOR! Not just those who are pasty white suburban folks. These people are so filled with hate I can't stand it. Religious right? I want no part of it if that is how they think. A baby is a baby is a baby. It can't ask where it prefers to come into this world. The buck should have stopped LONG before we blamed the babies.
Comment: #12
Posted by: MzMoonpie
Thu Aug 5, 2010 1:18 PM
its not a case of blaming the babies. A host of nations will not confer citizenship by reason of being born in their nation. We do not confer citizenship on babies born to diplomats while they serve in this nation legally. This is hocum and does not square with logic a foreign mental state to those who arrive at their point of view emotionally . Dan Johnson--watertown ,SD
Comment: #13
Posted by: Daniel Johnson
Thu Aug 5, 2010 7:45 PM
If we allow the 14th Amendment to be removed, we build a foundation of question anyone's citizenship who will be born here after it's removal from law.
Our legal system is a framework and when we remove a cornerstone, based upon a small percentage of people we don't want, we stand on a possibility of topling our own being.
People who are born here are born free...a child of America.
14th Amendment is to protect ALL children born here, not just the ones we OK.
Comment: #14
Posted by: Carrie-anne
Sat Aug 7, 2010 11:49 AM
I would like to say that many other countries do give citizenship based on place of birth - just like we do. I am a dual citizen because I was born overseas while my parents were stationed there.

Dan, where did you get the idea that we don't give citizenship to babies born to diplomats? We do. The 14th Amendment states that if a person is born here, he/she is a citizen.

Seasiren, what is your plan regarding the newborn babies of illegal immigrants? If place of birth is not a determining factor for citizenship, what is? What would a person have to do to be a citizen if they are not born here? I'm assuming you were born here. . .if place of birth no longer determines citizenship, then why should we count you as American vs something else?
Comment: #15
Posted by: capiscan
Sat Aug 7, 2010 2:42 PM
The babies aren't the issue. Illegals come here because unscrupulous employers use them as a cheap source of labor that they don't have to pay benefits, don't pay withholding taxes, medicare or social security contributions for. If no one hired them, there would be little incentive to come here. Contrary to the opinion of some of those who have commented above, most illegals come here looking for work, not a free ride.
Comment: #16
Posted by: Diane
Mon Aug 9, 2010 7:21 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Connie Schultz
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 13 Feb 2012
Bill O'Reilly
Bill O'ReillyUpdated 11 Feb 2012
Mark Shields
Mark ShieldsUpdated 11 Feb 2012

5 Jul 2009 Tip to Bloggers: Keep It Real

23 Dec 2007 John Glenn: Our Similarities -- From a Distance

3 Jun 2009 Generalities Fail Us in the Abortion Debate