creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Connie Schultz icon
Connie Schultz
8 Feb 2012
Funny Man, Karl Rove

After I saw the new Chrysler ad — starring Clint Eastwood and titled "Halftime in America" … Read More.

1 Feb 2012
Komen Caves, Women Pay

The Susan G. Komen for the Cure foundation has severed its ties with Planned Parenthood. As a result, … Read More.

25 Jan 2012
Answer the Question, Candidate Gingrich

You may have noticed that most of the presidential debates are moderated by men, which gives female … Read More.

Finally, We Care About a Teen Pregnancy

Share Comment

Under normal circumstances, it's sad, but it's hardly news when an unwed 17-year-old girl ends up pregnant.

As of last week, though, there's nothing normal about this teenager's world, which is why this anguished time in her young life has become fodder for media and bloggers around the globe. That's what happens when your mother knows you're expecting but runs for vice president anyway and then sees fit to release a statement about your pregnancy to squelch rumors about her own.

Sarah Palin announced to the world Monday that her daughter is five months pregnant and plans to marry the young father. Palin made this information public to rebut blogger rumors that her own infant son is actually her daughter's and that Palin was engaged in a cover-up.

Bloggers? She outed her daughter to slap a handful of mean-spirited bloggers?

The usual assortment of pundits, mostly male, are tap-dancing around the pregnancy, insisting the real issue is one of candidate vetting, not parental responsibility. That's good for what's left of this poor girl's privacy, but this skittish chitchat doesn't come close to reflecting the millions of conversations among regular Americans.

I had not written a word about Palin when I signed on to my computer Monday, but my inboxes were brimming with e-mail and voice messages from women who were outraged that Palin decided to run for such a high-profile office when she had to know it would bring unbearable scrutiny onto her daughter. If Palin didn't expect this, she's even less experienced than her résumé suggests.

The stark reality of politics is that there is no such thing anymore as a solo candidate. Every candidate has a family. The higher the candidate's office the more intrusive the scrutiny into the personal lives of those who love the candidate, and Palin invited this the moment she trotted out her brood to a cheering crowd in Dayton, Ohio, last week. She introduced all the children who were present and bragged about being a "hockey mom." Clearly, she was telegraphing that first and foremost, she is a mother.

Of course, she also played the girlfriend card, tossing out the names of Geraldine Ferraro and Hillary Clinton as if they were her sisters united in the cause for women.

Great, except that Palin doesn't agree with much of anything Ferraro and Clinton have been championing for decades, especially reproductive rights.

In Palin's world, abortion is not an option, even in the cases of rape or incest, unless the mother's life is threatened. The question for Palin is just how much prison time a woman should serve if she chooses to abort her rapist's baby.

Many are still reeling from the suggestion that the same women who supported Hillary Clinton would turn around and vote for a radical conservative such as Palin out of — what? — spite ? The notion that droves of women would shift their allegiances because any skirt will do illustrates an astonishing disregard for the collective intelligence of our gender. Not that this is anything new in politics, but, man, did they have to be so obvious?

And now this.

Some of the same conservatives who object to sex before marriage and think a mother belongs at home are now cheering full-time candidate Sarah Palin for raising a teenager who decided to keep her baby.

As if this child had any choice. Much of her mother's short political career and virtually all of her appeal as a vice presidential candidate are staked on her opposition to a woman's right to an abortion. The legal option available to most 17-year-old girls with unplanned pregnancies was never really a choice for this girl unless she was willing to derail her mother's political career.

So pundits can yak all they want about how a 17-year-old girl's pregnancy has nothing to do with this presidential campaign.

Millions of women know otherwise.

Connie Schultz is a Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist for The Plain Dealer in Cleveland and the author of two books from Random House: "Life Happens" and "… and His Lovely Wife." To find out more about Connie Schultz (cschultz@plaind.com) and read her past columns, please visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.


Comments

4 Comments | Post Comment
I THINK THE FACT THAT SARAH PALIN HAS A DAUGHTER THAT IS PREGNANT IS NOT AN ISSUE, BUT SHE ALSO HAS AN INFANT ( AND A SPECIAL NEEDS INFANT) THAT WILL BE SUFFERING BECAUSE SARAH PALIN CHOSE TO ACCEPT THIS POSITION. THIS CHILD NEEDS HER MOM. IS SARAH READY TO GIVE UP FOUR YEARS OF THIS CHILD. SHAMEFUL.
Comment: #1
Posted by: ginny bezoski
Wed Sep 3, 2008 1:34 PM
Your timing of this column could not be worse. You come across like a whining democrat grasping for anything against your opponent....oh! I forgot ! You are! After last night's speech, your column today makes your opinions look pitiful, desperate and shallow. How could women not support a strong, gifted leader like Sarah? Last night's speech was about as perfect as it gets. Finally, a strong, articulate woman leader that has her head on straight for America's future.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Louise
Thu Sep 4, 2008 6:16 AM
Give me a break!
Would you have written the same column about Sarah Palin's husband?
I'm appalled at the hypocrisy in the liberal media...
I wrote this to my friends:
No matter which side of the aisle you're on, Ladies...you ought to be good and mad at the liberal media's castigating of Sarah Palin. As a female child of the 60's and a Southern conservative, I am disgusted with the blatant attacks on Sarah Palin. Apparently, I've been naive to believe all these years that the women's movement was about WOMEN'S RIGHTS and not a powerful liberal machine that happens to incorporate the word "WOMEN". What a hypocritical double standard. If Sarah Palin was a Democrat, we, women would be in the street, marching to "I am woman, hear me roar..." and burning our bras!
I happen to line up politically with Sarah Palin and I know, many of you don't. It doesn't matter! We need to make our voice heard and let our "sisters" and the liberal media know, women won't be questioned and scrutinized on the basis of our family situations, marital status, the number of children we have or the fact that we don't have male anatomy.
Please take a moment and read liberal and fellow female, Susan Estrich's comments from yesterday. It is on the mark! (see link below) It's time we, women agree to disagree and stand up and have a 1960's fit over the double standard we've experienced for the past 6 days.
I cannot be silent on this one! There is simply TOO much at stake!
http://www.creators.com/comments/opinion/sarah-s-choice.html
Like I said...I may just burn my bra!
Comment: #3
Posted by: Jane Sterling
Thu Sep 4, 2008 8:20 AM
If memory serves me correct it was just a few months ago that Ms. Schulz was going on about what a beautiful sight it was to see her son with her grandchild. Well Ms Schulz, let me state the obvious - if your daughter-in-law opted for an abortion when she found out she was pregnant, you would not have been able to witness that beautiful sight!!!
Just a little food for thought and something to think about, but I doubt it hits home with you, you're too busy on your ssoap box preaching!!
Comment: #4
Posted by: msmick2248
Thu Sep 4, 2008 8:34 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Connie Schultz
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Lawrence Kudlow
Lawrence KudlowUpdated 16 Feb 2012
Judge Napolitano
Judge Andrew P. NapolitanoUpdated 16 Feb 2012
Joe Conason
Joe ConasonUpdated 16 Feb 2012

5 Oct 2008 How To Talk to Someone Who Sounds Racist

7 Dec 2008 Another Stupid Theory About Women

1 Jun 2008 It's Time for a New Metaphor for War