creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Connie Schultz icon
Connie Schultz
15 May 2013
Already, Some Whistle-blowers Have Lost Their Nerve

Two weeks after the press partied hearty with President Barack Obama at the White House Correspondents' … Read More.

8 May 2013
Cleveland Ordeal Dredges Up Trauma for Others, Too

To listen to Connie Schultz talk about this column and the surrounding issues, click here. As I write this, … Read More.

1 May 2013
In the Wake of Another Factory Fire: Calling All Women

For many years, the Philadelphia Female Anti-Slavery Society held an annual fair that sold only goods that weren'… Read More.

Every Woman With a Gun Has a Story

Comment

Gina Odom didn't like guns until she felt that her baby's safety was threatened.

Daniela Halliburton armed herself when she returned to a home ripped apart by Hurricane Katrina.

Susan Fowler and Mary (last name withheld) grew up with weapons in the house. Ask about their first guns, and their voices soften to describe cherished childhood memories.

Earlier this week, I posted a Facebook request to interview female gun owners. In two hours, more than 150 responded, including these four women. Like many who reached out, they are liberals, which is why I wanted to talk to them. We agree on many issues, but I do not share their comfort level with guns.

It is increasingly clear that for many — men and women, Democrats and Republicans — gun control is an issue of personal experience, not politics. We never are going to find common ground without trying to understand one another.

Odom is 40 and lives in Cordele, Ga. She did not grow up with guns, but her husband did. To her initial dismay, when they bought a house, his guns moved in with them.

Odom changed her mind after an encounter with a stranger as she pushed her newborn daughter in a stroller.

"It was clear he'd been watching us," she said. "He could describe my furniture. I was terrified. My husband was working nights. I went into mama bear mode. I told him, 'I can't be here alone at night with no way to defend myself.'"

She researched and bought a .22-caliber pistol. Her husband hung a man's shirt for target practice. "If you can hit that shirt," he told her, "you can protect yourself."

Odom and her husband share the same politics, except on gun control. "We both voted for Obama, both times, but my husband is part of that culture of fear," Odom said. "Like a lot of his friends, he'll say, 'Obama's going to get our guns.'"

She blames the National Rifle Association. "I see the stuff he gets in the mail. They keep telling him, 'If you give up any little right, the government will take away your guns.' They're promoting fear, and it shuts down the conversation."

Mary, who asked that her last name not be used, is married, with one daughter and another on the way. She is an equities trader in Denver, but she grew up in rural Tennessee. Guns were a way of life. She has four, including a Winchester Special, which she bought with her own money at 16. In our interview, she used the word "responsible" nearly two dozen times.

"The whole gun culture has changed," she said. "It used to be you learned how to be responsible.

Now it's, 'Get a gun.' They aren't learning self-defense. They're not taking gun safety classes. If you aren't willing to go to safety class, you're exactly the person who shouldn't have a gun."

Daniela Halliburton is a 42-year-old lesbian who works as a data analyst at Tulane University in New Orleans. She grew up in rural Louisiana. At 6, she was the proud owner of a BB gun. Her father gave her a "real gun" when she was 12 and taught her how to use it.

"He taught me how to aim, how to load and clean a gun, how to shoot better," she said. "It was part of family life."

After Katrina destroyed her home, she returned to salvage what was left of it. She carried a gun on her at all times. "Eight years later, I still think that was the right thing for me to do," she said.

Susan Fowler is 54, a self-described "flaming left-wing liberal" and the chairwoman of the Democratic Party in Lyon County, Kan. She is a former police dispatcher and teaches psychology at a local college.

She, too, grew up with guns. She owns two handguns and a rifle and uses them on her farm. "I like taking out critters when I have to," she said.

Fowler said most female gun owners she knows support universal background checks. This was true of virtually every woman I interviewed. Repeatedly, they also brought up domestic violence. A man with a restraining order against him, they said, should lose his gun.

It's popular right now to say women own guns to feel a sense of power, but most of the women I interviewed scoffed at this notion.

"That's a masculine take on guns and power," Halliburton said. "We never talk about feeling any power. Women talk about defending against rapists and batterers, someone who's going to invade the home and hurt women."

Odom said: "Safety? Yes. Power? No. Power for me means I'm respected for my opinion. It means I'm heard."

Fowler agreed. "I don't make the connection between gun ownership and power. My power comes from my intellect, not the tools I own."

Mindset matters, Mary said. "Thinking from a position of 'I'll show you' or 'I feel weak' is not power," she said. "Being in control of your emotions before you use your gun — that's power."

Fowler said that many express surprise when they learn she owns guns. At the most recent county fair, she struck up a conversation with the local NRA president, whose booth was near hers.

"I don't think he likes me," she said, "but he did tell the sheriff later that I'm the only Democrat he knows who owns a gun."

She laughed.

"That is absolutely wrong," she said. "We're everywhere."

Connie Schultz is a Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist and an essayist for Parade magazine. She is the author of two books, including "...and His Lovely Wife," which chronicled the successful race of her husband, Sherrod Brown, for the U.S. Senate. To find out more about Connie Schultz (con.schultz@yahoo.com) and read her past columns, please visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2013 CREATORS.COM



Comments

14 Comments | Post Comment
Re: "blames the National Rifle Association. “I see the stuff he gets in the mail. They keep telling him, 'If you give up any little right, the government will take away your guns.' They're promoting fear..."
Odom changed her mind after an encounter with a stranger and bought a gun out of fear
[A]fter Katrina destroyed her home, she (Daniela) returned to salvage what was left of it. She carried a gun on her at all times out of fear
Women talk about defending against rapists and batterers
"That's a masculine take on guns and power,” Actually men talk about defending themselves, their families and their Country
Chicago, Detroit and DC have some of the most strict gun laws in the nation. People are being murdered by criminals, not law abiding gun owners on a daily basis. More gun control and universal gun registration will not solve that. Criminals do not honor gun free zones but look for them (Colorado theater) because they know that those places are helpless victim zones.
I don't belong to the NRA. I do know, however that every country that has had their guns taken away from them by their government sooner or later suffers from government tyranny.
Gun control, no matter how popular, is not one of the enumerated powers granted to the federal government by the States. The Second Amendment decrees that the right of the people to bear arms... shall... not... be... infringed... It is the Law and as a Patriot I have pledged my life, my fortune (small though it is) and my sacred honor to uphold and defend it. Would that Obama and you along with the rest of the Obama camp would do the same instead of using a tragedy perpetrated by a lunatic criminal who murdered his mother and stole her guns to infringe the right of law-abiding citizens.
Comment: #1
Posted by: David Henricks
Wed Feb 13, 2013 5:14 PM
I did purchase a gun out of fear. I was afraid of someone who obviously had been watching my home as we moved into it and remembered enough details to recite back to me what he had seen months later. Just the act of letting me know he knew what was in my house felt threatening. I defend the right of people to own guns and protect themselves. In my opinion what the NRA promotes is an atmosphere of fear and distrust of the government in a way that shuts down any conversation about guns.There are obvious problems with our culture and violence. Guns play a large role in that problem. Not the only role, but it still has to be addressed. I'm also sorry that so many people see it as political tactics to discuss this type of thing after a tragedy. But that is what we do. After 9/11, we go to war. We have the patriot act. We detain prisoners indefinitely without due process. We take our shoes off before getting on a plane to make sure we aren't hiding bombs. We have to measure our liquids before travelling by plane. Obviously tragedy is our trigger to try to make our society safer. Honestly sometimes it's the only thing we can do when we don't know what else to do. So yes, I bought a gun when I was afraid. And yes, I still own a gun and don't want to give it up. And none of that negates that there is an organizaiton and a culture who preys on the fears of gun-owners in an effort to shut down any conversation about the real problems we face. And gun-owners NEED to be involved in that conversation.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Gina Odom
Thu Feb 14, 2013 6:07 AM
Gina I take it you are the same woman from this story. What you say about using political tactics after a tragedy makes sense. We shoulden't have kneejerk reactions to these tragedies because we never strike at the roots of these problems. I have no love for the NRA, and I carry a gun. I honestly coulden't tell you if its out of fear, caution, responsibility or power. All I know is that there are bad people out there and a gun helps protect me from them.
When I first read the title of this article, I didn't know if it was going to be pro or anti-gun. I suppose its a little of both. I think that its very important to understand that women are targeted by men for sexual assault every day, and untold thousands of women have used a gun to stop their attacker. That makes guns worth having in my book.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Chris McCoy
Thu Feb 14, 2013 6:47 AM
Gina I take it you are the same woman from this story. What you say about using political tactics after a tragedy makes sense. We shoulden't have kneejerk reactions to these tragedies because we never strike at the roots of these problems. I have no love for the NRA, and I carry a gun. I honestly coulden't tell you if its out of fear, caution, responsibility or power. All I know is that there are bad people out there and a gun helps protect me from them.
When I first read the title of this article, I didn't know if it was going to be pro or anti-gun. I suppose its a little of both. I think that its very important to understand that women are targeted by men for sexual assault every day, and untold thousands of women have used a gun to stop their attacker. That makes guns worth having in my book.
Comment: #4
Posted by: Chris McCoy
Thu Feb 14, 2013 6:48 AM
Gina I take it you are the same woman from this story. What you say about using political tactics after a tragedy makes sense. We shoulden't have kneejerk reactions to these tragedies because we never strike at the roots of these problems. I have no love for the NRA, and I carry a gun. I honestly coulden't tell you if its out of fear, caution, responsibility or power. All I know is that there are bad people out there and a gun helps protect me from them.
When I first read the title of this article, I didn't know if it was going to be pro or anti-gun. I suppose its a little of both. I think that its very important to understand that women are targeted by men for sexual assault every day, and untold thousands of women have used a gun to stop their attacker. That makes guns worth having in my book.
Comment: #5
Posted by: Chris McCoy
Thu Feb 14, 2013 6:49 AM
Re: Gina Odom Gina, I appreciate your taking the time to respond to my post. I'm glad that you are safe and armed. May you never have to defend yourself. I never owned a gun until I was 60-years-old. Like you, I thought the NRA was a bunch of whacko, fear-mongering gun nuts and I thought they were going to get everybody killed. One day at work, someone left an article about Agenda 21 on a conference room table. I was bored, waiting for my meeting to start so I read it. It got me thinking and since I have access to all the information in the world at my fingertips via the Internet I started investigating. Here are some things I learned about our Founding Fathers and their fear of government. It gave them pause and I believe the Constitution and The first Ten Amendments reflect that fear as a warning to future generations to follow. The more I read about the founding of Our Country and The Constitution The more I think that the NRA has a wimpy message compared to George Washington, Thomas Jefferson and the rest.
www (dot) brainyquote()dotcom/quotes/authors/g/george_washington.html#7SxDafJdJDEyoscI.99
ruth will ultimately prevail where there is pains to bring it to light.
Government is not reason; it is not eloquent; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master.
Firearms are second only to the Constitution in importance; they are the peoples' liberty's teeth
Experience teaches us that it is much easier to prevent an enemy from posting themselves than it is to dislodge them after they have got possession
and some from Thomas Jefferson
Fear of Government-over-Man was the dominant fear in that day (1700's) of uncompromisingly individualistic Americans--Free Men, ever jealous of the safety of Individual Liberty, of the security of their God-given, unalienable rights against violation by government.
www (dot) lexrex.com/enlightened/AmericanIdeal/yardstick/pr2.html
This will give you a link to Kentucky Resolutions of 1798
Comment: #6
Posted by: David Henricks
Thu Feb 14, 2013 6:59 PM
I was very interested in your column on women and firearms. I am a politically moderate (just one tick left of center) registered Independent woman who was raised in a home with firearms and was taught at the age of twelve to shoot and safely handle a rifle. My mother cut a switch before she let me carry the .22 Winchester into the woods and every time the barrel pointed in an unsafe direction I got a sharp snap across the back of my legs. I learned very quickly. As a child of the Depression and war rationing, my mother believed that her daughters needed to know how to put food on the table should the economy again go very wrong. This ability to shoot and prepare wild game kept my birth family in meat while others often went without. I have kept that ethic to this day and passed it along to my daughter and sons. The men in my family remain the principal hunters, but the women can at need go out and shoot some dinner. I took the NRA firearm safety course before I got my first hunting license and it was well-taught and worthwhile. My children did the same and now my grandchildren will take the same course as they reach their teen years. That is about the best I can say for the NRA. I believe that the organization has been hijacked by fear mongers who play on conspiracy theories to create an atmosphere of distrust and enmity among the American people. This, unfortunately, makes it difficult or impossible to have a rational discussion on the subject. There are rational and valid reasons to own and bear firearms. Living in the country, I occasionally have to deal with unwanted visitors -- rabid raccoons, bad-tempered water snakes, weasels in the henhouse, etc. If I lived in a city, I might want to carry a handgun with me when traveling at night. There is also good reason to place some rational limits on the possession and use of firearms. Given HIPPA laws and the difficulty of even trained mental health professionals (of whom I am one) to accurately predict who will and who will not become violent, this is a very difficult issue and needs to be approached with clear, calm heads and good, reliable research as to what has and what has not worked in other places. The NRA's demagoguery is seriously impeding this process. Please keep on writing and soliciting good input and perhaps you can use your bully pulpit to have some sort of positive influence on the issue.
Comment: #7
Posted by: Thea Kester
Sat Feb 16, 2013 1:48 PM
Re: Thea Kester I'm glad that you and your family approach firearm safety from a common sense point of view. Every State in our Constitutional Republic has requirements for it's Citizens and visitors concerning firearms. The objection to universal gun control stems from the fact that it is not one of the enumerated powers granted to the federal government by The States. If, The Constitution is not The Supreme Law of Our Country concerning weapons then it cannot be The Supreme Law for any of the other unalienable rights guaranteed to our Citizens. A multitude of bills are being drafted to confiscate weapons from law-abiding citizens.
Comment: #8
Posted by: David Henricks
Sun Feb 17, 2013 3:23 PM
Gina had a proportionate reaction to a legitimate fear...something actually based in reality. She didn't go out and buy an arsenal of semi-automatics and hoard ammunition. She bought one pistol, an appropriate weapon for her purpose. You, David, have an entirely different irrational fear. This nonsense about protecting yourself from government is completely delusional.
There are no "multitudes of bills" to confiscate weapons. You're referring to a state bill in Missouri that is never going to go anywhere. None would. It's unconstitutional.
You are spreading false information with no historical context. Your knowledge of United States history is fragile and erratic. You are one of the people living in fear-monger fantasy land participating in the orchestrated effort to shut down conversation about gun regulation. Gun regulation will not solve all of our problems with violence, but it is a necessary part.
Comment: #9
Posted by: Daniela Halliburton
Mon Feb 18, 2013 10:58 PM
Re: Daniela Halliburton New York, New Jersey, California, Ohio, Washington. Not to mention Obama has threatrned to use Executive Order to confiscate guns. When criminals kill people and the government goes after law abiding citizens in retaliation, that's insane. Gun control is not one of the enumerated powers granted to the federal government by the States. All federal efforts to pass gun control is un_Constitutional, but that isn't stopping them, is it?
Comment: #10
Posted by: David Henricks
Tue Feb 19, 2013 3:13 AM
Give the bill numbers or the quotes. Prove it.
Criminals didn't kill people. People became criminals BY killing people. The Aurora and Newtown shooters were both law-abiding citizens.
Federal regulation of guns would be covered under the Commerce clause. In the unlikely event that is struck down, states would be perfectly constitutional in regulating guns themselves, per your own argument, and per reality. The Supreme Court has held multiple times that certain types of weapons can be regulated.
Regulation is not the same as confiscation. Other constitutional rights are regulated. The second amendment actually states that arms bearing SHOULD be regulated. Why all the freaking out?
Comment: #11
Posted by: Daniela Halliburton
Tue Feb 19, 2013 10:08 AM
Re: Daniela Halliburton Federal H.R.2403 and Diane Feinstein of California has the Assault Weapons Ban of 2013 on her website look up the rest for yourself.
The Newtown shooter was not eligible to own a weapon so he murdered his mother and stole her guns just before he went to the school to murder more people. In the eyse of the law and any reasonable person, Adam Lanza was definitely not a law abiding citizen. The Second Amendment says A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. The Second Amendment says nothing about regulating weapons. The militia is the people who bring their own weapons and The Supreme Court has ruled on that. That ruling and other pertinent information is provided by the following video on CT efforts at gun control. ww(dot)youtube(dot)com/watch?v=NyYYgLzF6zU
Comment: #12
Posted by: David Henricks
Tue Feb 19, 2013 8:39 PM
AWB of 2013 contains nothing about confiscating lawfully purchased firearms.

HR2403 (from 2003 and currently dead in the Subcommitte on Terrorism and Homeland Security) also contains nothing about confiscating lawfull owned weapons. It does allow for the seizure of defective or illegally imported, illegally imported, or illegally manufactured weapons.

Lanza was eligible to own a firearm. He was turned down because he did not want to wait 14 days, not because he did not pass the background check. And he would have passed; he had no criminal record. He was a law-abiding citized until the second he murdered his mother.
Comment: #13
Posted by: Daniela Halliburton
Wed Feb 20, 2013 11:01 AM
I did not say that the second amendment said anything about regulating weapons; my exact words were that "arms bearing should be regulated". A well-regulated militia, then would be a well-regulated group of gun owners. I believe such regulation includes what kind of arms and what kind of people. I cannot see how it can be interpreted differently.
Despite the first half of the amendment, the right to bear arms extends to non-militia. So be it. We can deal with that. This right is absolutely in no way in any danger. What many of us hope to limit is type of weapons available. There is simply no reason for civilians to be armed as well as the police or military of the most powerful country in the world. It's ridiculous. We do not need armor piercing rifles. We do not need 100, or even 30 round magazines. It is simply not necessary to our self-defense or hunting. If you need 30 rounds to protect yourself or hit a deer, you're a crappy shot.
So, again. Why all the freaking out? What are you afraid is going to happen?
Comment: #14
Posted by: Daniela Halliburton
Wed Feb 20, 2013 12:49 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Connie Schultz
May. `13
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
28 29 30 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31 1
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Betsy McCaughey
Betsy McCaugheyUpdated 22 May 2013
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 22 May 2013
Susan EstrichUpdated 22 May 2013

9 Mar 2008 Campaign Supporters Who Are Not Really Supporters

3 Apr 2013 How Not to Write a Woman's Obituary

12 Aug 2009 Who Wins When Americans Are Afraid?