creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Connie Schultz icon
Connie Schultz
8 Feb 2012
Funny Man, Karl Rove

After I saw the new Chrysler ad — starring Clint Eastwood and titled "Halftime in America" … Read More.

1 Feb 2012
Komen Caves, Women Pay

The Susan G. Komen for the Cure foundation has severed its ties with Planned Parenthood. As a result, … Read More.

25 Jan 2012
Answer the Question, Candidate Gingrich

You may have noticed that most of the presidential debates are moderated by men, which gives female … Read More.

Democracy Needs the Wagging Tongue

Share Comment

Whenever somebody tries to ban talk of politics at get-togethers, it's all I can do to suppress a groan.

What could be better fodder for lively discussion than our relationship with our country?

Granted, these are often difficult conversations, but why wouldn't they be? Most of us have conflicted affection for America. How better to hash out our theories than to put to words what we're thinking and then let others have at it?

Sometimes, we can change someone else's mind. Other times, they change ours. Every time, we have the chance to consider another viewpoint, and that's the only way to inch closer to common ground, where the real work of democracy takes root.

Most of us aren't that good at keeping our thoughts to ourselves anyway. Just because we don't say what's on our minds doesn't mean others can't take one look at us and know that something's up. We seep out, and then the problem becomes one of interpretation. If the only signs we give off are wrinkled brows and an affinity for the non sequitur, then the people we're trying hard not to offend are free to insult us with their wrong assumptions. Then we simmer with resentment, which is no good for the arteries, not to mention what it does to our faces over time.

When it comes to politics, too many suppressed thoughts aren't good for the country, either, especially right now.

Last week, I was part of a radio discussion about politics, race and gender on WCPN, a public radio station in Cleveland. A young African-American female caller named Sheila described how conflicted she had felt during the presidential primary. Her struggle was not over whom to support, but how much to show it.

"I feel like I've had to censor myself … or contain my excitement about Barack Obama being an African-American," she said.

It helped that he won. "I feel a sigh of relief to say I'm really proud, and I want to embrace that," she said.

Later that same day, I got an e-mail from Mary, a longtime activist who is devastated by Hillary Clinton's loss. She had listened to the show and wanted to share a few of her own thoughts.

"This is risky, as until now I have refrained from words on the end of this campaign," her letter began.

She mentioned how hard it is, as a feminist, not to feel Hillary's loss as a setback for women. The show's discussion had stoked hope, but then Sheila called.

"I crashed again when the gentle African American woman caller talked about her emotional reluctance to openly embrace Barack Obama," Mary wrote. "And then he won and now she feels like America has finally embraced — or at least not rejected — a black leader. It washed over me again — that's how I feel — like once again America did reject women."

Now, there are those who roll their eyes and dismiss the Marys and the Sheilas of the world as overwrought hand-wringers.

"Get over yourself," they might say.

Translation: Shut up already.

That doesn't help Mary or Sheila or any of the other Americans right now who either are excited or deflated by the presidential race and feel they have to navigate on tiptoe. One African-American friend who quietly supported Clinton told me that when she drops off her sons at school, many of the white mothers who not so quietly supported Clinton now avoid her. Those women not only make the wrong assumption about my friend's support but also her willingness to talk about how they feel.

This is the same story in a lot of friendships and families right now. The good news is that so many are engaged in the political process. The not-so-good news is that fear of discord is dividing too many people who have so much in common.

In other words, this silent treatment ain't working.

The worst part of a tough conversation is usually the anxiety leading up to it. Once you start talking, you usually end up wondering what took you so long. That's true in love, and it's just as true in politics.

And the next time someone insists that politics has no place at the dinner table or anywhere else you've gathered with friends or family, maybe your best response is to quote the late Rev. William Sloane Coffin, who said that we should carry on the same lovers' quarrel with our country that God carries on with the whole world.

Guaranteed icebreaker that one.

Connie Schultz is a Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist for The Plain Dealer in Cleveland and the author of two books from Random House: "Life Happens" and "… and His Lovely Wife." To find out more about Connie Schultz (cschultz@plaind.com) and read her past columns, please visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.


Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment
What is really scary to me is the overwhelming apathy due to fear that has taken over this Country. True, I speak a very powerful form of truth because I speak of the hijacking of this Countries Presidency from Nov. 22 1963 to the present. The facts speak for themselves to all who choose to open their eyes and see the lies told, and sold, by the complicate Corporate Media. Lies totally debunked by the truthful statements of credible eyewitness at the time. The fact is that this Country was traveling a track of dynamic social change in the 1960's with the force of leadership provided by the likes of John F. Kennedy, Martin Luther King and Robert F. Kennedy. When these three leaders were murdered, with the help of mutual agencies of our government, we as a Country were derailed from that path of change and forced down the road of military might makes right with its monstrous profits for the Military-Industrial Complex President Eisenhower so aptly warned of less than three short years before in his farewell speech to the nation. Where we are today is the direct result of this governments actions in selecting leadership through the ensuing years and until this Nation awakens to this fact and courageously makes the necessary changes, we will erode from within through a deadly combination of manipulation and inertia.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Daniel Weis
Sun Jun 15, 2008 4:35 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Connie Schultz
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Lawrence Kudlow
Lawrence KudlowUpdated 16 Feb 2012
Judge Napolitano
Judge Andrew P. NapolitanoUpdated 16 Feb 2012
Joe Conason
Joe ConasonUpdated 16 Feb 2012

4 Dec 2007 Dying To Do the Laundry

25 Oct 2009 Suddenly We Care About Others' Paid Sick Leave

26 Oct 2011 Time for Costume Chaos