creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Connie Schultz icon
Connie Schultz
8 Feb 2012
Funny Man, Karl Rove

After I saw the new Chrysler ad — starring Clint Eastwood and titled "Halftime in America" … Read More.

1 Feb 2012
Komen Caves, Women Pay

The Susan G. Komen for the Cure foundation has severed its ties with Planned Parenthood. As a result, … Read More.

25 Jan 2012
Answer the Question, Candidate Gingrich

You may have noticed that most of the presidential debates are moderated by men, which gives female … Read More.

A Tip or Two for Starbucks

Share Comment

Once again, we have questions about a tip jar.

This time, the dispute takes place at a coffeehouse. And not just any coffeehouse, which explains the coast-to-coast hand-wringing by managers who should know better.

A California judge has ordered Starbucks to pay more than $100 million to its low-wage coffee servers, called "baristas," after ruling that the company violated state law in allowing supervisors to share in the tip pool. The decision applies only to California but could influence tip jar policies across the country.

Not every state, by the way, has a law forbidding managers and supervisors from taking a cut of the tips. It may be wrong, but in many states, it's legal.

Starbucks called the decision "fundamentally unfair and beyond all common sense and reason." Interestingly, many Starbucks employees — including baristas — agree, which is why this is more complicated than the typical management tip-skimming maneuver. Baristas insisted to journalists, including me, that their supervisors often brew coffee and wait on customers just like they do.

"I can't hire or fire anybody," one supervisor in the Cleveland area told me. "The only difference between me and a barista is that I count the money and I have keys." Supervisors also reportedly make $1 to $2 more an hour. I don't know for sure because no one at Starbucks' corporate headquarters would talk to me.

Instead, spokeswoman Bridget Baker suggested, via e-mail, that I visit the company's Web site to read the press release announcing its intention to appeal and CEO Howard Schultz's statement to employees. (Schultz and I are not related.)

In his March 21 letter, Schultz mentioned the company's health care coverage for part-timers and its employee stock option program as examples of the company's "appreciation." Then he assured his "partners" — which is what they call employees in Starbucks land — that baristas and shift supervisors would continue to divide tips from the jar at the end of each week.

What was missing in Schultz's response was any acknowledgement of his unwritten contract with customers.

Wherever there is a tip jar, there is an assumption about who gets the gratuity.

And customers have plenty to say about who that person should be. I learned that four years ago after writing about a tip jar at the coat check in a popular party center in Cleveland.

I was retrieving my coat at the end of an evening, when I noticed the large glass jar brimming with money, mostly bills. I pointed to the jar and said to the weary clerk, "Well, at least you get a decent amount of tips for standing here."

She shook her head and said she didn't keep a cent.

"Management keeps the tips," she said.

The general manager assured me that no one cared who kept the tips. Thousands of readers assured him otherwise. It was one of those stories that generated outrage for weeks, but it only took a few hours before that manager decided to announce on a local radio show that he had changed the policy. Effective immediately.

Readers still call whenever they find out workers are being denied their rightful share of a tip jar. Usually, all I have to do is call the manager, and the policy changes. Managers know it's wrong to pocket tips meant for their workers, but they also know most customers never suspect they would do such a thing.

Starbucks was the first major U.S. company to offer health care coverage to some part-timers. It also offers tuition reimbursements and a 401(k) program. That's a high standard I wish more companies would meet.

But Starbucks has its problems with workers, too. Earlier this month, the company agreed to pay an undisclosed benefit to about 350 managers in Texas who claimed they were forced to work off the clock.

And now there's this business with the tip jars.

Starbucks supervisors work hard, and they should be paid for their efforts. The company should stop relying on customers' generosity to compensate them adequately.

And we always should remember to ask the clerk behind any counter:

Who keeps the tips?

Connie Schultz is a Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist for The Plain Dealer in Cleveland and the author of two books from Random House: "Life Happens" and "… and His Lovely Wife." To find out more about Connie Schultz (cschultz@plaind.com) and read her past columns, please visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.


Comments

4 Comments | Post Comment
"Starbucks called the decision "fundamentally unfair and beyond all common sense and reason." Interestingly, many Starbucks employees — including baristas — agree, which is why this is more complicated than the typical management tip-skimming maneuver. Baristas insisted to journalists, including me, that their supervisors often brew coffee and wait on customers just like they do.

"I can't hire or fire anybody," one supervisor in the Cleveland area told me. "The only difference between me and a barista is that I count the money and I have keys." Supervisors also reportedly make $1 to $2 more an hour. I don't know for sure because no one at Starbucks' corporate headquarters would talk to me.

And this right here is what's going on. Shift supervisors are on the floor all the time. They could just as easily be the person who gave you a smile or made you your drink. So if you're assuming the tip you're giving is going to the person in front of you, you're just as likely to be looking at a shift supervisor. Your article started out citing the opinion of the people who actually work at Starbucks, but then the conclusion didn't follow.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Joe
Wed Mar 26, 2008 3:39 PM
As a supervisor at a Chicago area Starbucks, I cannot believe the insanity of what's happening here. I've been a partner with the company for almost 7 years, and never in that time, up until now, has there been an argument over whether or not shift supervisors should be included in tips. We are not management, We are baristas with keys to the safe, who handle the cash, and set codes to lock the store at night. I am on the floor just as much as the baristas I work with, and in addition to that, I support them being on the floor and being able to manage a rush situation by either supplying them with whatever they need, jumping into whatever position I need to be in- whether it's on the bar, the register, or expediting a line in the cafe or drive thru- and also completing a long list of back work that most baristas don't have to do or even think about. It's ludicrous to me that people, both within and without the company, consider this an illegal practice. Would you tell a lead server at a restaurant that since they're the shift lead that they can't accept tips? No way. As a first-time mother, I rely on my tips to purchase formula and baby necessities. My checks go directly to my monthly expenses, so this money isn't going to waste and being pocketed. Why shouldn't shifts take part in tip sharing? Yes, we're paid more. That's the incentive for being a shift. I've had customers ask if they can tip me personally, as I know other shift supervisors have as well, because their barista wasn't friendly and didn't provide them with the proper customer service that they'd expect from Starbucks employees. I politely explain that while I'm flattered, we're a team and we work together to make sure that each situation needing correction is handled properly, and we work together to ensure that their drinks and their visits are not only satisfactory, but make them want to return. That's why we are not "employees," or "co-workers," or any other word for people who work for the same company. We're partners. We share company stock if we choose, we share work space, we share each other's lives, we support each other, and we share the same love of coffee, tea, and customer service. I love this company. It's been good to me, and I love the customers that I meet and the friends on both sides of the counter that I make each and every day. Shifts work more hours a week, create more lasting relationships with our customers since most of our baristas aren't in the store as often as we are, and we are the driving force behind making sure that the changes that our store managers and ultimately, Howard Schultz, are being enforced and followed. There should be no argument about whether or not shift supervisors take part in tips. Anyone who thinks otherwise is just ignorant.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Rebecca Salazar
Thu Mar 27, 2008 2:19 PM
shift supervisors are hourly and only 20% of teh time they work on the clock is supervisory. they are not management and have no managerial authority.

they have a key to the store, and count money sometimes....

and they are part time

Connie Schultz too often writes without facts, a huge no no in journalism. You really need to research things better! You are consistent with not doing this. And trust me, the shift probably gave better service and deserves the tips.
Comment: #3
Posted by: john
Fri Mar 28, 2008 6:01 PM
Shift supervisors are not managers. The do everything all of the other baristas do and more. There's a big difference between being made shift supervisor and being made a manager.

I found a really good article about this on TheAngryWaiter.com. In the article the guy calls shift supervisors "baristas-plus. I thought that was a really good characterization of the job.
Comment: #4
Posted by: Andrea
Sat Mar 29, 2008 10:19 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Connie Schultz
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Mark Shields
Mark ShieldsUpdated 11 Feb 2012
Joe Conason
Joe ConasonUpdated 11 Feb 2012
Jamie Stiehm
Jamie StiehmUpdated 10 Feb 2012

28 Sep 2008 To Palin Supporters: Where's Your Outrage?

9 Dec 2009 A Professor Was More Than Her Cause of Death

18 Jun 2008 Working-Class Viewers Lost One of Their Own