creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Connie Schultz icon
Connie Schultz
23 May 2012
Catholic Leaders Must Dial Down the Rhetoric

As a non-Catholic, I wrestled with an internal conflict over the birth control battle of the bishops. Part of … Read More.

16 May 2012
Dear Young Mothers: Ignore Time Magazine

In February 1989, I ended a phone interview for a magazine story I was writing and looked up to find my 21-month-… Read More.

9 May 2012
Finally, the President Says 'I Do'

This was going to be a different kind of column. My friend Jackie, through a mutual contact, arranged for me … Read More.

A Presidential Order for Compassion

Share Comment

Only four days after Peter Taylor moved in with the man he loved, he was racing him to the closest emergency room.

The following morning, his partner lay in a hospital bed and delivered the jarring news.

"I'm HIV-positive," he told Peter. "This is an opportunity for you to leave."

"Why would I do that?" Peter replied. "I'm here. I'm in love with you. And I'm staying."

Thus began the nine months they had left. They exchanged rings and planned a trip to Canada to marry, but they never made it. Sam was never healthy enough to go. (Peter asked that I give his partner a pseudonym to protect his parents' privacy.) Sam's disease soon exploded into full-blown AIDS, and he spent weeks at a time in two Cleveland-area hospitals, neither of which ever challenged Peter's primary role in Sam's life.

"We were lucky," Peter said without a trace of irony. "The hospitals saw me as his husband and recognized that I had power of attorney."

So did Sam's family, with a trust that came late. His parents were retired and lived in the same small town where Sam grew up. Initially, they struggled to accept their youngest child's homosexuality and his relationship with Peter. After Sam was diagnosed and his illness quickly overtook his daily life, they came to depend on Peter for daily updates — and his advocacy.

Peter, who is a recruiter for Case Western Reserve's nursing school, split his time between work and caring for the man he loved. He met with the doctors, tracked Sam's treatment and spent many nights sleeping on a cot by his hospital bed. Only after Sam agreed to hospice care did he move back to his hometown. He spent the last two weeks of his life at his sister's house, where Peter also was invited to stay.

This scenario could have played out very differently for Peter and Sam, as it has for too many couples like them. Many hospitals across the country still refuse to acknowledge the rights of gay and lesbian partners, which compounds patients' suffering and often paves the way for interfering relatives with their own agendas.

Even if a couple live near a hospital that recognizes their rights as partners, fear looms.

One never knows when illness may strike. Every out-of-town visit to family, every vacation, every road trip, they worry whether their documents — and their very relationship — would be honored if one of them were rushed to a hospital. Anyone who ever has had a loved one hospitalized knows the crucial role a family advocate can play.

Last week, President Barack Obama finally issued an order that forces most hospitals to respect the rights of gay and lesbian partners. In essence, he told them to treat these couples like any heterosexual patient with a significant other and the necessary advance directives, such as durable power of attorney and health care proxy. As usual, what's good for gay and lesbian Americans is good for the rest of us, too, as the change in policy also stands to help single and widowed straight people who need the "support and comfort of a good friend."

"For all of these Americans," the president wrote, "the failure to have their wishes respected concerning who may visit them or make medical decisions on their behalf has real consequences. It means that doctors and nurses do not always have the best information about patients' medications and medical histories and that friends and certain family members are unable to serve as intermediaries to help communicate patients' needs. ... And it means that all too often, people are made to suffer or even to pass away alone, denied the comfort of companionship in their final moments while a loved one is left worrying and pacing down the hall."

It's sad to think we needed a presidential order to force more hospitals to do the right thing for Americans who want to do exactly what we encourage and celebrate in committed couples.

Peter Taylor said the sense of relief among gay and lesbian couples is palpable. He does not have HIV, but he still thinks about what could have happened if Sam had not ended up at the right hospital.

"It would have been hell on earth," he said. "Truly, hell on earth."

Can't help but wonder whether, from God's view, there wouldn't also be hell to pay.

Connie Schultz is a Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist for The Plain Dealer in Cleveland and essayist for Parade magazine. To find out more about Connie Schultz (cschultz@plaind.com) and read her past columns, please visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM


Comments

2 Comments | Post Comment
Thanks for this link from facebook Connie! I Ilove it, this is a wonderful cite! Got it bookmarked and look forward to your posts here. Peace and Blessings!
Comment: #1
Posted by: Michael Farley Sr
Sun Apr 18, 2010 7:41 AM
As a lesbian partner of 28 years with my beloved, who reared two children with her, I am extremely aware of the power that this society has to ignore the sanctity and beauty of our family in countless cruel & unusual ways, including but not limited to hospital visitation bans. I am grateful that our President has noticed that there is a problem with inequality treatment of LGBT/SGL/QUEER residents our nation. But celebration is premature until we can view the proposed resolution of this hospital visitation/decision-making delimma; I prefer to wait to read the actual wording of the document; I prefer to ferret out the "teeth" of the sanction, if any. Is the Sec. of Health & Human Services exploring what will be drafted as law or mere guidelines; what happens to hospitals if/when hospitals don't comply; how quick is the governmental response, if any; how much "descretion" will hospitals have to decide "in the best interest of their patient" to exclude the patient's partner? As long as the Plessey-esque anti- marriage-equality exists, bigots can and will prevail.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Leslye M. Huff
Sun Apr 18, 2010 11:36 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Connie Schultz
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

28 Mar 2012 Trayvon Martin's Fate Is Still Too Many Parents' Fear

9 Dec 2009 A Professor Was More Than Her Cause of Death

23 Mar 2011 Meanwhile, in Afghanistan...