creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris
22 May 2012
IRS Gives Billions in Tax Refunds to Illegals

WTHR, the NBC affiliate in Indianapolis, recently reported about how millions of illegal aliens are getting … Read More.

15 May 2012
The Feds' Intrusions Into American Farms and Families

With Mother's Day right at our back, I want to address one of the most extreme overreaches by the federal … Read More.

8 May 2012
How Romney and Our Republic Can Win (Part 2)

Last week, I showed how the Republican Party likely would lose the presidential election in November if it … Read More.

The Greatest Obstacle to Border Enforcement, Part 3

Share Comment

There is one gigantic obstacle that stands before America and our immigration crisis. And, quite frankly, it is in my estimation an insurmountable roadblock that will inhibit any resolution that enforces current immigration law, especially as it pertains to illegal immigrants. That barrier is not a people, policy or protocol. It is our president.

I seriously doubt that our current commander in chief can lead our nation out of this immigration mess because of a single fundamental and philosophical difference he has with most Americans, previous administrations and even our founders.

President Obama declared it in the Rose Garden two weeks ago in the presence of Mexico's President Felipe Calderon and an international television audience. And it seemed to escape the attention of most. It was one of the most un-American, unconstitutional and radical statements to date from Obama's presidency. He said, "In the 21st century we are not defined by our borders, but by our bond."

His statement reminded me of what I wrote in my new expanded paperback edition of "Black Belt Patriotism": "For better or worse, we have new leadership and a new direction for America. It's a kinder and gentler Washington, to whom the global war on terror has turned into an 'Overseas Contingency Operation.' It's a softer and relational Washington, with whom international bonds are more important than national borders and boundaries." Now we have more proof from the horse's mouth.

Obama's statement in the Rose Garden is not merely a stand against Arizona's or any other states' immigration enforcement laws. It is a stand against his presidential oath, our Constitution, and our national identity, security and sovereignty. For the commander in chief to go limp on border rigidity, especially when the feds themselves recently warned of "foreign 'terrorists' breach of U.S. southern borders" (including those coming from Afghanistan, Iran, Egypt, Pakistan, Sudan, Syria and Yemen), is for the White House itself to jeopardize our national security.

Just a week ago at West Point, the president declared, "We have to shape an international order that can meet the challenges of our generation." Our relatively young commander in chief gave new marching orders to a new generation and graduating class at the military academy, saying, "The international order we seek is one that can resolve the challenges of our times ... combating a changing climate and sustaining global growth; helping countries feed themselves and care for their sick; preventing conflict and healing its wounds." His language seems eerily reminiscent to the U.S. Navy's new contested recruiting slogan, "A global force for good."

The White House website confesses that Obama's new National Security Strategy is "a blueprint for pursuing the world that we seek by outlining a strategy to rebuild our foundations, promote a just and sustainable international order ...

and universal values." It plays down the threat of terror, trumps up (24 times) the threat of "climate change," repeats calls for more "global leadership," "international cooperation" and "partnerships," and regards "American innovation as a foundation of American power," rather than military might. Does that sound like a National Security Strategy or the beginnings of an international global governance manifesto?

Still, President Obama knows he is in the political border pickle of his life. And that coddling the Mexican president, doing nothing about border violence and remaining passive in the midst of an escalating national debate on illegal immigration is a recipe for political disaster and Democrat re-election demise. So this past Tuesday, the White House unexpectedly announced that Obama will deploy up to 1,200 National Guards to America's southwest boundaries. What timing, especially after he has resisted repeated calls for weeks from border state lawmakers to deploy 6,000 military personnel.

The fact is the deployment of up to 1,200 National Guards is a political appeasement, carefully crafted as "a temporary non-combatant assignment" restricted to providing only intelligence and training. You can also bet it's not a coincidence that the White House suddenly announced a $500 million supplement for border enhancement at the very same time that Senate Republicans began introducing several border security amendments to a $60 billion war spending bill. That Oval Office has amazing timing, doesn't it?!

Though I'm grateful that the White House was muscled into doing anything at this point for our broken borders, it should be leading in this crisis, not reacting for political gain. In the end, Obama's prescription last week for the border chaos is a clear indication that he still doesn't regard the problem as dire or deteriorating. To the contrary, his remedy is truly a Band-Aid on a national open wound (border) that is bleeding profusely. Obama has more passion (in his own words) to "just plug the damn hole" of oil gushing into the Gulf of Mexico than he does to stop the illegal immigrants and contraband that are gushing through the national screens we call U.S. borders. He even activated a superfluous 1,400 National Guards in four states to manage the oil leak crisis!

One last time — consider the difference. What's more important: bonds or borders? Yours and especially your state and national leaders' answer to that question is among the most critical, because what we believe about our borders will determine the future of our country.

Will you believe and follow the philosophical precedent of globalists like President Obama, who said, "In the 21st century, we are not defined by our borders but by our bond."

Or will you join me and millions of other American citizens who believe and follow the definition offered by other leaders like President Ronald Reagan, who said, "A nation without borders is not a nation."

To find out more about Chuck Norris and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2010 CHUCK NORRIS

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM


Comments

3 Comments | Post Comment
Well done on being one of the top 3 again, Chuck. This has happened a few times now and that is encouraging. I insert here a circular (received by e-group) that is very relevant to your latest series. It's from the California Coalition for Immigration Reform. See contact details at the end. Maybe you know of them. I made a slight edit for language but that doesn't detract in any way from the seriousness of the message.
""You old white people. It is your duty to die."
HISPANIC LEADERS SPEAK OUT
Augustin Cebada, Brown Berets; "Go back to Boston! Go back to
Plymouth Rock, Pilgrims! Get out! We are the future. You are old
and tired. Go on. We have beaten you. Leave like beaten rats.
You old white people. It is your duty to die . . Through love of
having children, we are going to take over."
Richard Alatorre, Los Angeles City Council. "They're afraid we're
going to take over the governmental institutions and other
institutions. They're right. We will take them over . . . We are
here to stay."
Excelsior, the national newspaper of Mexico, "The American
Southwest seems to be slowly returning to the jurisdiction of
Mexico without firing a single shot."
Professor Jose Angel Gutierrez, University of Texas; "We have an
aging white America. They are not making babies. They are dying.
The explosion is in our population . . . I love it. They are
[defecating] in their pants with fear. I love it."
Art Torres, Chairman of the California Democratic Party, "Remember
187--proposition to deny taxpayer funds for services to non-
citizens--was the last gasp of white America in California."
Gloria Molina, Los Angeles County Supervisor, "We are politicizing
every single one of these new citizens that are becoming citizens
of this country . . . I gotta tell you that a lot of people are
saying, "I'm going to go out there and vote because I want to pay
them back."
Mario Obledo, California Coalition of Hispanic Organizations and
California State Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare under
Governor Jerry Brown, also awarded the Presidential Medal of
Freedom by President Bill Clinton, "California is going to be a
Hispanic state. Anyone who doesn't like it should leave."
Jose Pescador Osuna, Mexican Consul General, "We are practicing 'La
Reconquista' in California."
Professor Fernando Guerra, Loyola Marymount University; "We need to
avoid a white backlash by using codes understood by Latinos . . . "
Are these just the words of a few extremists? Consider that we
could fill up many pages with such quotes. Also, consider that
these are mainstream Mexican leaders.
THE U.S. VS MEXICO:
On February 15, 1998, the U.S. and Mexican soccer teams met at the
Los Angeles Coliseum. The crowd was overwhelmingly pro-Mexican
even though most lived in this country. They booed during the
National Anthem and U.S. flags were held upside down. As the match
progressed, supporters of the U.S. team were insulted, pelted with
projectiles, punched and spat upon. Beer and trash were thrown at
the U.S. players before and after the match. The coach of the U.S.
team, Steve Sampson said, "This was the most painful experience I
have ever had in this profession."
Did you know that immigrants from Mexico and other non-European
countries can come to this country and get preferences in jobs,
education, and government contracts? It's called affirmative
action or racial privilege. The Emperor of Japan or the President
of Mexico could migrate here and immediately be eligible for
special rights unavailable for Americans of European descent.
Recently, a vote was taken in the U.S. Congress to end this
practice. It was defeated. Every single Democratic senator except
Ernest Hollings voted to maintain special privileges for Hispanic,
Asian and African immigrants. They were joined by thirteen
Republicans. Bill Clinton and Al Gore have repeatedly stated that
they believe that massive immigration from countries like Mexico is
good. They have also backed special privileges for these immigrants.
Corporate America has signed on to the idea that minorities and
third world immigrants should get special, privileged status. Some
examples are Exxon, Texaco, Merrill Lynch, Boeing, Paine Weber,
Starbucks and many more.
DID YOU KNOW?:
Did you know that Mexico regularly intercedes on the side of the
defense in criminal cases involving Mexican nationals? Did you
know that Mexico has NEVER extradited a Mexican national accused of
murder in the U.S. in spite of agreements to do so? According to
the L.A. Times, Orange County, California is home to 275 gangs with
17,000 members; 98% of which are Mexican and Asian. How's your
county doing?
According to a New York Times article dated May 19, 1994, 20 years
after the great influx of legal immigrants from Southeast Asia, 30%
are still on welfare compared to 8% of households n ationwide. A
Wall Street Journal editorial dated December 5, 1994 quotes law
enforcement officials as stating that Asian mobsters are the
"greatest criminal challenge the country faces." Not bad for a
group that is still under 5% of the population.
Is education important to you? Here are the words of a teacher who
spent over 20 years in the Los Angeles School system. "Imagine
teachers in classes containing 30-40 students of widely varying
attention spans and motivation, many of whom aren't fluent in
English. Educators seek learning materials likely to reach the
majority of students and that means fewer words and math problems
and more pictures and multicultural references."
WHEN I WAS YOUNG:
When I was young, I remember hearing about the immigrants that came
through Ellis Island. They wanted to learn English. They wanted
to breathe free. They wanted to become Americans. Now too many
immigrants come here with demands. They demand to be taught in
their own language. They demand special privileges--They demand
action. They demand ethnic studies that glorify their culture.
HOW CAN YOU HELP?:
Send copies of this letter to at least two other people, 100 would
be even better. Help us get the word out.
California Coalition for Immigration Reform
5942 Edinger, Suite 113-117
Huntington Beach, CA 92649
Phone 714.921.7142"
Comment: #1
Posted by: Alan O'Reilly
Tue Jun 1, 2010 10:03 AM
Dear Chuck Norris, Good Article. the following I just received from a friend of mine and thought your readers might like to read. Politicians have made Taxpayers look like idiots! ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!
Shirley deLong, Artist, Activist, Writer
=========================================================================================


POEM - Illegal Immigrants


I cross river,
poor and broke,

Take bus,
see employment folk.

Nice man
treat me good in there,
Say I need
go see Welfare.

Welfare say,
'You come no more,

We send cash
right to your door.'

Welfare checks,
they make you wealthy,

Medicaid
it keep you healthy!

By and by,
Got plenty money,

Thanks to you, TAXPAYER dummy.

Write to friends
in motherland,

Tell them
'come, fast as you can'

They come in buses
and Ford trucks,

I buy big house
with welfare bucks.

They come here,
we live together,

More welfare checks,
it gets better!

Fourteen families,
they moving in,

But neighbor's patience
wearing thin.

Finally, white guy
moves away, ..
I buy his house,
and then I say,

'Find more aliens
for house to rent.'

In my yard
I put a tent.

Send for family
they just trash, ...
But they, too,
draw welfare cash!

Everything is
very good,
Soon we own
whole neighborhood.

We have hobby
it called breeding,

Welfare pay
for baby feeding.

Kids need dentist?
Wife need pills?

We get free!
We got no bills!

TAXPAYER crazy!
He pay all year,
To keep welfare
running here.

We think America
darn good place!
Too darn good
for white man race.

If they no like us,
they can go,
Got lots of room
in Mexico .

SEND THIS TO EVERY TAXPAYER YOU KNOW


Comment: #2
Posted by: Shirley deLong
Fri Jun 11, 2010 7:53 AM
Good Article, Chuck Norris. I thought your readers might be interested in the following that I just received.

The Kennedys & others like him did a 'Hi-Ho Hitler" job when they chose to
go along with Mattoon and the socialist party! Obama is just the scape goat
for the ones before him to make sure 'destruction' to America is his No. 1
Priorty.

==========================================================================

He has got 2 years to destroy us!



Subject: FW: Overwhelming the System...Read it and Weep



Barack Obama is no fool. He is not incompetent. To the contrary, he is

brilliant. He knows exactly what he's doing. He is purposely

overwhelming the U.S. economy to create systemic failure, economic

crisis and social chaos -- thereby destroying capitalism and our

country from within.



Barack Obama is my college classmate (Columbia University, class of

'83). As Glenn Beck correctly predicted from day one, Obama is

following the plan of Cloward & Piven, two professors at Columbia

University. They outlined a plan to socialize America by overwhelming

the system with government spending and entitlement demands. Add up the

clues below.

Taken individually they're alarming. Taken as a whole, it is a

brilliant, Machiavellian game plan to turn the United States into a

socialist/Marxist state with a permanent majority that desperately

needs government for survival ... and can be counted on to always vote

for bigger government.





Why not? They have no responsibility to pay for it.



Universal health care. The health care bill had very little to do

with health care. It had everything to do with unionizing millions of

hospital and health care workers, as well as adding 15,000 to 20,000

new IRS agents (who will join government employee unions). Obama

doesn't care that giving free health care to 30 million Americans will

add trillions to the national debt. What he does care about is that it

cements the dependence of those 30 million voters to Democrats and big

government. Who but a socialist revolutionary would pass this reckless

spending bill in the middle of a depression?





Cap and trade. Like health care legislation having nothing to do

with health care, cap and trade has nothing to do with global warming.

It has everything to do with redistribution of income, government

control of the economy and a criminal payoff to Obama's biggest

contributors. Those powerful and wealthy unions and contributors (like

GE, which owns NBC, MSNBC and CNBC) can then be counted on to support

everything Obama wants. They will kick-back hundreds of millions of

dollars in contributions to Obama and the Democratic Party to keep them

in power.

The bonus is that all the new taxes on Americans with bigger cars,

bigger homes and businesses helps Obama "spread the wealth around."



Make Puerto Rico a state. Why? Who's asking for a 51st state? Who's

asking for millions of new welfare recipients and government

entitlement addicts in the middle of a depression? Certainly not American

taxpayers.

But this has been Obama's plan all along. His goal is to add two new

Democrat senators, five Democrat congressman and a million loyal

Democratic voters who are dependent on big government.




Legalize 12 million illegal immigrants. Just giving these 12

million potential new citizens free health care alone could overwhelm

the system and bankrupt America. But it adds 12 million reliable new

Democrat voters who can be counted on to support big government. Add

another few trillion dollars in welfare, aid to dependent children,

food stamps, free medical, education, tax credits for the poor, and

eventually Social Security.






Stimulus and bailouts. Where did all that money go? It went to

Democrat contributors, organizations (ACORN), and unions -- including

billions of dollars to save or create jobs of government employees

across the country. It went to save GM and Chrysler so that their

employees could keep paying union dues. It went to AIG so that Goldman

Sachs could be bailed out (after giving Obama almost $1 million in

(contributions). A staggering $125 billion went to teachers (thereby

protecting their union dues). All those public employees will vote

loyally Democrat to protect their bloated salaries and pensions that

are bankrupting America. The country goes broke, future generations

face a bleak future, but Obama, the Democrat Party, government, and

the unions grow more powerful. The ends justify the means.




Raise taxes on small business owners, high-income earners, and job

creators. Put the entire burden on only the top 20 percent of

taxpayers, redistribute the income, punish success, and reward those

who did nothing to deserve it (except vote for Obama). Reagan wanted

to dramatically cut taxes in order to starve the government. Obama

wants to dramatically raise taxes to starve his political opposition.


With the acts outlined above, Obama and his regime have created a vast

and rapidly expanding constituency of voters dependent on big

government; a vast privileged class of public employees who work for

big government; and a government dedicated to destroying capitalism

and installing themselves as socialist rulers by overwhelming the system.





Add it up and you've got the perfect Marxist scheme -- all devised by

my Columbia University college classmate Barack Obama using the

Cloward and Piven Plan.


Comment: #3
Posted by: Shirley deLong
Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:46 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Chuck Norris
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

14 Feb 2012 Why I Chose Newt Over Santorum

27 Oct 2009 Obama's One-World Government

4 Nov 2008 'Twas the Night Before the Election