opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris
6 Nov 2015
A New Definition for Better Living Through Chemistry

Although I have had an interest in the subjects of health and fitness my entire life, I never pretend to be … Read More.

10 Feb 2015
The Defend Freedom Tour

Patrick Henry once said, "The battle, sir, is not to the strong alone; it is to the vigilant, the active, the brave."… Read More.

3 Feb 2015
Operation Digital Delta Force

I was humbled and honored to see on various global news networks how my action movies that were pirated into … Read More.

Our Commander in Chief's Christmas Crisis


Alas, after nearly three months of military deliberations, our commander in chief finally is coming out of the closet with his Afghan strategy. But is his plan based more upon politics than it is upon national security?

A big question that keeps coming to our minds is: How is it that President Barack Obama fast-tracks borrowing, bailouts and Obamacare but is slower than molasses when it comes to decisions regarding the military — especially this one, seeing as he basically is returning to Gen. Stanley McChrystal's 3-month-old solution?

Some answer that military decisions are more complicated — more life and death at stake — and warrant the delay. But I genuinely believe Obama's nearly three-month delay reflects both his leadership deficiencies and a quandary that he cannot appease the left and simultaneously fulfill his campaign promise that he would "make the fight against al-Qaida and the Taliban the top priority that it should be."

As I shared over a year ago while Obama was still on the campaign trail, a professional leadership and personality profile was completed on him that revealed that he implodes when in jams that require quick or solo decisions under pressure. St. John's University and the College of St. Benedict's Unit for the Study of Personality in Politics did this test "for anticipating Obama's likely leadership style as chief executive, thereby providing a basis for inferring the character and tenor of a prospective Obama presidency." The study concluded:

"The combination of Ambitious, Accommodating, and Outgoing patterns in Obama's profile suggests a confident conciliator personality composite. Leaders with this personality prototype, though self-assured and ambitious, are characteristically gracious, considerate, and benevolent. They are energetic, charming, and agreeable, with a special knack for settling differences, favoring mediation and compromise over force or coercion as a strategy for resolving conflict. They are driven primarily by a need for achievement and also have strong affiliation needs, but a low need for power."

Did you catch the part about "favoring mediation and compromise over force or coercion as a strategy for resolving conflict"? This type of personality might be good for mending relations, conveying the warm fuzzies and closing a used-car deal, but it is absolutely not a positive trait for a commander in chief — who must lead through emergency conflicts, which often require unpopular actions.

In a time of war, a commander in chief often doesn't have significant time to ponder and reflect; such a delay costs lives and impedes progress, which are exactly the prices we've paid over the past few months.

Long forgotten by most but a haunting reminder to me at the moment are the campaign trail words of three leading Democrats. Obama's own vice president, Joe Biden, said last year about the president's preparation for office: "Right now, I don't believe he is (prepared). The presidency is not something that lends itself to on-the-job training." And before Obama was her party's choice, Hillary Clinton repeatedly accused him of being an indecisive waffler. And former President Bill Clinton dodged giving an affirmative answer to an ABC correspondent when asked whether Obama was ready to be president, by saying, "You could argue that no one's ever ready to be president."

This much I know: We should either unleash the full potential of the U.S. military on Afghanistan to complete the mission as quickly as we can or pull out altogether and bring our service members home to U.S. soil and their families.

President Obama, please quit trying to please everyone. Help our troops on the ground overseas; complete this mission, or get them out of Dodge!

Most tragically, the real aftermath of the White House delay has been a record number of U.S. fatalities in Afghanistan — the highest total in a six-month period in the eight years of this war. There were 24 in June, 44 in July, 51 in August, 37 in September, 59 in October and 17 more in November.

Is any political or military delay worth the death of one of those courageous warriors? Could all the corporate bailouts together value more than just one of those lives? No need to rush a decision? Are you kidding me?! Why haven't the left and lame-stream media been crying out over the past few months against these war casualties the way we all did when former President George W. Bush was in office?

Let us all pray this Christmas season for the U.S. forces and the families of all the fallen freedom fighters.

God help our president. God help the Afghan people. God help us. God especially help our troops.

(I highly recommend that as Obama's Afghan strategy is sent out and received by our military personnel, we all — with our kids or grandkids — simultaneously send some form of encouragement to our troops, whether it's a Christmas care package through — the deadline for which is Dec. 5 — or a free Christmas card sent via

To find out more about Chuck Norris and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at




3 Comments | Post Comment
Re: "We should either unleash the full potential of the U.S. military on Afghanistan to complete the mission as quickly as we can or pull out altogether and bring our service members home to U.S. soil and their families." I think the sooner the latter option is implemented, the better, Chuck. The trouble with Afghanistan is, how would you know when the mission is complete? With increased Coalition troop numbers, who's to say that the insurgents won't just melt away into the hills until an opportune time presents itself for them to re-emerge? In the meantime, your main problem, like ours, is unrestricted foreign immigration that is increasingly destabilising the US into a 3rd-world ghetto, with US Gov't complicity. You urgently need to implement and sustain regime change in the US, Chuck, not overseas.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Alan O'Reilly
Tue Dec 1, 2009 9:12 AM
He thinks before he blabs, Norris. And his motive is not making money off of the controversy. Decidedly unlike you, despite your "God is on my side" pitch. Goldwater wanted to drop nuclear bombs on Vietnam. I guess you'd love to bring that strategy back. (That's what we call "history". Read up on it.) Or, more precisely, I guess you'd like to profit off of the word-sale game you could play if the Goldwater approach were to get some traction now. Go for it. Maybe you can bring it on. Pray for it. Speaking of being God's messenger, if you're looking for a good cause, why not take on the Vatican and the hierarchy it supposedly controls for tolerating and covering up child molesting among its ranks for so long, in fact, as long as it COULD go on until those who were molested spoke out and it couldn't be gotten away with any more?
Comment: #2
Posted by: Masako
Tue Dec 1, 2009 7:14 PM
Wake up call for Chuck-- ZIONIST JEWS CONTROL THE WHITEHOUSE. Do you understand yet why Rahm, Obongo's head man is a dual-citizen of israhell and a zionist jew? Look further Chuck. One after another after another, they are all jews and they just play musical chairs between installed ziopresidents. Step back and look at all the jews in our Whitehouse Chuck. Why are they there? Why does aipac insert an intern into every congressmen's office? Why do adl, aipac, and splc run rampant in our supposed federal government? Why do zionist jews control the media and hollywood? Why do they dispense to us the theater of disinformation and moral perversion presented as 'news' that is nothing but scripted lies and promotes the heinous agenda of zionist jews instead of Americans? Why do zionist jews control and dictate U.S. immigration policy for the past century, culminating in 1965 before obongo's treason, that is now turning America into a turd world country with free handouts for all? Why does obongo and his kosher congress handout trillions to big banks that are owned by fucking jews? That was our childrens' money they borrowed from the jew owned federal reserve bank at interest and gave bailouts to jew-owned banks with instead of the American people, why? Isn't all ow this against the American way of goodness and decency and rightness, Chuck? I WANT SOME ANSWERS FROM YOU CHUCK...
In the mean is a good place for facts and the truth.
Comment: #3
Posted by: biggs3
Sun Dec 6, 2009 2:24 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right: comments policy
Chuck Norris
Nov. `15
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Veronique de RugyUpdated 11 Feb 2016
Larry Elder
Larry ElderUpdated 11 Feb 2016
Matt Towery
Matt ToweryUpdated 11 Feb 2016

8 Feb 2011 What the Feds Can Learn From Egyptian Internet Control

24 Nov 2009 Thankful for Fading Freedoms

9 Sep 2008 The 'Maverette'