creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris
14 Feb 2012
Why I Chose Newt Over Santorum

In 2008 — when my wife, Gena, and I were on the campaign trail backing former Arkansas Gov. Mike … Read More.

7 Feb 2012
Waging War on the Trifecta of Tyranny

As a six-time undefeated middleweight world karate champion, I have a pretty good idea what makes a warrior. … Read More.

31 Jan 2012
Proof Voters Are Smarter Than Media and Washington Elite

I think the mainstream media and Washington elite think the majority of voters just fell off the turnip truck.… Read More.

Obama's US Assassination Program? Part 1

Share Comment

Sound too conspiratorial to be true? Like the cover-up ops of spy novels? Well, it's reality. And it is possibly the most bizarre, inhumane and abusive way that the White House is expanding its power over the American people.

It's not an extremist belief or theory of the far right. It's a fact that has been confirmed by The New York Times, The Washington Post and MSNBC and even documented by the far-left online magazine Salon.com.

And it's the gravest nightmare of U.S. citizens and abandonment of our Constitution to date: a presidential assassination program in which U.S. citizens are in the literal scopes of the executive branch based upon nothing more than allegations of terrorism involvement as the branch defines it.

Of course, the CIA has executed covert assassinations of foreigners for decades. But tragically, Obama is expanding this program to include American, non-Islamic, stateside, homegrown terrorists.

It all started in January, when The Washington Post reported: "As part of the operations, Obama approved a Dec. 24 strike against a (Yemeni) compound where a U.S. citizen, Anwar al-Aulaqi, was thought to be meeting with other regional al-Qaeda leaders. Although he was not the focus of the strike and was not killed, he has since been added to a shortlist of U.S. citizens specifically targeted for killing or capture."

"A shortlist of U.S. citizens specifically targeted for killing"?

That's right. No arrest. No Miranda rights. No due process. No trial. Just a bullet.

While the Obama administration continues its Bush-blaming for the economy, it is mega-morphing Bush policy in covert ops overseas, which was, according to the Post, "to kill U.S. citizens abroad if strong evidence existed that an American was involved in organizing or carrying out terrorist actions against the United States or U.S. interests."

Well, in recent weeks, the Obama administration has taken this overseas killing op to a new low: stateside assassinations.

A former director of national intelligence, Adm. Dennis Blair, confessed before Congress: "We take direct actions against terrorists in the intelligence community. If we think that direct action will involve killing an American, we get specific permission to do that."

If you are wondering who the "we" are to whom Adm. Blair refers, they are Smith, Wesson and the White House.

Now we know what deputy national security adviser John Brennan meant when he admitted in May, "And under President Obama, we have built upon the work of the previous administration and have accelerated efforts in many areas." (Remember when Bush's eavesdropping on U.S. citizens seemed harsh?)

Brennan further explained then that the problem of homegrown terrorists ranks as a top priority because of the increasing number of U.S.

individuals who have become "captivated by extremist ideology or causes." He went on to say, "There are ... dozens of U.S. persons who are in different parts of the world and ... are very concerning to us."

Do you think "different parts of the world" doesn't include their country of origin?

Conveniently, the Obama administration also is integrating a pervasive plan to ensure the termination of radicals as the feds deem them abroad and domestic, too, with the resurrection of the Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007, introduced by Rep. Jane Harman, D-Calif. Also known as H.R. 1955, it was passed in the House by the Democratic majority but was rejected by the Senate.

Everyone thought that legislation was dead until the Obama administration resurrected its tenets in its 52-page "National Security Strategy," released in May. So alarming is the feds' potential abuse of power that officials from London to the Kremlin are recognizing the threat to U.S. citizens.

The European Union Times reported, "Foreign Ministry reports circulating in the Kremlin today are warning that an already explosive situation in the United States is about to get a whole lot worse as a new law put forth by President Obama is said capable of seeing up to 500,000 American citizens jailed for the crime of opposing their government."

Woodrow Wilson, during his reign as president, incarcerated more than 2,000 U.S. citizens for speaking out against the government. And now for the first time since, a U.S. president is highlighting the threats of homegrown terror and literally hunting U.S. citizens as terrorists. One senior administration official said, "For the first time since 9/11, the (national security strategy) integrates homeland security and national security."

And what type of "integration" does that entail?

President Obama explained in an often overlooked statement within the "National Security Strategy": "We are now moving beyond traditional distinctions between homeland and national security. ... This includes a determination to prevent terrorist attacks against the American people by fully coordinating the actions that we take abroad with the actions and precautions that we take at home."

Could it be any clearer? Right out of the horse's mouth. Or do I need to spell out what "fully coordinating the actions that we take abroad with the actions and precautions that we take at home" means?

Remember the words "a shortlist of U.S. citizens specifically targeted for killing"?

That's right. No arrest. No Miranda rights. No due process. No trial. Just a bullet.

In Part 2 next week, I will give further evidence of "Obama's U.S. assassination program" and explain why I say the administration is going after non-Islamic stateside radicals. Check out other reasons I oppose the Obama administration in my new PSA ("patriot service announcement") at http://www.BlackBeltPatriotism.com.

To find out more about Chuck Norris and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2010 CHUCK NORRIS

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM


Comments

5 Comments | Post Comment
Are there any sources for this claim? Seems very far out there and it would be helpful to have specific links to specific sources of the legislation, the articles quoted, and where other credible professionals are interpreting the remarks and documentation in the same way.
Comment: #1
Posted by: J
Tue Jul 27, 2010 5:05 AM
Thanks for this article, Chuck. It may turn out to be prophetic. Way back in 1996, Dr Peter S. Ruckman of Pensacola Bible Institute published a book entitled Black is Beautiful (not about the black race but a historical survey, leading up to the present-day (1990s) US). In his Dedication to the book, Dr Ruckman wrote, his capitalisations, "This work is dedicated to the hundreds of middle-class American citizens who will shortly be besieged, arrested, imprisoned and SHOT for believing they had the "Civil Rights" to defend their property, and families from a Soviet-Nazi-Catholic Police State set up by the News Media, the Pentagon, the State Department, and the UN. These are the last real "Americans," who will be sacrificed by their own Congressmen, President, and "Justice" Department in the name of "peace-keeping," for the "GOOD OF HUMANITY EVERYWHERE."" The book contains some bizarre stuff but it too could be prophetic. Your president is certainly an "everywhere" president.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Alan O'Reilly
Tue Jul 27, 2010 7:00 AM
There are no references to this article. Please provide references.
Comment: #3
Posted by: John
Tue Aug 31, 2010 2:00 PM
There is probably not another more overwhelmingly agreed upon need for action, than the elimination of terrorists capable of mass murder. Any extremist, bent on getting to heaven to partake in his virgins, and indoctrinated to believe that wiping out as many of those with other ideologies as possible on his way out, should be stopped. Who would have opposed the assassination of the 911 murderers, if their intentions had been accurately vetted? Would it have mattered if they were US citizens, if US Marshals had put bullet holes in each of their heads on the planes, prior to the crashes? ...or if an agent, as the result of accurate intelligence and pursuit, would have assassinated citizen McVeigh a few blocks from the Murrah building? This is what W's eavesdropping and the National Security Strategy are about.....there IS NO DATA that proves otherwise! PLEASE Mr Norris, we don't need another "beck-patriot" cheering on the mis-informed to hate our government.
Sarah, Glenn, Rush, Newt and John, want you to believe otherwise, but OUR GOVERNMENT IS NOT OUR ENEMY. What scares me more is the stirring of the mis-informed base, who have been rendered idiots of the truth. No-sir-Chucky, it's the mis-informed-and-armed, that scare me. The hate-Obama tactics used to deceive and sway voters to the republican voting buttons, has really stirred (and cultured) some idiots.
Comment: #4
Posted by: Frank Faucheux
Tue Sep 14, 2010 7:56 AM
Now all the Republicans during the reign of Bush, said we need to shred the constitution for our own safety. Now with the patriot act and FISA snooping in the hands of the democrats they are wondering why the hell we passed these laws.

"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
Benjamin Franklin
Comment: #5
Posted by:
Wed Sep 29, 2010 2:40 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Chuck Norris
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 27 Feb 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 20 Feb 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 19 Feb 2012

23 Feb 2010 Happy 1st Birthday, Tea Party Movement!

28 Apr 2009 The Decline and Fall of Private Education

13 Sep 2011 Feds: No Child's Lunch Left Behind