opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris
6 Nov 2015
A New Definition for Better Living Through Chemistry

Although I have had an interest in the subjects of health and fitness my entire life, I never pretend to be … Read More.

10 Feb 2015
The Defend Freedom Tour

Patrick Henry once said, "The battle, sir, is not to the strong alone; it is to the vigilant, the active, the brave."… Read More.

3 Feb 2015
Operation Digital Delta Force

I was humbled and honored to see on various global news networks how my action movies that were pirated into … Read More.

Obama's Secret Vault


On Glenn Beck's Jan. 7 show, he was rightly puzzled regarding the exact purpose of President Barack Obama's Dec. 16 signing of an executive order "DESIGNATING INTERPOL AS A PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION ENTITLED TO ENJOY CERTAIN PRIVILEGES, EXEMPTIONS, AND IMMUNITIES."

Beck spoke for a host of other government watchdogs when he said on the air: "We've been asking ever since it was signed: Why? Who can tell me what special interest group asked for this? If it were about terror, why not tell us that when he signed it? This Congress attacks our CIA and FBI, but Interpol gets immunity? Why? It makes no sense."

Glenn, I agree. But I think I recently have seen behind the veil on the White House's covert mission and mystery with Interpol.

The rest of Obama's executive order reads: "By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 1 of the International Organizations Immunities Act (22 U.S.C. 288), and in order to extend the appropriate privileges, exemptions, and immunities to the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL), it is hereby ordered that Executive Order 12425 of June 16, 1983, as amended, is further amended by deleting from the first sentence the words 'except those provided by Section 2(c), Section 3, Section 4, Section 5, and Section 6 of that Act' and the semicolon that immediately precedes them."

Critical here is Obama's deletion of Section 2C exceptions, which come from the United States International Organizations Immunities Act: "Property and assets of international organizations, wherever located and by whomsoever held, shall be immune from search, unless such immunity be expressly waived, and from confiscation. The archives of international organizations shall be inviolable." (As ThreatsWatch noted, "Inviolable archives means INTERPOL records are beyond US citizens' Freedom of Information Act requests and from American legal or investigative discovery.")

But why, at this point in U.S. history, would the White House want Interpol to be exempt from the Freedom of Information Act and the regulations of search and seizure? White House and Interpol officials contend that the only reason for Obama's executive order was to update Ronald Reagan's 1983 executive order to accommodate Interpol's permanent residency and bring equity to its standing among other international organizations.

Many in the conservative world have accused Obama of extending Interpol's legal exemptions for the purpose of empowering a global police force, but I believe there's a much closer goal and strategic reason he gave this presidential edict.

And it dawned on me when I read seven words said by Interpol spokeswoman Rachel Billington, who explained to The New York Times the applicable location of the president's executive order: "It's only for the New York office."

"Only for the New York office"? Mm.

Is it possible the Obama administration specifically and soon plans to use Interpol's New York office for some covert purpose that would require Interpol's exemption from having its property or records subject to search and seizure?

Is it merely coincidental that Obama signed this executive order and that New York is the feds' city of choice in which to place 9/11 terrorists on trial in federal court?

Is it merely coincidental that Obama signed this executive order and that the feds now have the close proximity of Interpol archives that are exempt from American legal and investigative discovery and the Freedom of Information Act requests by the media and U.S. citizens?

Is it merely coincidental that Obama signed this executive order and that Interpol's U.S. central operations office is under the umbrella of and within our own Justice Department's offices? (Interpol — which was started in 1923 and is made up of 188 country members, including the U.S. and Yemen — has its bureau in the Department of Justice.)

Is it merely coincidental that Obama signed this executive order and that an Interpol spokeswoman explained that "it's only for the New York office," whose five staff members now have access to law enforcement information submitted by other countries that no U.S. authority, official, agency or citizen can view for any reason (without Interpol's waiver)?

Again, ThreatsWatch hit the nail on the head: Immunity from search and seizure "cannot be understated, because this immunity and protection — and elevation above the US Constitution — afforded INTERPOL is likely a precursor to the White House subjecting the United States under the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court (ICC). INTERPOL provides a significant enforcement function for the ICC, just as our FBI provides a significant function for our Department of Justice."

If international terrorists' criminal records are allowed to pass through or be housed temporarily in New York's Interpol storage bin, they will be as safe as the gold at Fort Knox. Al Capone's vault had nothing on Obama's new Interpol repository!

Of course, it's not too late for the White House to be transparent and confess exactly why Obama granted Interpol's exemption from search and seizure laws at this critical point in the war on terror. What we do know now, however, is why the wisdom of President Reagan limited Interpol's immunities and why Obama's deletions of Reagan's executive order should have stayed intact for this international law enforcement agency.

To find out more about Chuck Norris and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at




2 Comments | Post Comment
Another timely warning, Chuck, thanks. Here's something else to consider that relates, I think, to the concerns you express. I guess it's pretty clear how BHO would classify you, brother.
"According to this new Homeland Security report, all it takes to fit the terrorist profile is to have general anti-government feelings or prefer local/state government to federal control over everything.
In a frightening “Unclassified” Homeland Security Office of Intelligence and Analysis Assessment, coordinated with the FBI – the government declares that “domestic right wing persons” are ”terrorists” engaged in “violent radicalization”, “propaganda” and by extension of the assessment, enemies of the United States.
You read that correctly.
“Domestic Terrorists – are classified as Right Wing Extremists” and according to this assessment – are “the most dangerous domestic terrorist threat in the United States” according to this report.
Not Al Qaeda.
Not Jihad groups training for martyrdom on 35 U.S. training camps.
Not a nuclear Iran with a madman at the button.
Not a Ballistic missile firing North Korea.
Not Somali Muslim Pirates.
No, none of those things are the greatest threat that faces the United States.
According to this document, the “greatest threat to the United States” is from American citizens who reject the tyranny of the federal government, who advocates states rights, who love personal liberties, or opposes Obama's Marxist agenda, Abortion and Illegal Immigration – THEY are the threats according to this DHS “For official Use Only” document given to law enforcement.
So history repeats itself and the beginnings of yet another purge of “dissidents” by a government against it's own people is being crafted.
Stalin had his Ukrainian peasants, Pol Pot had his Western educated intellectuals, and Hitler had his Jews. All groups identified and demonized so that the genocides that followed were accepted and applauded by the populace when totalitarian force was finally applied to eradicate the political opposition to dictatorial Marxist regimes.
So Obama will have his “Right Wing Extremists” as his domestic targets that he is setting up for annihilation by the hand of government and law enforcement.
People like William Ayers, a pal of Obama's – who actually bombed police stations and killed people while part of the Weather Underground, are celebrated and lofted to educators while anyone who clings to guns and the Christian religion – are to be considered ‘Extremists' and ‘terrorists' by government and Law Enforcement.
Here is what the report defines as “Rightwing Extremism”:
Rightwing extremism in the United States can be broadly divided into those groups, movements, and adherents that are primarily hate-oriented (based on hatred of particular religious, racial or ethnic groups), and those that are mainly antigovernment, rejecting federal authority in favor of state or local authority, or rejecting government authority entirely. It may include groups and individuals that are dedicated to a single issue, such as opposition to abortion or immigration.
Read the full document via this link:"
Comment: #1
Posted by: Alan O'Reilly
Tue Jan 12, 2010 10:48 AM
Dear Chuck Norris, Excellent Article. After reading the articles from Howard Galganov, Canada, it seems everyone is uneasy about the future of America.The terrorists know this and they're waiting for their next 9/11! For five (5) decades, politicians have created disaster in America with their social and welfare programs, their hyped-up schemes, thinking how 'they can control Americans! Well, guess what, it's backfired, because they're not one-tenth as smart as they think they are. They've been controlling with their 'tax & spend' programs, thus enlarging government! It's coming back to bite them in the butts!
I thought your readers might want to read some of his work, also, as he, like myself and you, tell it the way it is. Time is of the Essence for Taxpayers to TAKE AMERICA BACK and sell the 'incompetent, corrupt, greedy, bribing, blood-sucking ticks' a one-way ticket to GITMO! Their assets belong to Taxpayers and it's time for them all to pay back what they've taken!
As for the latest bribery ponzi scheme, by Reid, Pelosi, Dodd, Rangel, and the rest of this administration, called ''THEIR NATIONAL HEALTHCARE FOR ALL', no trials needed for any of these ticks as what they've done is highly illegal and since this just didn't start, Taxpayers need to padlock all the doors and send them away immediately! ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!
For over five (5) decades, politicians have used their 'bribery' and 'schemes' to control America; therefore, it's time to TAKE AMERICA BACK! BANKRUPTING AMERICA BY SELLING AMERICANS JOBS TO THE HIGHEST BIDDER FOR THEIR BEST INTERESTS IS UNACCEPTABLE!

Friday, January 08, 2010By: Howard Galganov

Play in a new window

Share This Editorial

It bothered me somewhat to use the headline BULL-SHITTER-IN-CHIEF, only
because BULL-SHITTER is a pretty crass choice of words. So, instead, I
considered the following alternative descriptions:

Platitudener-In-Chief. Liar-In-Chief. Crapola Artist-In Chief. Flimflam
Man-In-Chief. Apologizer-In-Chief. Self-Hating American-In-Chief.
Socialist-In-Chief. Moslem Ass-Kisser-In-Chief. And on and on ad-infinitum.

But, when weighing the multitude of choices, nothing came close to defining
this White House Horror Show-In-Chief as clearly as BULL-SHITTER-IN-CHIEF.

There is nothing about Obama's youth, his education, his working career
(community organizer), his associations, his religious affiliations, or even
where he was really born that isn't a load of BULL-SHIT, since there doesn't
seem to be a real paper trail to substantiate anything about him.

The myth of Obama includes him being a Professor of Law. What? Where is his
doctorate in law or anything else that would make him a genuine professor of

The same BULL-SHIT claims that he is a Constitutional Expert. Oh Yeah, by
what standard?

In his case, he's on a fast track to both.

I heard his so-called CRITICAL speech on Thursday (January 7, 2010) that was
delayed twice while he and the rest of his gang tried to figure out how to
explain to the people of America how absolutely screwed-up and incompetent
they are without actually saying so.

It's like watching a reality show called Amateur Hour At The White House

This was supposed to be the speech that once and for all established Obama's
policies on National Security. It was supposed to name names and PUNISH the
person or people who were in charge and/or responsible for the Christmas Day
Airline Crotch/Bomber Attack.

During this speech, like all of his other teleprompter speeches, he
constantly says I - I - I, such as I will not tolerate this. I will not
permit that. I will get to the bottom of whatever. I will hold people
responsible. I - I - I.

Does the Bull-Shitter-In-Chief understand that America's leadership is built
upon WE opposed to I? Does he confuse his Presidential powers with those of
other Presidents like Hugo Chavez or Castro?

He spoke VERY briefly of a WAR ON AL QAEDA, but NEVER once tying Al Qaeda or
any of the other sick Bastards who want to smash the USA as being Moslems.

He mentioned the word TERRORIST just once. But invested a lot of time and
emphasis on HIS knowledge that MOST Moslems DO NOT SUPPORT Al Qaeda.


Then how can he explain why Moslems in EVERY Moslem and Arab country danced
for joy in the streets throughout the Moslem World while singing and
throwing candies in celebration of 9/11 as the Towers fell?

Besides - Did the Bull-Shitter-In-Chief take a poll to see how many Moslems
hate TERROR attacks on America, opposed to those who relish in the news of
American blood being spilled?

So, where does this Bull-Shitter-In-Chief come off making statements that
take the pressure and responsibility off the shoulders of Moslems?

His logic about NEVER blaming Islam for TERRORIST attacks against the West,
is akin to NEVER blaming men for the rape of women.

He also speaks repeatedly about cooperating and coordinating with his

Who are these partners he's teaming America up with? Yemen, Afghanistan,
Pakistan, Saudi Arabia. Now that's something to make every American feel
safe and secure don't you think?

And finally - He EMPHASIZED the need to connect the dots.

To the Bull-Shitter-In-Chief, connecting the dots will be his greatest
nightmare and ultimate undoing when enough Americans who voted for him a
little over a year ago begin to connect the dots about him.

And if anyone thinks for a second that that's not going to happen BIG TIME,
and isn't already happening now, just ask the Democrat RATS like Chris Dodd
who are already deserting the sinking ship.

In a totally unrelated subject:

I receive a great many emails applauding the editorial I published on July
23, 2009 titled: I TOLD YOU SO - YES I DID. But I also receive a great deal
of criticism for writing that Obama might have been a naturalized citizen,
or something like that.

The truth; is that I never wrote anything about Obama being a naturalized
citizen or anything of the-such. Someone took my editorial and added his or
her comments, and sent it off as if it was the original. IT WAS NOT.

To read the original editorial as it was written, just copy and paste the

If you want to hear a 24-minute audio editorial of what else I think of the
Bull-Shitter-In-Chief, and why he's the best thing for the long-term future
of Freedom in the USA and around the world, click on the Radio Icon at the
Top Right Hand Side of this Page.

And once again - THANK YOU to all the people who contributed towards our
battle against the LEFT, especially knowing one of the very big differences
between Conservatives and Liberals, is that Conservatives fight out of OUR
pockets - while Liberals fight out of OUR pockets.

Best Regards . . . Howard Galganov

Canada Is Not A Bilingual Country!


Let us PLEDGE to fight against the SOMETHING-FOR-NOTHING Bunch with every
fiber in our being.

What Airline TERRORIST Attack?


Alberta Can Save Canada By Leaving

If anything can BEST define Canada, it is the TYRANNY of the impoverished
and underachieving minority.

Jerks Vote For Jerks Who Sign What They Don't Read

It is said that people get the government they deserve. But I say that not
all people deserve the government they get.

We Owe Obama A HUGE Debt Of Gratitude - Yes We Do.

Not ONLY will Obama go down in history as the WORST President ever. Obama
will go down as the MOST HATED PRESIDENT EVER.

The Cesspool Runneth-Over

Crap For Brains doesn't even begin to explain it.

A Global Fraud Like None Other

Our immediate concern is to limit the damage that is being done and will be
done by the LEFTISTS between now and then.

The War On Small Business

Where was it carved in stone along the way that I am my Brother's Keeper?


Even though a Delusional Narcissist occupies the Oval Office, and is leading
his nation and the entire world to the edge of the abyss . . . I STILL

A Worthless Speech From A Worthless President

I guess it's a different story when the talking ends and the walking begins.

Timely Medicine - Not

Why kill something that is really good, only because it's not perfect?

Give Me A Reason Besides BECAUSE

Do the people want the usual suspects in office to continue the politics of
incompetence and cronyism?

Finally A Hero

The United States of America is a country that NEEDS heroes.

The Inmates Are Running The White House Asylum

WHY? - Why is Obama doing all these horrible things to his own country?

"Extremism In The Defense Of Liberty Is No Vice.
And Moderation In The Pursuit Of Justice Is No Virtue"
US Senator, Barry Goldwater




Home | Editorials | Media Links | Books & Gifts | Contact Us
Copyright© 2010,
Comment: #2
Posted by: Shirley deLong
Sun Jan 17, 2010 4:43 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right: comments policy
Chuck Norris
Nov. `15
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 30 Nov 2015
Deb Saunders
Debra J. SaundersUpdated 29 Nov 2015
Mark Shields
Mark ShieldsUpdated 28 Nov 2015

14 Jan 2014 Obama Bullying Nuns (Part 2)

4 May 2010 Give Me Liberty Or...

12 Aug 2014 How Obama's Leadership Cripples America (Part 2)