Nancy Pelosi vs. Rush Limbaugh
Despite the fact that a recent poll found that Americans now believe (by a 3-1 ratio) gas prices are a bigger problem than global warming, The Washington Post noted that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., an avid opponent of offshore drilling, vows to block a drilling vote and even dialogue from occurring on the House floor. And Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., echoed the same sentiment when he eliminated energy amendments to his anti-speculation bill. At the same time, Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Robert Byrd, D-W.Va., canceled committee consideration of spending bills for fear that Republicans would include drilling amendments.
When President Bush recently lifted the executive ban on offshore drilling, the ball was placed completely in Congress' court to take the next move. But instead of Congress representing the majority of Americans' wishes to drill for domestic oil, they once again are favoring a minority. Pelosi justified their inactivity by blaming the president: "What we're saying is, 'Exhaust other remedies, Mr. President.' … It is the economic life of America's families, and to suggest that drilling offshore is going to make a difference to them paycheck to paycheck now is a frivolous contention."
My first reaction to Pelosi's recent congressional energy rebellion was to say, "What an anti-American, anti-reality-based form of representation." To pass the buck back onto the president to "exhaust other remedies" when he took the first step in opening the way for drilling is not only a relinquishing of congressional duties but also another deliberate political avoidance to help the majority of Americans. Two years ago, before taking the congressional helm, Pelosi blamed the president for the energy crisis. Now, instead of providing any solutions at all, she still is blaming the president. Instead of spending her valuable time leading Congress in resolving our energy crisis, she's kicking off a national tour to support her new book, "Know Your Power: A Message to America's Daughters." Is she in political la-la land?!
So just when I was about to go hit the punching bag (again) to alleviate my congressional stress, Rush Limbaugh helped to relieve my tension on his national broadcast. He spoke (again) for the majority of Americans (including me) against Pelosi's desire to tap into the Strategic Petroleum Reserve: "But (about) that strategic reserve oil, a question, ladies and gentlemen: How do we get it? Maybe somebody should call the speaker of the House, send a note to her office: 'Mrs. Pelosi, you want to release 700 million barrels from the strategic reserve. How did it get there? We had to drill for it, didn't we?' I mean, if she wants the 700 million barrels released in order to help with the price, which is not going to do that much, it's not that much oil. It's a one-time thing you can do. The oil had to be drilled. So drilling will lead to relief. We can drill our way out of this. We drilled our way into the strategic reserve."
There's something soothing that happens when someone on such a national scale as Rush Limbaugh speaks for you, which is exactly what's supposed to happen with our representatives — especially the leader of our representatives — but often doesn't. Compare the inept inactivity of Nancy Pelosi on this gas crisis with the informed activity of conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh. Rush is politically savvy; Pelosi is politically cunning. Rush confronts government gridlock; Pelosi creates it. Rush gives solutions; Pelosi ground-n-pounds them. Rush says to drill here and drill now; Pelosi says not to drill now or later. Rush motivates Americans to action; Pelosi paralyzes the House to inaction. I would bet Rush has had more positive influence on Congress through the years by his broadcasts than Pelosi ever will from her House throne. If only Rush would seriously consider a run for her seat!
While I'm not espousing we canonize Rush and haven't always agreed with him, I thank God for him and join with so many across the land in celebrating the 20th anniversary of his national broadcasts Aug. 1. He truly is a father of modern conservative commentary. And he is a model of intelligence, perseverance and might for us all, despite personal and political setbacks. He is a leader of leaders among that league of extraordinary gentlemen and conservative cultural crusaders — such as Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, Bill O'Reilly, Dick Morris, Newt Gingrich, Ann Coulter, John Kasich and Frank Pastore, to name a few — and, of course, a host of other conservative columnists, blogs and Web sites. I had the good fortune this past year of being among just a few others in an intimate dinner with Rush, and I found him to be every bit the gentleman, political and cultural sage, and quick-witted commentator in person as he is on radio.
Congratulations, Rush, on 20 years of broadcasting excellence, and many blessings on your next 20! Together, with all of our conservative voices, I hope we can turn around the waning passion of conservatives and liberal tides of our cultural war before it's too late. Most of all, I pray that we ultimately inspire a new generation of patriots who will fight on-air, on the Internet and in congressional halls with a fire like Patrick Henry had rather than what Nancy Pelosi has.
To find out more about Chuck Norris and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.
COPYRIGHT 2008 CHUCK NORRIS
DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.

|
 |
Comments
|
6 Comments | Post Comment
|
|
Thanks for the update, Chuck. I think you folk over there will have to do something to re-invigorate your oil-based economy. The picture is complicated because the collapse of sub-prime mortgages also affects the US economy seriously but restriction of oil supplies clearly won't help repair a situation that I believe is starting hit even middle America hard. I was listening to a talk the other day by a British political leader who visited the US recently. He said that with the decline of industry in the US and the credit crunch, many suburban homes around Detroit, formerly occupied by automotive factory workers, had been deserted and the wilderness was taking over, with deer and other wild animals now being sighted within about a mile of Detroit's city centre. About a tenth of young professional workers and their families in the state are now on emergency relief, he said, not simply social security but emergency relief.
With deer in the area, I wonder if it will be bears and cougars next?
He also said that out in California, the desert was reclaiming many homes also abandoned in the current economic downturn. In that area, owing to low rainfall, the front gardens and shrubs quickly die off but in the back yards, the swimming pools, which are apparently in most of these homes, become a breeding ground for mosquitoes because the chlorine evaporates in a few days after the former home owners depart. These mosquitoes evidently carry Nile Fever and so far 6 victims have actually died of it, a small number but a sinister warning of what may come.
I guess we have to put this down to the Lord's judgement and also as an indication of His approaching Return. But inflated gasoline prices won't help struggling US families, that's for sure.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Alan O'Reilly
Wed Jul 30, 2008 8:57 AM
|
|
|
|
Hey Chuck!
Stick to making KARATE MOVIES OK? If you had any political acumen at all the last person you would support would be our current Prseident!
Comment: #2
Posted by: Kevin L Young
Wed Jul 30, 2008 2:36 PM
|
|
|
|
Hey Chuck:
By the way ole Rush is running a close second to the idiot that will exit the white house in a few month! He's higher than ever, if you know what I mean!
Comment: #3
Posted by: Kevin L Young
Wed Jul 30, 2008 2:38 PM
|
|
|
|
Yeah, thanks for the update, Chuck. So let me get this straight. You are a guy who fancies he's guided by God. Do you think God really cares if the polls show that Americans think by a three to one margin that gas prices are a bigger problem than global warming? .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Actually, I think God does care, and I would wager that she isn't very happy about humans pissing all over the beautiful planet she gave us, letting so many of the beautiful creatures she created just expire on a bed of concrete because they don't serve the purpose of money, greed, and indifference to the holy natural balance she created. ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
You are not any more guided by God than is a common criminal. You're kind of an idolator. Rush (the drug addict) and the polls are what you worship. Not to mention the good old buck. Where the herd wants to go is where the fame and fortune are, isn't it? .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
I would say you should stick to karate movies, as Mr. Young advises, and particularly the fantasy aspects of them. But be careful, you can't afford afford any more kicks to the head.
Comment: #4
Posted by: Masako
Wed Jul 30, 2008 7:10 PM
|
|
|
|
Chuck won't read these. He would, like the president, need a coloring book to check for his latest numbers in the polls. YIKES! What would drilling NOW do? Nothing. There are no drilling platforms available, there are few really skilled workers to man any drilling platforms, and if they got the oil out before 2016, where would they refine it? Takes that long to build a refinery and even then, the results would amount to about 3-4c/gallon difference. Even Chuck "kick 'em danno" Norris knows how to figure 1,2, 3. Of course, his SUVs and HumVees require Super Premium fuel at thee $5/gallon (at this time) to power his 7-10mpg in the city bus. However, as much money as he makes he better not be caught counting pennies. Da guy is a jerk in the first place and a bigger jerk in the second to realize the drilling is more feasible than finding alternative sources. Maybe he ought sit down with T Boon Pickens and talk reality here. So, we get all this oil, Chucky boy, when we run out of it, what then? You want to wait until that last minute to start an alternative energy source? I can see the Chuckles with the deer in the headlights look in his eyes. DUH might be the first words out of his mouth.
Comment: #5
Posted by: olin thompson
Sun Aug 3, 2008 11:32 AM
|
|
|
|
My, but you're a friendly bunch. <> Mr. Thompson: While you raise several good points--those regarding the logistics of drilling immediately--you likewise miss some elements of the bigger picture. You seem certain that we should leave the oil reserves we have in the ground, and apply ourselves to alternative sources. You make the unfortunate reference to Mr. Pickens, who stands to profit immensely, due to his financial stake in natural gas and wind farms (look it up), should we take up VP Gore's challenge, or follow Pickens's advice. Here's a challenge to you: please name an alternative energy source that will NOT be more expensive than oil. <> Mr. Young: Actually, given Pres. Bush's 35% approval rating, which must include at least a few people with "political acumen", may I suggest your claim is false? Check out Congress's 9% approval rating under the leadership of Speaker Pelosi and Sen. Reid. Oh, and as for your comment about Rush Limbaugh...please proof read your posts, so they have intelligible meaning. <> Masako: Your post is full of invective, judgment, and harsh words, but practically devoid of meaningful content. You're obviously not happy with the state of affairs, but you also don't address any of the issues with suggestions, practical, or otherwise. Surely you can contribute to meaningful discussion. <> Mr. O'Reilly: Thanks for showing us Americans how posting should be done. Your political leader correctly described some of the problems we have to deal with on "this side of the pond". Some of us look at things like the desert housing in California and wonder, "What were they thinking?" There are significant difficulties in that state, with everyone wanting to live/work within a few miles of the coast. <> Now, to the article by Mr. Norris: Excellent tribute to Rush Limbaugh, and the hope in the storm that he has provided for conservatives the past 20 years. More than once I have been pulled out of discouragement by hearing his optimistic take on current events. I look forward to getting his take on things, five days a week, and find myself missing him and other friendly commentators on Saturday. He has helped motivate me to keep my congressional representative informed of what I consider the key issues facing Congress, and how they should be dealt with. <> All the best to you, Chuck, and also to you who have posted comments.
Comment: #6
Posted by: davd w pennington
Mon Aug 4, 2008 5:08 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|