creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris
16 Sep 2014
America at the Tipping Point (Part 3)

The CIA reported this past Thursday that the number of Islamic State fighters is actually three times what … Read More.

9 Sep 2014
America at the Tipping Point (Part 2)

We said on 9/11 that we'd "never forget." But when our president has a no-strategy strategy for stopping … Read More.

2 Sep 2014
America at the Tipping Point (Part 1)

Is history going to repeat itself? I recently read the book "The Miracle of Freedom: 7 Tipping Points That … Read More.

Holy Week, Holy Shariah? (Part 1)

Comment

As most Americans have done since our republic's inception, millions of us across the country this Holy Week will commemorate the crucifixion and resurrection of Jesus Christ. But what concerns me in America is not only the growing disdain for Christian sentiment but also the increasing spread of Shariah.

There's no mystery that radical Islamists intend to use the freedoms in our Constitution to expand the influence of Shariah. But still, too many Americans don't know or understand how it threatens the very fabric of our republic. So I've decided to do a series on how Shariah is seeping into American society.

First, let me categorically state that I'm not an Islamophobe. I welcome the plurality of religions in America and am a firm believer in the First Amendment. But just as our religious freedom is secured in the Bill of Rights, so is our freedom of speech to share even our religious concerns.

For those who might not know, the Arabic term "Shariah" literally means "the path to be followed," denoting its nature as a guide for a blessed life. Shariah is derived from both the Quran (the Muslim holy book) and Sunna (Islamic custom, piety and practice). In short, Shariah is Islamic law, a religious code for living; it is a system of moral, religious, social and civic laws. Shariah details and decrees proper benevolence, prayers, fasting, dress, business practices, marital and relational conduct, sexual offenses, custody, contracts, inheritance, etc.

Shariah has been adopted in different ways by various countries, ranging from a narrow and strict interpretation in Saudi Arabia and northern states of Nigeria to a loose and liberal interpretation in much of Malaysia. Some Shariah offenses are criminal and require imprisonment. Others incur hudud, a class of penalties including stoning, flogging and amputation. There are five crimes that are punishable by hudud: sex outside of marriage and adultery, false accusation of unlawful sexual intercourse, wine drinking (sometimes extended to include all alcohol drinking), theft and highway robbery.

Though most Islamic states have adopted elements of Shariah into law, only some have adopted hudud, including Iran, Saudi Arabia, Nigeria and Pakistan (though the latter is lax in enforcement). Egypt, Syria, Jordan and Lebanon have not adopted hudud. And other countries, such as Turkey, have essentially abandoned Shariah in favor of new law codes based on European systems.

But the main point here is this: Where Islam and Islamic culture have spread, Shariah has shortly followed.

Of course, many Americans watching a video of a Middle Eastern woman allegedly caught in adultery be buried in the ground up to her head and stoned to death would think, "That could never happen in America." But they fail to see how Shariah already has been enabled and subtly invoked in our country and that any induction of it is by understated, lukewarm changes, like a frog boiled in a kettle by a slow simmer.

For those who don't believe in that Shariah simmer, consider that in just the past few months:

—A Florida judge ruled that a dispute between Muslim parties could proceed under Shariah.

"This case," the judge wrote, "will proceed under Ecclesiastical Islamic Law."

—Alabama is joining a growing list of states that are considering outlawing the use of foreign and religious laws, specifically Shariah, in their courts.

—President Barack Obama's adviser on Muslim affairs, Dalia Mogahed, appeared on a British television show hosted by a member of an extremist group to talk about Shariah. Mogahed said that the Western view of Shariah is "oversimplified" and that the majority of women around the world associate it with "gender justice." Does she really think that Shariah is the ideological bastion of gender equality?

In the end, it seems to me we have a choice to believe that Shariah is or is not a pro-Islamic system of civic, religious, moral and social laws that is being used to run other countries and governments but that should not be invoked to run ours based upon the belief that our constitutional republic is inferior.

Many think we should just drink the Kool-Aid and adopt the "very small" changes of Shariah, as Sheik Ibrahim Mogra described them when being questioned about its influence in Great Britain: "We're looking at a very small aspect of Shariah for Muslim families when they choose to be governed with regards to their marriage, divorce, inheritance, custody of children and so forth."

Then again, maybe Mogra explained between the lines everything we need to know when he said: "It is very complex; it is not as straightforward as saying that we will have a system (in Britain). We do not wish to see a parallel system or a separate system of judiciary for Muslims. ... We've seen examples of this in Ontario in Canada and in Singapore, where systems have worked very well."

(In the next few articles, I will be discussing "3 Ways Most Americans Enable Shariah," "The Top 10 U.S. Shariah Infiltrations," "Shariah vs. The U.S. Constitution" and "Shariah vs. Biblical Law in the U.S." For more information on Shariah, I recommend "Muslim Mafia," by P. David Gaubatz and Paul Sperry.)

To find out more about Chuck Norris and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2011 CHUCK NORRIS

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM



Comments

2 Comments | Post Comment
I have to say on this occasion Chuck that Islamophobia is one of the greatest assets that you can have in this war. Quite simply, the US, like the UK, is Dar-al-Harb, the House of War i.e. any non-Moslem country. All such nations must be forced into Dar-al-Islam, the House of Islam by the various forms of jihad. This is certainly the verdict of Nigerian Christian G.J.O. Moshay in Who is This Allah? p 25, describing Moslem tactics. He also shows that our politicians and law enforcement officers are stupid where they think that 'radicalization' or 'extremism' are add-ons via 'militants.' They have been germane to Moslems for 1400 years and are now.
"Migrate to Christian areas because they are tolerant. Pretend to be peaceful, friendly and hospitable; begin to clamour for religious political and social rights and privileges that you will not allow to Christians in an Islamic country; breed fast there and settle down; there should be no Christian activities in your community; you may speak or write to discredit their religion, but they must not talk about Islam; begin to expand your community; Christian activities should be restricted in all the places you expand to; the moment you have enough military might against these ‘disbelievers', these trinitarian kaferis, go ahead and eliminate them or suppress them as much as you can, and be in control."
Moshay concludes "Where immediate invasion is not possible, that has always been the policy."
This is what we are seeing in the UK. I suggest Chuck that you and Gena get the whole Walker gang about you for prayer on this one. You'll all need it.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Alan O'Reilly
Tue Apr 19, 2011 7:57 AM
MUSLIM RADICALS COMPARE CLOSELY WITH FABIAN SOCIALISTS IN TERMS OF STRATEGIES. THEY SHARE THE CONCEPT THAT ANY ACTION WHICH PROGRESSES THEIR POSITION IS MORALLY RIGHTEOUS-- IT MATTERS NOT HOW SINFUL, EVIL, MURDEROUS OR CRIMINALLY OUTRAGEOUS THEY MAY BE. IT'S AS IF MOHAMMAD AND MARX ATTENDED THE SAME ANARCHISTIC SCHOOL. THEY BOTH ADHERE TO THE SLOW-GO, NO HURRY SCHEME OF NATION CAPTURE. THEY BOTH REALIZE THAT CONVERSION TO THEIR CONTROL AND PUBLIC POWER, IF PUSHED TOO FAST, WILL BE THROWN OUT.
ANY IDEA THAT EVEN THE SMALLEST AREA OF AMERICAN SOIL SHOULD CONFORM TO THE MUSLIM IDEAS OF RIGHT AND WRONG ARE ABSURDLY STUPID. IN AMERICAN, RELIGION DOES NOT DICTATE LAW, TO MUSLIMS OR AMERICANS. WHEN AN IMMIGRANT, OF WHATEVER ORIGIN SEEKS U.S. HABITATION, HE IS SWORN TO OBEY THE LAWS OF AMERICA-- IF HE IS NOT AGREEABLE LET HIM GO ELSEWHERE. WE ARE ALREADY IN DEEP TROUBLE ECONOMICALLY, SIMPLY BECAUSE, SINCE 1913, WE HAVE EXPERIENCED AND GOVERNMENTALLY ABSORBED A SLOW BUT CONSTANT MARXIAN POISON IN- TO THIS REPUBLIC'S BLOODSTREAM. WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO BRING US TO OUR PRESENT HYPER DILEMMA WAS FORETOLD BY MARGARET THATCHER IN A QUESTION TO SOCIALIST LEADERS IN LONDON:
"WHAT WILL YOU DO WHEN YOU RUN OUT OF OTHER PEOPLE'S MONEY?"
THIS VEILED INTERROGATIVE WARNING IS PRECISELY DEFINITIVE FOR OUR PRESENT ECONOMIC DISASTER.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Ray harbin
Mon May 2, 2011 2:29 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Chuck Norris
Sep. `14
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 1 2 3 4
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 22 Sep 2014
Deb Saunders
Debra J. SaundersUpdated 21 Sep 2014
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 21 Sep 2014

24 May 2011 The Self-Destructing Republican Party?

17 Apr 2012 Video Proof of Voter Fraud in DC

7 Oct 2008 The Bailaholics