creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris
14 Feb 2012
Why I Chose Newt Over Santorum

In 2008 — when my wife, Gena, and I were on the campaign trail backing former Arkansas Gov. Mike … Read More.

7 Feb 2012
Waging War on the Trifecta of Tyranny

As a six-time undefeated middleweight world karate champion, I have a pretty good idea what makes a warrior. … Read More.

31 Jan 2012
Proof Voters Are Smarter Than Media and Washington Elite

I think the mainstream media and Washington elite think the majority of voters just fell off the turnip truck.… Read More.

Dirty Secret No. 4 in Obamacare

Share Comment

Flying under the radar this past week was a new government report that forecasts that the national debt will double over the next decade. The White House has projected a cumulative $9 trillion deficit between 2010 and 2019, while the Congressional Budget Office estimates a more optimistic $7.1 trillion, based upon the expiration of Bush tax cuts. What this means is that Washington's out-of-control spending likely will turn the nation's already-staggering $11 trillion in debt into an astronomical $20 trillion.

But there are at least two ginormous expenses that are excluded in these projections. First, the projections from both the White House and CBO incorporate their belief that the deficit will decline quickly over the next three years, as they assume fewer bailouts are needed and the economy will grow rapidly. But isn't there also the real possibility that the economy will not recover as quickly as they hope? Every additional bailout or stimulus (large or small) and every margin of error in their three-year prospective climb out of the economic pit will inflate our nation's debt balloon even more.

The second expense is far less speculative — and it has to do with about a fourth of America. The 72 million baby boomers (people born in America from 1946 to 1964), members of the largest generation America has produced, are going into retirement over the next two decades and will face the golden years of declining health and rising medical costs. Under current law, if the government were to add the projected baby boomer costs of Medicare and Social Security to its debt tab, it would send deficit projections into the abyss.

Here's the primary problem. Medicare is bankrupt. Medicaid is bankrupt. And Social Security is bankrupt. Though boomers have paid into these programs via their taxes for decades, there are not enough benefits to offer them now — and even less in the future. The problem is compounded when one understands that the number of people in the United States who are 65 or older is expected to double by 2030, and so is the amount expected to fund their retirement and health care in their twilight years, which relatively few are prepared to handle themselves.

So what is the U.S. government to do, especially when it already is projected to have $20 trillion worth of debt in 2019? (Let alone what it will be in 2030!)

That reform is needed in health care is not a question, mostly because Americans are being raped by the insurance companies.

But Obamacare in its present form is not the answer, because it progressively would cut (yes, cut) the care for baby boomers in the future, if not through the reductions and costs of private options then through the mandatory benefit cuts the government would have to make in Social Security and Obamacare (formerly Medicare). Think about it. If government can't handle the costs of the elderly now in retirement via its Medicare and Social Security programs, do we really expect they will offer the baby boomers better (and more costly) benefits in the future?

According to a CBO report called "Baby Boomers' Retirement Prospects": "Present trends are unlikely to persist indefinitely, however, because total payments to retirees are expected to grow much faster under current law than either the total incomes of workers who pay Social Security and Medicare taxes or the revenues earmarked for those programs. That widening gap will place increasing stress on both programs. Narrowing the gap could involve slowing the future growth of benefits."

Notice the words "under current law" and "slowing the future growth of benefits"? That is key. The only way around this future financial dilemma (according to this administration, at least) is to change "current law" and to "slow" or lower the benefits for baby boomers. That new law (or basic legislation upon which such changes can be amended) is Obamacare.

Look closely at the political prescription from the CBO's same boomer report: "The extent to which baby boomers are providing for their own retirement — and have time to react to policy changes (emphasis added) — is thus an important consideration in evaluating proposals to reform the Social Security and Medicare programs." The only way the boomers will "have time to react to policy changes" is if they are enacted before they go into retirement! (Are you catching another reason for the White House's rush to pass this legislation?!)

This is dirty secret No. 4 in Obamacare that our government isn't telling you: Obamacare ultimately is designed to force retiring baby boomers into a much cheaper version of socialized medicine than Medicare, which already is being positioned to be cut to the tune of $500 billion. Obamacare is not merely about reforming health care to aid 47 million Americans who are uninsured. It is about reforming "current law" to ax 72 million retiring Americans, whom the government can't afford to support over the next two decades.

To find out more about Chuck Norris and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2009 CHUCK NORRIS

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM

??

 

??

 

??

 

??


Comments

3 Comments | Post Comment
CHUCK- Is there any way to stop this charade and the destruction of our country and the total defiling of our Constitution by the dual-israhelli citizens, zionists, and jews that totally control our federal government, news media, financial systems, food supply, and that dictate US policy like arming these disgusting kikes with nuclear weapons or the kike scum opening the flood gates of third world mud immigration to destroy our country from within, except by a roundup and total removal of these evil, immoral genetic devils and child murderers and purveyors of pornography and drugs?

Please answer carefully and do not excuse the jew out of fear. The Truth stands on the massive evidence of the jew involvement in every atrocity and immoral disgusting degeneracy and includes the murder and mutilation of innocent women and children in Palestine.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Biggs2
Tue Sep 1, 2009 7:11 AM
Dear Chuck Norris, Thanks for article! Taxpayers wonder whats going to happen when America doesn't pay 'JUST THE INTEREST' on the trillions they've borrowed, without Taxpayers consent? Taxpayers are sure that paying doesn't really matter to the recipients of social and welfare program, as long as they can have illegitimates and collect Taxpayers money that they're not entitled to!

'Heartbeat of America' - textile and furniture manufacturing businesses
making and selling their goods; therefore, being able to buy homes, cars,
and food for their families. Politicians took this away from hard-working
Taxpaying Americans with their 'Free Trade', stating America would become a
service country. Really, the only servicing being done now is unemployment,
social and welfare offices! Are Taxpayers getting any benefits from this
type governing?

"We need affordable, accessible healthcare for all!" and "Do something for
people who are uninsured" make Taxpayers wonder why these people, writing
these articles, don't get together and charge everyone $100.00 to attend a
meeting and do something constructive; that is, you could take out a good
health insurance plan and look after yourselves, as this is the only way it's
going to happen, because America is bankrupt or haven't you noticed!

Politicians "Do as we say, not as we do" is quite evident in townhall
meetings! They're not interested in me, you nor our comments!

I, personally, was "forced" to take Medicare and their drug plan' (real
jokes). I was happy with my private insurance plan and the deductible. Prior
to politicians' mess, doctor visits were less. The politicians stated "I had
to do it their way or else!" Needless to say, I wasn't a happy camper!
Medicare, Medicaid, Healthcare disaster, and anything else the politicians
can drum up to take your money is very scary! 'Explanation of Benefit' a
recent statement I received regarding this government rip off! My Doctor
billed for $233.00, Medicare paid $76.20, private carrier paid $19.05! Can
you see the problem here? Office visits, paid for by me, the patient, at
$50.00, the doctors would be getting a lot more money, less papework, and
government wouldn't have access to all your records, which, incidentally,
can be used against you - in case you didn't know!

In plain English, Taxpayers would be better off with their own insurance and
their own money! If I were a doctor, I'd be sitting on the front steps of
all politicians until they went back to 'pay as you go', thus saving
trillions of dollars! Better yet, Taxpayers should set up, with a good,
honest insurance company, and manage a Insurance Trust for doctors and
hospitals, interest bearing Fund (at a bank that didn't take TARP money),
have all Americans pay $100.00 each month for each person, and this way,
everyone can be insured, pay their 'fair share', and cut out the stealing by
the 'blood-sucking ticks'. In the old days, when integrity, honesty and
respest stood for something people paid their own way, paid their own
doctors and hospitals, and America wasn't bankrupt then! I wonder why?

"Millions face shrinking Social Security Payments" todays' headlines!
Politicians robbed the system to pay for all social and welfare programs,
which, of course, these people weren't entitled.

Folks, can't you see that Taxpayers are paying for all the extra offices,
the trips, the lunches, the fine healthcare, etc. for politicians, while we're
doing without?

America is now an enslaved nation with trillions of dollars in debt and all
because of deceit and greed. I'm quoting John Adams - "There are two ways to
conquer and enslave a nation. One is by the sword, the other is by debt."
Surely, you remember history and the Dictator that said "We'll destroy
America and never lift a finger!" If this doesn't wake you up, nothing will!

At no time have Taxpayers heard the words "We, the politicians, in order to
pay off trillions we borrowed without Taxpayers consent, are going to reduce
our benefits, salaries and retirements to $12,000.00 yearly!"

Comment: #2
Posted by: Shirley deLong
Tue Sep 1, 2009 7:49 AM
OT Chuck but I think the following encapsulates what ordinary Americans are up against. Tomorrow is the 70th anniversary of when the UK declared war on another tyrant. Captain HIll's letter shows that some of the WW2 grit still survives. The opening sentence is introductory. "Some of us witnessed the arrogance of Barbara Boxer (CA) as she admonished a brigadier general because he addressed her as "ma'am" and not "Senator" before a Senate hearing. This letter is from a National Guard aviator and Captain for Alaska Airlines. I wonder what he would have said if he were really angry.
Jim Hill's Letter to Barbara Boxer
"You were so right on when you scolded the general on TV for using the term, "ma'am," instead of "Senator". After all, in the military, "ma'am" is a term of respect when addressing a female of superior rank or position. The general was totally wrong. You are not a person of superior rank or position. You are a member of one of the world's most corrupt organizations, the U.S. Senate, equaled only by the U.S. House of Representatives.
Congress is a cesspool of liars, thieves, inside traders, traitors, drunks (one who killed a staffer, yet is still revered), criminals, and other low level swine who, as individuals (not all, but many), will do anything to enhance their lives, fortunes and power, all at the expense of the People of the United States and its Constitution, in order to be continually re-elected. Many democrats even want American troops killed by releasing photographs. How many of you could honestly say, "We pledge our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor"? None? One? Two? Your reaction to the general shows several things. First is your abysmal ignorance of all things military. Your treatment of the general shows you to be an elitist of the worst kind. When the general entered the military (as most of us who served) he wrote the government a blank check, offering his life to protect your derriere, now safely and comfortably ensconced in a 20 thousand dollar leather chair, paid for by the general's taxes. You repaid him for this by humiliating him in front of millions.
Second is your puerile character, lack of sophistication, and arrogance which borders on the hubristic. This display of brattish behavior shows you to be a virago, termagant, harridan, nag, scold or shrew, unfit for your position, regardless of the support of the unwashed, uneducated masses who have made California into the laughing stock of the nation.
What I am writing, Senator, are the same thoughts countless millions of Americans have toward Congress, but who lack the energy, ability or time to convey them. Under the democrats, some don't even have the 44 cents to buy the stamp. Regardless of their thoughts, most realize that politicians are pretty much the same, and will vote for the one who will bring home the most bacon, even if they do consider how corrupt that person is. Lord Acton (1834 - 1902) so aptly charged, "Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely." Unbeknownst to you and your colleagues, "Mr. Power" has had his way with all of you, and we are all the worse for it.
Finally Senator, I, too, have a title. It is "Right Wing Extremist Potential Terrorist Threat." It is not of my choosing, but was given to me by your Secretary of Homeland Security, Janet Napolitano. And you were offended by "ma'am"?
Have a fine day. Cheers!
Jim Hill 16808 - 103rd Avenue Court East South Hill, WA 98374""
Comment: #3
Posted by: Alan O'Reilly
Wed Sep 2, 2009 10:29 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Chuck Norris
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Judge Napolitano
Judge Andrew P. NapolitanoUpdated 16 Feb 2012
Lawrence Kudlow
Lawrence KudlowUpdated 16 Feb 2012
Austin Bay
Austin BayUpdated 15 Feb 2012

27 Dec 2011 Feds' War on Religion (Part 2 of 2)

6 Jan 2009 Invasion USA

19 Oct 2010 8 Steps To Rebuild America's Economy (Part 3)