creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris
14 Feb 2012
Why I Chose Newt Over Santorum

In 2008 — when my wife, Gena, and I were on the campaign trail backing former Arkansas Gov. Mike … Read More.

7 Feb 2012
Waging War on the Trifecta of Tyranny

As a six-time undefeated middleweight world karate champion, I have a pretty good idea what makes a warrior. … Read More.

31 Jan 2012
Proof Voters Are Smarter Than Media and Washington Elite

I think the mainstream media and Washington elite think the majority of voters just fell off the turnip truck.… Read More.

Clandestine Conservatives in Hollywood

Share Comment

As I was being interviewed recently at my Texas ranch by Geraldo Rivera, I thought back over my four decades in acting and how the pool of conservative "tough guys" seems to be drying up in Hollywood. Or are liberal waters just getting too hot for conservatives?

Then I recalled that The Washington Times recently reported, "A group of politically conservative and centrist Hollywood figures (up to 600 at once) organized by actor Gary Sinise and others has been meeting quietly in restaurants and private homes, forming a loose-knit network of entertainers who share common beliefs like supporting U.S. troops and traditional American values." But the article also noted that the secret is out on these clandestine meetings, as conservatives progressively are becoming more and more emboldened.

In a so-called age of tolerance, it amazes me just how intolerant some people are of those who stand for traditional values. For example, if I stand against California's memorializing of Harvey Milk Day or stand for California's Proposition 8, which would create an amendment to the California Constitution to safeguard heterosexual purity in marriage (which I do support and encourage Gov. Schwarzenegger and all Californians to do the same), I'm considered by many to be intolerant and a bigot. But if another actor takes just the opposite positions on those measures, he is considered to be compassionate and a liberator. Or when a liberal candidate, such as Hillary Clinton, runs for president, her candidacy is considered a fulfillment of civil rights and women's suffrage. But when a conservative candidate, such as Sarah Palin, runs for vice president, she's considered a radical right-wing extremist who could usurp the Capitol by toting rifles at her side.

This is America, and we should respect the fact that we will have strong, diverse opinions, and we must allow one another the freedom of speech to air such opines, not suppress them through peer pressure of any type like children. I have many acting friends and many friends in politics. I vehemently disagree with some of them, and that is my American right, as it is theirs. We must agree to disagree agreeably, without blogging about or denigrating someone's life and character before the nation and rest of the world. We must do better at keeping the focus on the fact that we are Americans first; we are not just conservatives and liberals.

If we are going to move our country forward, if it is going to survive and flourish for the next generation, then we have to drop the partisan rancor and pick up a unified patriotism — not the patriotism of the past eight years or even the past 18 years, but the patriotism of unified spirit and passion shown by early Americans.

What was important to them, what they fought for, was not the left or the right, but being American and being free. We've got to get back to that form of patriotism — one that is based upon the Constitution, not congressional corruption, and elects people for their character, not their charisma. These are the type of citizens and leaders who don't go deeper into debt to bail out debt. These are the type of citizens and leaders who will say enough is enough. Like Ron Paul, who, after drawing similarities between the $700 billion bailout and the Great Depression, said, "The only thing we learn from history, I am afraid, is that we do not learn from history." (Getting to the heart of America's Founders' beliefs — their patriotism and answers to our problems — is also at the heart of why I wrote my latest New York Times best-seller, "Black Belt Patriotism.")

I admire those in the recent past who were able to represent a respectful conservatism in the liberal-leaning show business industry — men such as Charlton Heston, John Wayne, Jimmy Stewart and Ronald Reagan. And I'm grateful for others today who also have stood for conservative values — incredible actors such as Jim Caviezel, Mel Gibson, Jon Voight and others. These are the type of men who will go against the grain of the Hollywood status quo. These are the type of men who get the fact that entertainment isn't about playing party politics. These are the type of men who demonstrate what my hero and stalwart conservative, John Wayne, once said: "Courage is being scared to death and saddling up anyway."

Despite Tinseltown's liberal leanings, there is a lot of good that conservatives are doing in the film industry — not only for American entertainment but also for activism. That is why I recommend movies such as Sherwood Pictures' "Fireproof," David Zucker's "An American Carol" and the millennial social cry to expose and stop the global and even American slave trade, "Call + Response."

Underground or aboveground, we're all "created equal … endowed by (our) Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness." On Main Street or Wall Street, in the movie business or the political arena, maybe there's much more overlap in life than we think; maybe we've got a lot more in common than we really know. We're Americans.

(Note From Chuck: My wife, Gena, and I send our heartfelt condolences to the family and close friends of Paul Newman. Newman was absolutely one of Hollywood's finest, not only as an actor but also as a gentleman and humanitarian. Another legendary actor, who inspired us all, has ridden off into the sunset, but he never will be forgotten.)

To find out more about Chuck Norris and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CHUCK NORRIS

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.


Comments

3 Comments | Post Comment
Thanks, Chuck. I note your reference to Colonel James Stewart (dec'd), who flew 20 combat missions in WW2 with the 445th Bombardment Group as a B-24 Liberator pilot and later served as group operations officer with the 453rd BG. He set a fine example of an American who loved his country.
I've nearly finished Black Belt Patriotism - a most inspiring and practical read. Thanks again for this work.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Alan O'Reilly
Tue Sep 30, 2008 11:05 AM
Thank you Chuck, well said! I'm afraid that a lot of folks are caught up in the dialog and miss the point. For example, my sister and I, on the surface, are die hard liberal vs conservative, respectively. We frequently travel together, but to ease the rancor, I tried focusing on the issues instead of the individuals (ie Bush, Keith Obermaniac, etc) and we discovered that we actually agree on MOST of the issues. But once we started bringing the characters back into our debate, all was lost. I think you are right, we...all of us need to think in terms of what is right for our country instead of what benefits our latest political action hero.
Comment: #2
Posted by: bob
Tue Sep 30, 2008 8:05 PM
Sir;...Why so you persist in calling yourself a conservative? You are a reactionary. Do you want to know what a conservative acts like? One of my prime examples is the late great Margaret Mitchell, wife of John Mitchell, Nixon's AG. She was the one who said: there's J. E. Hoover,... when you've seen one FBI directer you've seen them all. And she would like to get tanked and drop a dime on all those crooks around Nixon because the Bill of Rights actually meant something to her, as it does to all conservatives. There is no revolutionary that is not a conservative holding on to the rights we have and trying to grab the rights we need. Thinking you can vote someone out of their rights on a majority of one means you miss the entire point of a society, which is a society only so long as we provide a mutual defense of rights. That is what families do. That is what tribes and nations do, is defend mutual rights. You want to turn people away from each other on the basis of some damned book of lies written by the Jews, of all people, to justify their crimes and documenting their failed society for all to see, and you think that makes you a conservative? You are an enemy of freedom. You are an enemy of morality which is the quality making all of mankind a family... Tough guy my ass. Tough guys don't have to take nothing from no body. You don't have to thieve some ones rights to be a tough guy. Every jerk who thinks he deserves special treatment wants to do that. You are the run of the mill. Factory made. Defend rights and you will be a man. Until that time you will just be an old baby in a beard. Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #3
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Thu Oct 2, 2008 4:37 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Chuck Norris
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Judge Napolitano
Judge Andrew P. NapolitanoUpdated 16 Feb 2012
Austin Bay
Austin BayUpdated 15 Feb 2012
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 15 Feb 2012

19 Apr 2011 Holy Week, Holy Shariah? (Part 1)

7 Apr 2009 Is Obama Afraid of the J-Word?

13 Apr 2010 More Tyranny Plus More Taxes Equals More Protests