creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris
14 Feb 2012
Why I Chose Newt Over Santorum

In 2008 — when my wife, Gena, and I were on the campaign trail backing former Arkansas Gov. Mike … Read More.

7 Feb 2012
Waging War on the Trifecta of Tyranny

As a six-time undefeated middleweight world karate champion, I have a pretty good idea what makes a warrior. … Read More.

31 Jan 2012
Proof Voters Are Smarter Than Media and Washington Elite

I think the mainstream media and Washington elite think the majority of voters just fell off the turnip truck.… Read More.

America's Founding Creationists

Share Comment

Flying under the legislative radar this past week was potential McCain vice presidential running mate and governor of Louisiana Bobby Jindal's signing into law of Senate Bill 733, which allows "local school systems to approve the use of supplemental instructional materials for teaching science classes." What opponents are up in arms about is that, with SB 733, teachers could supplement evolutionary teachings with materials on creationism or "intelligent design."

Having just celebrated America's independence a few days ago, neither Gov. Jindal nor any politician should hesitate to legislate pro-Creator educational platforms or fear anti-theistic swells that try to shut God out of America's classrooms. Our Founders didn't. And neither should we.

What many might not realize is that our Founders were familiar with naturalistic and evolutionary views of the sciences. Evolution has been around a lot longer than Darwin. And criticism for it also has been around a lot longer than Ben Stein's movie "Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed." The Founding Fathers were familiar with the arguments for and against theism and naturalism from well before the time of Christ. I'm not citing them here as an irrefutable argument for "intelligent design" in the classroom, but as a congruent historical voice with SB 733 that demonstrates science and theism are not mutually exclusive.

Though Thomas Paine was probably the most outspoken against religion among the Founders, he stood for creationism in schools: "It has been the error of schools to teach astronomy, and all the other sciences and subjects of natural philosophy, as accomplishments only; whereas they should be taught theologically, or with reference to the Being who is the Author of them: for all the principles of science are of divine origin. Man cannot make, or invent, or contrive principles; he can only discover them, and he ought to look through the discovery to the Author."

James Wilson — a signer of the Declaration of Independence, twice elected to the Continental Congress, and notable power behind the creation of the U.S. Constitution — asked, "When we view the inanimate and irrational creation around and above us, and contemplate the beautiful order observed in all its motions and appearances, is not the supposition unnatural and improbable that the rational and moral world should be abandoned to the frolics of chance or to the ravage of disorder?"

John Quincy Adams also wrote about his opposition to naturalism minus theism: "It is so obvious to every reasonable being, that (God) did not make himself; and the world which he inhabits could as little make itself that the moment we begin to exercise the power of reflection, it seems impossible to escape the conviction that there is a Creator.

… The first words of the Bible are, 'In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth."

John Adams describes those who pretend to understand the scope of the cosmos and deny the existence of God: "It has been long — very long — a settled opinion in my mind that there is now, never will be, and never was but one Being who can understand the universe, and that it is not only vain but wicked for insects (like us) to pretend to comprehend it."

Benjamin Franklin echoed his affirmation in a Creator: "For, if weak and foolish creatures as we are, but knowing the nature of a few things, can produce such wonderful effects … what power must He possess, Who not only knows the nature of everything in the universe but can make things of new natures with the greatest ease and at His pleasure! Agreeing, then, that the world was a first made by a Being of infinite wisdom, goodness, and power, which Being we call God."

According to Franklin, atheism was virtually nonexistent in America in those days. He explained in his 1787 pamphlet to Europeans, "Information to those who would remove (or move) to America": "To this may be truly added, that serious Religion under its various Denominations, is not only tolerated, but respected and practised. Atheism is unknown there, Infidelity rare & secret, so that Persons may live to a great Age in that Country without having their Piety shock'd by meeting with either an Atheist or an Infidel. And the Divine Being seems to have manifested his Approbation of the mutual Forbearance and Kindness with which the different Sects treat each other, by the remarkable Prosperity with which he has been pleased to favour the whole Country."

It is no coincidence that Thomas Jefferson penned the founding document, the Declaration of Independence, with an emphasis on God throughout: "The Laws of Nature and of Nature's God … all Men … are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights … appealing to the Supreme Judge of the World for the Rectitude of our Intentions. … And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm Reliance on the Protection of divine Providence."

The Declaration of Independence from Great Britain was truly a declaration of dependence upon God. That is another reason I believe that from political corridors to public classrooms, we need not fear nor resist our Creator's inductions.

To find out more about Chuck Norris and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CHUCK NORRIS

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.


Comments

4 Comments | Post Comment
Thanks Chuck
Some years back, Brian Dunlop, pastor of Lighthouse Baptist Church in San Dimas, California, prepared an 8-tape study on evolution entitled The Fool Hath Said In His Heart There Is No God, Psalm 14:1.
In the course of the study, he states, "Evolution is a device used by men who do not want to give account to a Holy God. And it is from the pit of hell." Quite apt, I think.
A book entitled The Evolution Handbook by Vance Ferrell is a recent publication condensing 3,000 pieces of scientific data refuting evolution. It is well worth studying. It is interesting that in this country, virtually no-one really uses anything Darwin wrote in their day-to-day work. But most engineers, scientists and technologists repeatedly use the work of Christian creationist scientist William Thomson, better known as Lord Kelvin, an Ulsterman. He devised the absolute temperature scale, which is indispensable to much engineering design work.
By contrast, evolutionists using evolution just don't cut it when it comes to doing anything of lasting value.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Alan O'Reilly
Thu Jul 10, 2008 6:43 AM
Chuck, I have enjoyed seeing you on the screen, and have appreciated your good-natured acceptance of the spoofs that have appeared. I've known all along that you were a decent fellow, sadly rare in Hollywood, but this is the first piece of your writing I've seen, and I am delighted. Your point, that evolution vs creation is in many ways a continuation of the centuries old, naturalism vs theism debate was excellent and germaine. The selected quotations illuminated that aspect of our Founders thinking quite well. Having said that, I nonetheless do not endorse your conclusion, as it relates to the science classroom. (Notwithstanding, the Louisianna law may be a good one. As our Lord said, "Wisdom is known by her children.") I have been a Believer for over 50 years, and am a degreed engineer with significant scientific training. As a hobby, I read in paleontology, geology, and the creation/evolution debate. I have misgivings about the intelligent-design initiative, and completely reject the Creationist, particularly the Young Earth Creationist, teachings. I think they are based on a faulty understanding of Genesis, on the one hand, and a failure to grasp the enterprise of science on the other. While I am by no means alone among Believers, C. S. Lewis and Francis Schaeffer only touched on the subject, and Hugh Ross goes directions I might not follow. I am distressed that the Church spends even 5 seconds on this topic, however, because I believe it diverts her from her calling, first of all, and because it is used to set up false hurdles at the gateway to Faith. There are many who insist that accepting the so-called literal interpretation of Genesis is a litmus test for discerning 'true' Christians, and who elevate it to a requirement for salvation for those seeking Christ. This is heresy.
Comment: #2
Posted by: davd w pennington
Sat Jul 12, 2008 11:27 AM
Sir; Just as apoint of information; I would not expect the republicans to get much in the way of black or hispanic votes putting an Asian Caucasian on the ticket with Mr. Mccain. He might look black to us, but my bet is that African Americans look at some one like that as just another parasite, like the Koreans, the Chinese, and the Arabs that buy into the ghetto and sell the necessities of life at a premium. No; we may not recognize the enemy, but they do. We don't understand the gievance Black people feel for having been robbed from their past and planted in this land to be the object of hatred and ridicule. Sure, they may not have the work ethic. You should remember that if they came out of slavery, and wages are slave wages they will not do the job no matter how much of Worthy Labor we butter it up with. So, tell your republican friends that Indian Americans are just like most of these imported hyphenated Americans, and within a generation they will own everything worth owning, and the only bright spot is that they will suffer every vice we now suffer. What do you think..., Sweeney
Comment: #3
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Sat Jul 12, 2008 10:17 PM
Equal Time. That supplimental instruction will have to cover Hindu, Bhuddist Intelligent Design as well. I'm all for theology being taught in schools, but not pretending to be science. I like post #3 referring to the literal translation of the Bible being the litmus test for a true christian. What if at some point science and religion somehow converge. The literal interpretation and the factual scientific theories unify. What if the literal translation is in deeed literal, yet not how it is interpreted now? What if the description of time in a biblical sense, is actually some quantum measurement. Using the current litteral view of the bible's creation story as science just does not hold water. I beleive it is possible to reconcile faith with scientific fact and have them, at least at the present time, at odds with eachother.
Comment: #4
Posted by: Nicholas Martin
Wed Nov 19, 2008 5:57 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Chuck Norris
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Lawrence Kudlow
Lawrence KudlowUpdated 16 Feb 2012
Judge Napolitano
Judge Andrew P. NapolitanoUpdated 16 Feb 2012
Joe Conason
Joe ConasonUpdated 16 Feb 2012

30 Aug 2011 A Singular Solution to Many Problems

4 Aug 2009 What Obama and My Wife Have in Common

9 Dec 2008 A Christmas Letter From the Front Lines in Iraq