creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Brent Bozell
L. Brent Bozell
12 Sep 2014
David Limbaugh's Case For Christianity

David Limbaugh has written a book that departs dramatically from his recent tomes on the worst excesses of … Read More.

10 Sep 2014
Journalists in Screech Advocacy Mode

It is amazing the degree to which the media can politicize — always from a leftist perspective — … Read More.

5 Sep 2014
When Child Sex Abuse Isn't News

Five years ago, Pope Benedict arrived in London to erupting controversy. Around 10,000 people took to the capital'… Read More.

The Ugly End of the Duke Lacrosse Story

Comment

On Nov. 22, with the national media focused on the 50th anniversary of former President John F. Kennedy's death, few noticed the story of a jury in North Carolina convicting Crystal Mangum of murder in the 2011 kitchen stabbing death of her boyfriend Reginald Daye. Why should that fact fixate the national media?

On its own, it shouldn't. But in 2006 and 2007, Mangum's false charges of rape against three Duke University lacrosse players caused a national tsunami of media sensation, an angry wave of prejudiced coverage presuming the guilt of rich white college boys when being accused by an African-American stripper.

More than any other media outlet, The New York Times trumpeted Mangum's rape accusations, even after they fell apart. As other liberal media were backing away, the Times published a notorious, error-riddled 5,700-word lead story on Aug. 25, 2006, by Duff Wilson, who argued there was enough evidence against the players for Michael Nifong, the atrocious local prosecutor (who would later be jailed and disbarred), to bring the case to trial.

Within the Times, perhaps the most aggressive accuser was then-sports columnist Selena Roberts, who made a habit of comparing the accused Duke lacrosse players to drug dealers and gang members.

Roberts continued to lob charges of white privilege in her last column on the subject in 2007: "Don't mess with Duke, though. To shine a light on its integrity has been treated by the irrational mighty as a threat to white privilege. Feel free to excoriate the African-American basketball stars and football behemoths for the misdeeds of all athletes, but lay off the lacrosse pipeline to Wall Street, excuse the khaki-pants crowd of SAT wonder kids." She lamented, "some news media jackknifed as they moved from victim's advocate to angel-tinting the lacrosse team."

To Roberts, the false accuser never stopped being the victim. Roberts never wrote a retraction for her columns that relentlessly championed a false narrative. She is the Al Sharpton of sports columnists.

The coverage ended. Well, there was one small trickle of news. In December 2010, The New York Times ran a tiny wire item in the sports section about the Duke lacrosse "victim" being found guilty of "misdemeanor child abuse and damaging property. A Durham County jury convicted Crystal Mangum, 32, of contributing to child abuse or neglect, injury to personal property and resisting a public officer after a February confrontation with her live-in boyfriend."

Then, in 2011, Mangum was indicted for murdering her boyfriend.

Again, it was a tiny item in the Times — a brief at the bottom of page B-14 of the sports section, under "Lacrosse": "Crystal Mangum, who falsely accused three Duke players of raping her in 2006, was charged with murder in the death of her boyfriend."

So when Mangum was convicted of murder on Nov. 22, now would it garner serious attention? The Times ran a tiny, 98-word wire story. There were no burning columns from the successors of Roberts.

Now remember that the entire time Mangum was ruining the reputations of three young men, the media kept her identity a secret. But now that her secret of lying and even murder is out, the secret remains, at least on the media's radar screen.

There were no Duke-accuser updates on ABC, CBS, NBC, NPR, PBS, USA Today or The Washington Post.

Like Roberts, ABC legal reporter Terry Moran didn't easily let go of the blame-the-rich-whites game in the spring of 2007, writing for his ABC blog: "Perhaps the outpouring of sympathy for (the falsely arrested Duke lacrosse players) is just a bit misplaced ... As students of Duke University or other elite institutions, these young men will get on with their privileged lives ... They are very differently situated in life from, say, the young women of the Rutgers University women's basketball team."

Those women were briefly, unfairly smeared one day in a bad Don Imus joke at 6 a.m., as "nappy-headed hos." Few would have heard it if liberals hadn't flagged it. Just as liberals flagged some falsely accused lacrosse players who were only guilty of being rich and white.

On Saturday, Nov. 23, CNN offered two segments on Mangum's conviction. Defense attorney Mark Geragos offered a strong post-trial verdict: "I thought at the time that that (Duke lacrosse) prosecution was not only ill-advised but that prosecutor and we were vindicated to some degree was — ended up being disbarred."

"Now you have a woman, and, you know, somebody had remarked to me this morning, karma is a bitch," he said. "You've got a situation where, you know, she had at least arguably a decent defense in this case, but has absolutely no credibility."

The national media also lost credibility in this Mangum mess. Their coverage at the start was outrageous, as was their suppression at the end.

L. Brent Bozell III is the president of the Media Research Center. To find out more about Brent Bozell III, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2013 CREATORS.COM



Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment
Sir;... No privilage has been so abused by those so privilaged as that of the press, which has been all about selling scandal to make money with ads; if, we except religion, and of course, property rights which are themselves scandals...
I believe in the freedom of speech, but where some have a megaphone everyone else must suffer a sore throat to be heard...
Is it too much to ask that we have a democracy with no privilages set aside, and above the law, for special people??? No one can show any great good coming of any of these privilages not equaled by some greater evil growing from the same source... These privilages come at the expense of our rights, out of our rights, -that the many must defend though only a few enjoy them... How about an end to privilage and an expansion of rights???
We need the truth, and we all owe each other the truth... If you have to rely upon your government, your employer, the press, or the churches for the truth; in other words, those who have a vested interest in lies, then you will never have truth... It is as simple as that... Truth; like the commonwealth is our common property, and those who rob the truth from us are enemies of the people... Spin it as you like it; but that will never make you my friend...
When you lie, you do not communicate, but mis-communicate, and in fact, you rob meaning from our words and the language all of us need to achieve our good...You people who use and wreck the language make communication, understanding, and reconciliation impossible... Do you wonder why people are more inclined after freedom of the press to do their talking with sticks and stones like so many cave men??? You do not have the right...You take it as a privilage...
Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #1
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Thu Nov 28, 2013 7:17 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
L. Brent Bozell and Tim Graham
Sep. `14
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 1 2 3 4
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Authorís Podcast
Newspaper ContributorsUpdated 15 Sep 2014
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 15 Sep 2014
Deb Saunders
Debra J. SaundersUpdated 14 Sep 2014

24 Oct 2007 Poor Planned Parenthood?

14 Apr 2010 Tea Parties vs. Hard-Left Protests

1 Apr 2009 Washington Polling Games