creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Brent Bozell
L. Brent Bozell
19 Mar 2010
TV Torture in Old Europe

For almost a decade, American news readers have been presented with a litany of complaints from Old Europe … Read More.

17 Mar 2010
A Fraud Fights Fox News

Howell Raines lost his executive editor's job at The New York Times for promoting the career of Jayson Blair, … Read More.

12 Mar 2010
NBC's Special Victims

NBC's "Law & Order" programs are long established and all over the schedule. But the sex-… Read More.

No Access For Hollywood?

Hollywood celebrities campaigning and cavorting with national contenders is a staple of presidential politics. Frank Sinatra is remembered for backing Jack Kennedy. Paul Newman made waves for Hubert Humphrey in 1968. Warren Beatty was part of George McGovern's "Malibu Mafia" in 1972. Ted Kennedy used Carroll O'Connor, famous for playing Archie Bunker, to add to his lunch-bucket appeal in 1980.

Republicans, too, had their moments. Nixon had Hope; the Gipper had the Duke, Jimmy Stewart and others. But these were exceptions to the rule. For a generation this industry comprised of the very rich and very famous has been dominated by the Left. Some know whereof they speak, many are intellectual embarrassments, and all believe the Earth's axis revolves around the 90210 zip code.

In 1992, they flexed their muscle in a spectacular fashion, seemingly everywhere in support of the Man from Hope. The exercise would be repeated every four years thereafter; in the last go-round John Kerry lined up every Affleck and DiCaprio he could find.

Something else was happening within this industry. It has become increasingly radicalized, angry and ugly. The Alec Baldwins were taking to the airwaves to spew venom on anything conservative, while Jessica Lange held a press conference in Spain to denounce America, and Whoopi Goldberg took to the stage in New York to grab her crotch and make jokes about President "Bush."

So what's happening in The Year of the One, with all of Barack Obama's charismatic appeal to the liberal stars? You'd expect a mass levitation, so smitten are they by this man and his message. Instead, there's, relatively, an eerie silence.

Yes, Tinseltown titans have been furiously active with fundraising, but much of that is very hush-hush, behind closed doors, like Barbra Streisand's $9-million soiree in September. Babs kept off camera and kept her verbosity under lock and key.

A few have publicly endorsed him. Many recall how a cavalcade of cool celebrities and singers were featured in a popular YouTube video, but that was in the primary season, when Obama was still battling with Hillary Clinton for the liberal base in Hollywood.

On the other hand, many celebrities have made rapid motions backward to avoid being too closely associated with Obama.

Take George Clooney, who publicly declared back in February that he told Obama he thought he was as inspirational as a Jack or Bobby Kennedy, but "I don't want to hurt him by saying that."

Then when it was rumored this summer that Clooney was offering Obama foreign-policy advice, Clooney furiously denied it in a statement: "I have never texted or emailed Sen. Obama. And I'll offer a million dollars to anyone who could prove otherwise. In fact, I've only talked to the senator once in the last year and a half … on the phone … I would hope that my friend John McCain would join me in condemning this kind of politics."

Translation wasn't necessary: Please don't ruin Obama by associating him with me.

The stars of rap music have been trying to keep their names and faces out of the Obama publicity as well. Vibe magazine lined up a list of hip-hoppers to express their opinions on Obama. Rapper Brad Jordan, who commercially goes by the name "Scarface," was blunt: "Hip hop needs to shut the f—- up right now to get Obama elected."

It appears Camp Obama has sent a message to Camp Hollywood. Keep it down, for now. The last thing he wants is for their radical agenda to be seen as his radical agenda.

Celebrities might also have been watching what happened to Oprah Winfrey, the billionaire Queen of Daytime, after she lent her whopping women's appeal on the campaign trail. She oozed over Obama as "The One," the untouchable leader of the new generation.

But her ratings declined, and her partisan activism eroded her approval ratings: Pollsters found her favorables fell from 74 to 55 percent. An AOL survey of 1.3 million Americans that found 46 percent said the daytime TV host who "made their day" was Ellen DeGeneres, while only 19 percent chose Oprah. Faced with all this, Winfrey retreated to a less activist role, foregoing her traditional role in the last several cycles of interviewing both party nominees on her show when the fall season kicked into gear.

The celebrity aversion to adding their glitzy names to the list of famous people associated with Barack Obama shows something obvious. Celebrities are out of touch with mainstream America, and they know it.

L. Brent Bozell III is the president of the Media Research Center. To find out more about Brent Bozell III, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.



Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment

Sir;... Aren't celebrities just about a wash??? I mean, they can often express an intelligent and well founded opinion; but if you can point to all the moral terpitude of the left coast and pin it on them, then they have done you more good than if they had shut up and sat down... But; When they are right, they are right even when they are left... Some times it happens that even people with money can see how wasteful and stupid republican leadership can be.. Some times people with slightly defective morality can recognize bold and proud immorality even when it is sanctified by every church in the land... Some times people half a bubble off can recognize out right insanity in their government and in the business of finance... No one has a lock on truth... Even when the truth is denied to people, even when vast sums of money are spent on all the Brent Bosells of the world to twist the truth into a prezzel; some times, even the most unlikely people can see it, and recognize it for what it is... And I know it is a game to you... The reason people have words for truth, and justice, and liberty, and those sorts of moral concepts is not so they will come when called; but because people cannot live without them... We find the truth essential, and when you water it down, or poison it as though it is your right; then you injure people, and you injure the nation... You should not consider it your right.. The right to speech, like all rights is yours only with a pure public purpose.. When you turn it to your own private profit, you are suddenly depending upon the ignorance or kindness of strangers...

Comment: #1
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Sat Nov 1, 2008 5:38 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:
Creators.com comments policy
More
L. Brent Bozell
Mar. `10
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
28 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Deb Saunders
Debra J. SaundersUpdated 21 Mar 2010
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 21 Mar 2010
Connie Schultz icon
Connie SchultzUpdated 21 Mar 2010

2 Jan 2008 What Does "Family Friendly" Mean?

26 Oct 2007 "Bella" and the Pro-Life Film Trend

18 Dec 2009 TV and the Soft Eshoo Bill