creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Brent Bozell
L. Brent Bozell
25 May 2012
Canada's 'Scientific' Museum of Smut

In Ottawa, the nation's capital of Canada, the Museum of Science and Technology has decided to provide school … Read More.

23 May 2012
Shameless Bias by Omission

You'd think the largest legal action in American history in defense of religious liberty would be a major … Read More.

18 May 2012
NBC Revives Howard Stern

Howard Stern has not been missed since he took his smutty shtick off the airwaves and onto the unregulated … Read More.

CBS: the Toilet Network

Share Comment

CBS announced its new fall lineup to advertisers and the entertainment press on May 18. After all the jawing and legal wrangling back and forth over televised profanity, and whether it's somehow not profane if it's blurted out accidentally, CBS has ended the debate over accidents. The artists formerly known as the classy "Tiffany Network" have very deliberately introduced a new show called "$—! My Dad Says."

That's right — the fecal curse word starting with an S in the title. They pronounce it "Bleep My Dad Says." They could simply have called it "Stuff My Dad Says" and not lost a scintilla of descriptive power. All they would lose is the childish wish to offend.

Michael Schneider of the trade publication Variety joked that it's too bad they didn't use an exclamation point and then a plus sign in the title after the dollar and pound signs, so the keyboard strokes would look more like the actual curse word. He actually gave CBS credit that they did not "wimp out" and sensibly clean up the show title. In the old black-and-white days, a sitcom like this would simply be named after its star, "The William Shatner Show." Nowadays, the title selection requires talent — of a 12-year-old.

This S-bomb show is a spinoff from a page on the social-media website Twitter with the same toilet-plugging name. Perhaps someone would argue that CBS is merely trying to stay true to the spirit of the actual Twitter page by Justin Halpern, where nearly every 140-character tweet of his dad's cranky "wisdom" is laced with profanities. Halpern already milked his cursing dad for a book deal before turning his excretory ambitions to television executives.

But Variety reported that CBS programming chief Nina Tassler was having fun with the new show title by quipping to reporters that CBS has ordered some "really funny (bleep)" after their sitcom "Big Bang Theory" on Thursdays. Tassler said the new show "proved that new media and traditional media are coming together in very cool ways." This Tassler has a very twisted idea of what "very cool" is. She also infamously declared that CBS's last attempt to be cool, the bed-hopping '70s polyester-orgy flop "Swingtown," was "fun and fresh" and "right in my sweet spot" of nostalgia.

It's quite clear that this title gives Hollywood and its media lapdogs a naughty thrill as they "mainstream" the most vulgar lingo.

Imagine the network salesmen telling advertisers "You really want to bet on (Bleep)." CBS's perfect sponsor would be Frank's Red Hot Sauce, whose ad agency has the same "standards" as CBS. Their radio ad's "grabber" is a sweet-voiced grandmother type who says of the hot sauce, "I put that (bleep) on everything." What an appetizing combo plate these merchants would make.

Critics outside the Hollywood bubble scorned CBS for its gaudy attempt to take profanity to a new level, to which CBS responds that the show will "in no way be indecent and will adhere to all CBS standards." What is clear is that there is no such thing as "CBS standards." There is only that which CBS can and can't get away with.

The network also lamely noted the show can be blocked using the V-chip. But the V-chip can be organized to block out L-codes for crude language, but it blocks the actual episode (if it's coded), not titles. If there were a "D" for dishonesty, CBS would be banned.

The whole S-word debut was unveiled on the same day that CBS submitted a legal brief in a federal appeals court declaring once again that it cannot be fined for the Janet Jackson breast exposure. In a defense that would make Bill Clinton proud, CBS argued it did not have a "guilty mind" in airing the wardrobe malfunction.

Doesn't the one hand of CBS really betray the other hand, as much as they try to play ignorant?

CBS lawyers get paid the big bucks to be perpetually clueless, since some people have long enough memories to recall that Viacom president Mel Karmazin took responsibility and owned the guilt before Congress in 2005. He admitted that halftime-show organizers planned out a ripped-shirt finale, and "we take responsibility for it." Karmazin and CBS clearly didn't believe a word of it.

Our broadcast television networks are not being shy about their agenda. They clearly intend to drag the American people into the enlightenment of the "21st century," where all that is putrid is permissible.

L. Brent Bozell III is the president of the Media Research Center. To find out more about Brent Bozell III, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM


Comments

4 Comments | Post Comment
Considering the very real and very urgent issues we are facing with the global economies and global environmental issues - why is this important? Could we please concentrate on the real issues?
Comment: #1
Posted by: Bill
Sun May 30, 2010 11:12 PM
My family has a simple solution to this problem. Our TV is used to watch DVDs only. (We used to get PBS, but a storm blew down the antenna a few years ago. It was about six months until anyone noticed. That's how little we watch.) We allow the kids (3 and 11) to watch selected items as downloads from netflixs. The most destructive item of kid TV is removed; my kids see zero commercials. (OK, the 11 year old gets some exposure to commercial TV at friends houses.) The oldest started to watch old "Witches of Waverly Place" episodes, but that one was soon nixed. Religious issues? No. Aptitude issues. After noticing that the smart-mouth-teen verbal style was slipping into our house, we cut it off at the source and used it as a educational moment to discuss how the characters treated each other with little respect.
My mother once told me about an old time preacher of her childhood who, when given the argument that there are educational aspects to TV, asked if you would take a biscuit out of the hog slop, wipe off the slop, and give it to your kids. At the time, I was about 18, I thought "what a closed mind". I have since seen the wisdom and I consider myself liberal.
The general coarsening of society is the bigger issue that Mr. Bozel misses in focusing on this latest bit electronic sewage. It has infected radio, print, and TV as well as politics. There is no sense of integrity and intellectual honesty in debates on issues. (This seems to be a problem on both sides of the Red/Blue divide, but it seems to be a bigger problem on the right. Might just be my liberal bias speaking on that one, however.) I am very clear that addressing the problem of the coarsening and dumbing down of our society is important to dealing effectively with Bill's "real issues".
Comment: #2
Posted by: Mark
Mon May 31, 2010 3:48 PM
Make that "attitude issues". Thank you spell check.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Mark
Mon May 31, 2010 3:50 PM
Your reaction was very good Mark, but then - your last comment says more about your own attitude than mine. Like so many Americans on some sort of moral crusade, a crusade they plays out mostly in their own heads, you just cannot help taking a final jab at the truth. Have a nice day Mark! Thanks for your feedback.
Comment: #4
Posted by: Bill
Mon May 31, 2010 11:28 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
L. Brent Bozell
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

27 Jul 2007 Where Are the Admirable Athletes?

15 Dec 2010 Barbara Walters vs. Sarah Palin

21 Apr 2010 Bill Clinton, Still Smearing Conservatives