opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Brent Bozell
L. Brent Bozell
10 Feb 2016
The Media's Softness for Sanders and Socialism

At the start of the Democratic presidential race, the media viewed the contest as a cakewalk. The … Read More.

5 Feb 2016
White Rapper Confesses 'White Privilege'

Macklemore is the stage name of a white rapper from Seattle named Ben Haggerty. He and his publicists are … Read More.

3 Feb 2016
Iowa Ruins the 'Inevitable'

The results in the Iowa caucuses are a rebuke to the notion that the national media have all the influence … Read More.

Al Gore, Super-Rich Sellout


The liberal media have spent 12 years feeling sorry for Al Gore. The Man Who Should Have Won in 2000 has had megatons of positive publicity dumped on him, hailing him as the "Goracle." They cheered as leftists honored him with the Nobel Peace Prize and gave an Oscar to his filmed eco-sermon, "An Inconvenient Truth."

So when Gore sold his left-wing cable channel Current TV to Al-Jazeera for $500 million, where were they? Despite the fact that conservatives thought the deal sounded like a ridiculous April Fools' joke, the networks had nearly nothing to say. ABC skipped it entirely. CBS and NBC offered a perfunctory sentence on a couple of newscasts.

These networks might argue this was not an Earth-shattering business event given the puny size of Current's audience, which is true. At about 42,000 viewers during primetime, the nationwide audience could fit inside the Washington Redskins' Fedex Field and still leave the stadium half-empty. It's about one-fiftieth of the audience TLC gets with "Honey Boo Boo." Of about 96 cable channels that are publicly rated by Nielsen, 93 of them have higher ratings than Current. It is a Nothing Network.

But the controversy is not about ratings. It's about one network selling itself to another best known for vicious anti-American propaganda. Al-Jazeera is not buying Current for the potential profits. Surely, they'll shut the old channel down. They want the cable slots to push their poison in American homes.

In 2006, CNN's Frank Sesno interviewed Al-Jazeera talk show host Riz Khan and asked if the terrorist group Hamas should be designated as a terrorist organization. "I'm not one to judge," Khan replied. What about Hezbollah? Khan answered: "Same thing, you know, I'm not going to judge."

There are other signs of disturbing pro-Islamist bias. In the midst of the "Arab Spring" celebrations in Cairo's Tahrir Square on Feb. 11, 2011, some 200 men sexually assaulted CBS correspondent Lara Logan. Al-Jazeera English, which was credited by Hillary Clinton and other liberals for its ubiquitous coverage of the uprising, deliberately ignored the assault on Logan. When they were called out by Washington Post columnist Jonathan Capehart, Al-Jazeera English publicist responded that the network "believes as a general rule" that journalists "are not the story." Capehart then noted that just days before, Al-Jazeera touted a story on how "Domestic and foreign journalists have come under siege amid the turmoil in Egypt."

Then there's the case of honoring Lebanese terrorist Samir Kuntar.

In 1979, Kuntar was imprisoned for shooting an Israeli civilian in front of the Israeli's 4-year-old daughter, and then bashing in the little girl's head with his rifle. In 2008, Al-Jazeera in Qatar threw a televised birthday party for Kuntar, then newly released in a prisoner exchange. An Al-Jazeera interviewer told Kuntar, "You deserve even more than this," then brought out cake and sparklers. The cake had pictures on it, and Kuntar declared the "most beautiful picture" on the cake was of Hassan Nasrallah, the leader of Hezbollah. "There cannot be anything more beautiful," he proclaimed.

Al Gore could see nothing but positive qualities in his buyer, putting out a shameless statement that claimed, "Al-Jazeera, like Current, believes that facts and truth lead to a better understanding of the world around us."

Gore rebuffed an offer from conservative radio/TV personality Glenn Beck to buy Current TV. Beck was told, "The legacy of who the network goes to is important to us, and we are sensitive to networks not aligned with our point of view."

Beck is not aligned with the Gore viewpoint, and yet Al-Jazeera is? Al Gore, too, would celebrate a child-murdering terrorist with a birthday cake? Why isn't this alignment controversial or newsworthy?

Then the story gets worse. While Beck told his listeners he was rejected within minutes, Gore became a lobbyist for Al-Jazeera. New York Times media reporter Brian Stelter revealed that to preserve the deal and his big payout, Gore went to some of cable distributors looking for an excuse to drop the low-rated channel, "and reminded them that their contracts with Current TV called it a news channel. Were the distributors going to say that an American version of Al Jazeera didn't qualify, possibly invoking ugly stereotypes of the Middle Eastern news giant?"

So dropping Al-Jazeera became anti-"news," anti-Arab and Islamophobic.

But the networks won't breathe a word about Beck, and never allowed a conservative or a critic of radical Islam to offer any criticism of either Al Gore the super-rich sellout, or his terror-enabling buyer. None dares express horror that the man who was almost president on 9/11 was allying himself with al-Qaida's video jukebox.

L. Brent Bozell III is the president of the Media Research Center. To find out more about Brent Bozell III, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at



1 Comments | Post Comment
Sir;... Talk about Vicious, Anti-American Propaganda and you are talking only about FOX news...
If you want to cry about some serious immoral nonsense; then talk about the government turning over our airwaves which is a part of our commonwealth for next to nothing, to people having no love of us or of democracy, who profit on our need for the truth, or distraction, neither of which we can live without... These owners of networks bend the truth like a prezell and only allow us so much as we cannot live without, or as much as will make their lies seem plausible... They walk like whores down either side of the political street depending upon who is paying more...
Is the government going broke??? Try these owners for their crimes against the facts, and if found guilty, then take their bread and butter stations.... In the meantime, tax them all into a defense of their rights since they are no defense of our rights...
The way this country has been sold cheap to the rich is an outrage, and the fact that in the hands of the rich it serves only their interest, and does not even support the commonwealth with taxes is a greater outrage still...As much as those rich people assail public broadcasting, making no secret of their desire to have revenge on those turbulent priests of truth and education, at least PBS can show a pure public purpose, as not one of the others can...
You can tell people all you want to pay no attention to the man behind the curtain, and it may work for your own dim bulbs; but there will be hell to pay when America discovers how much of the truth they have been denied and for how long...Follow the money, because some are reaping fortunes for mangling the truth beyond recognition; and the people and their government are getting none of it...You look at the money for nothing -in all that air, and you tell me some of that does not belong to this people... It all belongs to us...
The truth is the common property of humanity and those who shet all over the truth for a quick buck when truth is as essential to our survival as food and water and air should be dropped from the rolls of humanity...There is not a mad dog in this world more deserving of mercy than these rich creeps...They have turned a privilage we have allowed them against us... America;..What is your verdict???
Comment: #1
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Wed Jan 9, 2013 8:50 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right: comments policy
L. Brent Bozell and Tim Graham
Feb. `16
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 1 2 3 4 5
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Authorís Podcast
Veronique de RugyUpdated 11 Feb 2016
Judge Napolitano
Judge Andrew P. NapolitanoUpdated 11 Feb 2016
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 10 Feb 2016

7 Mar 2014 Jane Fonda, Sex Guru for Teenagers?

18 Mar 2011 Japan: Just Not Funny

2 Jan 2013 David Gregory's Props and Pomposity