creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Bill O'Reilly
Bill O'Reilly
14 Feb 2012
Why Whitney Died

The media have no bleepin' clue how to cover the death of Whitney Houston. That's because she was slowly … Read More.

11 Feb 2012
A Gay Time at JCPenney

Every Halloween, New York City residents are greeted by homosexual parade marchers dressed to impress … Read More.

4 Feb 2012
Political Correctness and Muslims

The story is grisly: a husband and wife murdering their three young daughters, ages 19, 17 and 13, by … Read More.

The End of Times?

Share Comment

The nation's largest left-wing newspaper and the bible for network news producers and bookers may be going under. This week, The New York Times announced more staggering losses: nearly $75 million dollars in the first quarter alone. The New York Post is reporting that the Times Company owes more than $1 billion and has just $34 million in the bank. A few months ago, the company borrowed $250 million from Mexican billionaire Carlos Slim at a reported 14 percent interest rate. With things going south fast, pardon the pun, Slim might want to put in a call to Times publisher Arthur Sulzberger Jr.

The spin from Sulzberger is that the Internet is strangling the newspaper industry, and there is some truth to that. Why read an ideologically crazed paper when you can acquire a variety of information on your computer? But other papers are not suffering nearly as much as the Times, so there must be more to it.

There is no question that the Times has journalistic talent. This week the paper won five Pulitzers. It's true that the Pulitzer people favor left-wing operations (the past eight Pulitzer Prizes for commentary have gone to liberal writers), but New York Times journalists often do good reporting.

The problem is that under Sulzberger and executive editor Bill Keller, the Times has gone crazy left, attacking those with whom the paper disagrees and demonstrating a hatred for conservatives (particularly President Bush) that is almost pathological. The Times features liberal columnists in every section of the paper, and they hit low, often using personal invective to smear perceived opponents.

That unfair and unbalanced approach has alienated a large number of readers and advertisers.

According to a recent Fox News/Opinion Dynamics Poll, 46 percent of Americans define themselves as conservative. Just 34 percent say they are liberal. In this very intense marketplace, insulting half the country on a daily basis may not be a great business plan.

The Times company also has a major problem with The Boston Globe, which Sulzberger bought back in 1993. That paper is on the verge of bankruptcy and recently told its employees that it will cut their pay and health benefits. Since the Times and the Globe are big on "universal" health care, that caused some giggling in anti-Times precincts.

Over the past few months, newspapers in Chicago, Seattle, Minneapolis and Denver have either folded or filed for bankruptcy. With the exception of The Rocky Mountain News, all the papers were committed left-wing enterprises. The truth is that most Americans are traditional-minded folks. They believe their country is noble; they want respectful discourse. Fanaticism of any kind is not the American way.

The New York Times is most definitely a committed left-wing concern that is openly contemptuous of the conservative, traditional point of view. That is the primary reason the paper may soon dissolve. And all the cash in Carlos Slim's fat wallet is not going to change that.

Veteran TV news anchor Bill O'Reilly is host of the Fox News show "The O'Reilly Factor" and author of the book "Who's Looking Out For You?" To find out more about Bill O'Reilly, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com. This column originates on the Web site www.billoreilly.com.

COPYRIGHT 2009 BillOReilly.com.


Comments

5 Comments | Post Comment
Yeah, like Bill O' doesn't engage in radical, inflammatory invective.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Genghis Khan
Sun Apr 26, 2009 5:29 PM
Never bought the NYT - never will. But when they say they are printing the last slimy issue, I will just so I can burn the gutter rag.
Comment: #2
Posted by:
Mon Apr 27, 2009 11:08 AM
My wife is from an Eastern University. She buys the NY TIMES Sunday edition. I can't beleive anyone would not want to read a paper that filters the facts, always condemns moderate changes and actions, while promoting liberal and socialist views? If the TIMES goes under Bill, what would be our next best choice for an anti-american, arrogant, and left biased source of propaganda?
Comment: #3
Posted by: Bruce Corbett
Mon Apr 27, 2009 1:20 PM
You would think that an article in which the central point is that the NYT is losing readership due to the paper's "far-left" slant would provide at least ONE example of this "far-left" slant.
Comment: #4
Posted by: David C
Mon Apr 27, 2009 1:27 PM
Does anyone feels any better ( as 'in grandeour' we should be as promised by Obama ) ...does anyone feels we are better than three months ago ?,....OR... OUR COUNTRY IS IN A WORST SHAPE ?

This' percentage aproval' - the classic average at 100 days, 60-63% - this is just a reminicence of what is left from his PERSONAL INJECTED IMAGE AMERICAN-ROCK-N-ROLL-IDOL TYPE thing .

This,however, IS NOT said to attempt to undermine his HISTORICAL MARK as he certainly accomplish so well,..not at all,… but we have to be clear that all we have form him is ‘MARQEE-LIGHT EFFECT', very well structurated selling to the public - nice and eloquent theater, smiles, poses and gestures , etc,…'.the works',sort of speak,… - and THAT! ,to THAT !, the populache is very very vulnerable to it.

The OBAMA GANG POLITICAL MACHINERY knew that very well and so,…they invented / created OBAMA THE FRONT-MAN' ,,,,THE SYMBOL, THE AVATAR. But , however, to all that , SUBSTANCE ? is lack in the mosaic.

Americans are awake and are 'snaping-out' from the letargic pseudo-hypnotic obamanized phase, once so powerful. Americans ARE NOT UNDER DECEPTION NO LONGER..
The hour of truth is here now…100 days and nothing but UNACOMPLISHLMENTS,… A WEAKER NATIONAL SECURITY,….. ONGOING WEAKER ECONO9MY SPECTRUM AND DETERIORATION OF THE SOCIO-DYNAMICS WHERE FREE SPEECH AND INDIVIDUALITY IS AT RISK TO BE ELIMINATED,…ANCHOR VALUES AND PRINCIPLES DETERIORATING AS WELL .And so, ANARCHY seems to be the norm for ruling,
Quite pathetic but all is for to be just reversed - ‘WE', THE PEOPLE WILL REMOVE AND REPALACE THE CORRUPTED DESTRUCTIVE CURRENT ADMINISTRATION.

OBAMA'S POLITICAL POPULARITY IS FADING
The reason is obvious. is the ‘HISTORICAL FACTOR' ….evidently and very correctly Pres Obama is one for the books of history, that NEVER CAN BE DENIED. The dynamics brake with the ‘traditionalism' that characterize the small or virtually no oportunity to minority groups to adquire higer plateau in the scio-multispectrum.

So, with that said is honorable in extreme for this to happen ;….however - BIG HOWEVER - that DOES NOT set basis THE ACEPTANCE TO the poor performance on which this administration, - where he is jus but ‘THE FRONT-MAN' , a front-face , a messenger, a symbol - on which this CORRUPTED ADMINISTRATION IS TAKING OUR COUNTRY TO.
The destrucion of our nation is quite clear ahead if we tolerate this further more,…BUT AMERICA IS AWAKE NOW AND WE ARE GOING TO REVERSE THIS ASSAULT.

Obama is not going to accomplish ABSOLUTELLY NOTHNING WITH IRAN. or ANY OTHER NATION FOR THAT MATTER; Eventually - AND SOON ! Israel will have to pre-emtp attack to IRAN atomic facilities, and OBAMA AND HIS GANG WILL DO NOTHING TO HELP BUT WILL REPUDIATE ISRAEL ACTIONS - JUST WATCH !
However here in american soil Obama will have another successful shot at the masses for he still have some pulll because his personal popularity - just that.

And so all comes clear;
WHY IT SEEMS THAT OBAMA AND HIS GANG ARE GETING AWAY WITH EVERYTHING THEY WANT?
Because Obama is a ‘history-mark', that leads the populache to let go EVERYTHING AND ANYTHING on his behalf.Although his symbolism is important, that is not reason much less excuse, to allow HIM AND HIS GANG TO DESTROY OUR COUNTRY.
The public is not blind, but is fooling themselves (SOME OF THEM) pathetically and so our nation is at RISK!

The historical event, of to have a minority-generated president, is already ‘in the books' but, the PRODUCT OF THAT EVENT - (Obama,…more specific, OBAMA AND HIS GANG OF INEPTS) are with an agenda of NATIONAL DESTRUCTION. The ANTI-CONSTITUTIONALISM IS CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER TO OUR COUNTRY - AND SO, THIS FIRST ‘HISTORICAL ATTEMPT' IS JUST NOT WORKING AT ALL ON BEHALF OF OUR COUNTRY….WE ARE LOOSING THE NATION TO THIS ‘HISTORICAL PRODUCT'
On that the public is WAKE! already,… AND IS NOW, WELL AWARE OF THE DYNAMICS.

WE,THE PEOPLE, we have the responsablity of to REMOVE AND REPLACE THE PRESENT CORRUPTED ADMINSTRATION with better leaders,… individuals of GOOD CHARACTER, HONESTY, AND INTEGRITY.

OBAMA AND HIS GANG BROUGHT TO US, DECEPTION !

And as for the next 100 days,....expect, MORE OF THE SAME.....THE 'CHANGE FOR THE GOOD AS HE PROMISED' STILL WILL NOT BE. Sad story.

This is the moment when many who voted for Obama on the past FRAUDULENT ELECTIONS wishes to find a TIME MACHINE to go back in time, and undo the mistake.
Ah!, yes, too science fiction...well, in response,....in the future (should one is to come) forget about emotions, nice pseudo-hypnotic speeches,tv tabloids (CNN, NBC, MSNBC, tabloids publications such as, THE NEW YORK TIMES , THE HUFFINGTON POST, LA TIMES etc ,...you know,, things that clouds reasoning,...but most important - GET KNOWLEDGE, INVESTIGATE, ANALYZE, LISTEN TO THE CANDIDATES THEMSELVES.

Sincerely,
Daniel Cabrera
Merrillville,Indiana
Comment: #5
Posted by: dan9el
Mon Apr 27, 2009 2:29 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Bill O'Reilly
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Judge Napolitano
Judge Andrew P. NapolitanoUpdated 16 Feb 2012
Austin Bay
Austin BayUpdated 15 Feb 2012
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 15 Feb 2012

23 Oct 2010 View to a Kill

28 Mar 2009 The Loyal Opposition

5 Sep 2009 Panic at the White House