creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Bill O'Reilly
Bill O'Reilly
14 Feb 2012
Why Whitney Died

The media have no bleepin' clue how to cover the death of Whitney Houston. That's because she was slowly … Read More.

11 Feb 2012
A Gay Time at JCPenney

Every Halloween, New York City residents are greeted by homosexual parade marchers dressed to impress … Read More.

4 Feb 2012
Political Correctness and Muslims

The story is grisly: a husband and wife murdering their three young daughters, ages 19, 17 and 13, by … Read More.

Hate Speech and the Net

Share Comment

What do Nancy Reagan and Michelle Obama have in common besides being political wives? Well, they were both under heavy scrutiny this week.

As you may know, Michelle Obama gave two speeches in Wisconsin where she said that she was proud of America for the first time in her adult life because her husband's campaign has been so well-received. That statement, of course, caused major controversy. Michelle Obama is 45 years old. Are you telling me she's never been proud of her country before?

Nancy Reagan is 86 years old. A few days ago, she fell down in her California home and was rushed to the hospital. She's OK, but it was a painful ordeal for Mrs. Reagan.

It was also painful to see how political Internet sites analyzed both of these situations. On the far left, they basically ignored the Michelle Obama controversy. Only one prominent far-left site dealt with it, and it blamed conservatives for trumping up hostility against Mrs. Obama.

As for Nancy Reagan, that was a far different story. On the crazy-left Huffington Post, the following hateful comments were posted about the former first lady:

— "Like her evil husband, she has lived far too long. Here's hoping the hag suffers for several weeks, then croaks in the tub."

— "The old bat will probably steal everything in the hospital room."

— "I feel no pity for the b—— who took delight in watching thousands die of a horrible disease and watching the poor having to eat out of dumpsters because of her husband's political beliefs."

There are dozens of other vile comments available for your reading pleasure on The Huffington Post.

Apparently, Arianna Huffington, the woman who runs the site, has no problem with publishing hate speech. Ms. Huffington has the power to remove this trash immediately, but she chooses not to.

Incredibly, some Americans still do not understand how powerful the Internet has become in a very short time. Many of us are also unaware of how hate speech is flourishing on the Net. The haters can post their threats and defamation anonymously, and can attack at will with no consequence. Instead of wearing white hoods, these despicable people hide behind a machine.

Defenders of the political Internet sewer say freedom of speech is the issue. But that's a canard. Hate speech is hate speech, whether it's being spewed by some nut wearing a Nazi armband or by some gnome hunched over a keyboard.

People like Arianna Huffington should be taken out to the village square and publicly scolded. Their enterprises diminish this country and nothing good can come of that.

A few years ago, people who spewed hatred in public were ostracized. Now they can join clubs on the Net. There is something very disturbing about all of this. In order for a country to be truly free, people must be responsible and fair-minded. Right now, I believe the Internet is taking us in the opposite direction. And there are few voices speaking up against it.

Veteran TV news anchor Bill O'Reilly is host of the Fox News show "The O'Reilly Factor" and author of the book "Who's Looking Out For You?" To find out more about Bill O'Reilly, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com. This column originates on the Web site www.billoreilly.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 BillOReilly.com.


Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment
Bill O'Reilly writes: "Defenders of the political Internet sewer say freedom of speech is the issue. But that's a canard. Hate speech is hate speech . . ." He misses the point. Tolerating hate speech is part of the price we pay for free speech. He also says, "A few years ago, people who spewed hatred in public were ostracized." As compared to today? I think that, if anything, the opposite is true. We've become hypersensitive to any offhand remark that might possibly be construed as "hateful" or "offensive" -- witness the recent flaps involving Isaiah Washington, Michael Richards, Don Imus, et al. If Mr. O'Reilly were to write a piece criticizing Barack Obama for having as much substance as cotton candy, he'd probably be accused of racism for mentioning cotton in connection with a black man!
Comment: #1
Posted by: Scot Penslar
Fri Feb 22, 2008 11:12 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Bill O'Reilly
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Judge Napolitano
Judge Andrew P. NapolitanoUpdated 16 Feb 2012
Austin Bay
Austin BayUpdated 15 Feb 2012
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 15 Feb 2012

14 Jun 2008 Oil and Trouble

6 Jan 2007 A Free Press? In Your Dreams

26 Sep 2009 The Wide World of Chaos