creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Bill O'Reilly
Bill O'Reilly
14 Feb 2012
Why Whitney Died

The media have no bleepin' clue how to cover the death of Whitney Houston. That's because she was slowly … Read More.

11 Feb 2012
A Gay Time at JCPenney

Every Halloween, New York City residents are greeted by homosexual parade marchers dressed to impress … Read More.

4 Feb 2012
Political Correctness and Muslims

The story is grisly: a husband and wife murdering their three young daughters, ages 19, 17 and 13, by … Read More.

Don't Be Deceived

Share Comment

It seems every day there is another example of media deception in America. With the Fourth of July approaching, it is well worth remembering why the Founding Fathers gave the press special privileges. They wanted journalists to report honestly, to give the folks accurate, unbiased information so they could make informed decisions about who should hold power. Many of the Founders, like Thomas Jefferson and John Adams, didn't much like the press, but they understood that, for a democratic Republic to work, voters need honest information.

Unfortunately, the vision of a free and honest press is fast disappearing in America. Let me give you yet another vivid example. This week a poll by The New York Times asked: "Would you be willing to pay higher taxes so that all Americans have health insurance?"

Fifty-seven percent said they were willing, 37 percent were not willing, and 6 percent had no opinion.

So, according to the Times, Americans overwhelmingly want government financed health care. That's what the poll says, right?

But if you read all the way down to the bottom of the poll, you see another question. "Who did you vote for (in the presidential election)?"

Forty-eight percent said Barack Obama, and just 25 percent answered John McCain. The rest, 19 percent, did not vote. Wow, that's almost two to one for Obama.

But the popular vote tally in the election last November was 53 percent for Obama and 46 percent for McCain. Wait a minute. That's a lot closer than two to one. Apparently The New York Times skewed the polling by offering the questions to mostly Obama voters.

I'm shocked they supported higher taxes for federal health care, aren't you?

This kind of dishonesty is not uncommon in the media. The Times says its poll is "scientific." Sure it is. Scientifically stacking the deck.

I believe very few people read the entire poll before digesting the health care headline. The result is a flawed perception of what the American public really wants. The folks may indeed support Uncle Sam paying some heavy medical bills, but this poll is not a reflection of anything other than a New York Times deception.

By the way, CBS News also had its name on that poll.

As a media guy who wants accurate information, that kind of stuff tees me off. As soon as the pollsters learned that most of the respondents were Obama people, they should have thrown the results out. But the Times ardently favors national health care and a huge federal government. So the con played out.

The most frustrating part about this is that nothing can be done. The Times has an ombudsman, but he's a joke, and no outside agency has any power over the paper. It can pretty much do what it wants, and does.

It is true that the Times and some other media outlets, most committed left, are on the brink of bankruptcy. The liberal papers say the Internet is to blame, and that's partly true.

But the folks are beginning to understand that the informational fix is in. What good is "all the news that's fit to print" if the news is bogus?

The Times might want to poll that question.

Veteran TV news anchor Bill O'Reilly is host of the Fox News show "The O'Reilly Factor" and author of the book "Who's Looking Out For You?" To find out more about Bill O'Reilly, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com. This column originates on the Web site www.billoreilly.com.

COPYRIGHT 2009 BillOReilly.com.


Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment
Who are you trying to kid? One only need to consult the New York Times story to see who is really being deceptive. As it so happens, the Times laid out it's methodology, see it at http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/21/health/policy/21mbox.html?_r=1&ref=policy. The first couple paragraphs makes O'Reilly's claims unlikely:

"The latest New York Times/CBS News Poll is based on telephone interviews conducted from June 12 to June 16 with 895 adults throughout the United States.

The sample of land-line telephone exchanges called was randomly selected by a computer from a complete list of more than 69,000 active residential exchanges across the country. The exchanges were chosen so as to ensure that each region of the country was represented in proportion to its population."

How, considering the randomization of the process could the Times skew "the polling by offering the questions to mostly Obama voters?" Perhaps O'Reilly could explain that to us? Or explain why he avoided the fact that the poll still showed a higher percentage of those willing to accept a tax increase than the percentage of Obama voters in spite of his contention the poll was skewed?
Comment: #1
Posted by: Timothy Griffy
Sat Jun 27, 2009 3:11 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Bill O'Reilly
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Judge Napolitano
Judge Andrew P. NapolitanoUpdated 16 Feb 2012
Austin Bay
Austin BayUpdated 15 Feb 2012
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 15 Feb 2012

6 Jan 2007 A Free Press? In Your Dreams

18 Sep 2010 Are You Ready for Some Football?

9 Oct 2010 Is Hate Speech Protected?