opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Bill O'Reilly
Bill O'Reilly
28 Dec 2013
Teenage Werewolves

Back in the 1950s, "Little Joe Cartwright" starred in a movie called "I Was a Teenage Werewolf.… Read More.

21 Dec 2013
The Christmas Spirit

Anyone offended by public displays of Christmas needs to see a psychiatrist. Are we clear on this? You are a … Read More.

14 Dec 2013
Merry Christmas, 1913

One hundred years ago in America, Christmas was a mighty different situation. Based on newspaper reports, MyHeritage.… Read More.

Crushing Ambition


The left-wing media went wild after the election when analysis showed that many poorer Americans supported President Obama and entitlements could have been a major reason why. Liberals always like to think of themselves as noble, and the thought that some vote-buying could have occurred is deeply offensive to them. Nevertheless, the facts speak for themselves.

Americans earning less than $30,000 a year gave the president about 7 million more votes than Gov. Romney. All told, Obama defeated Romney by 3.5 million votes. The math is clear.

But what about motivation? How can you assign entitlements as a voting factor? Well, what else is there?

Were lower-income Americans voting to support the $16 trillion dollar debt? The 8 percent unemployment rate? The nearly $5,000-a-year decline in wages for working people?

No, many lower-income voters were supporting the expansion of means-tested entitlements like food stamps, Medicaid and welfare payments, along with Obamacare, where about 30 million Americans will have their health insurance paid for by other Americans.

When you have individuals in more than 100 million American households receiving some kind of federal subsidy outside of Medicare and Social Security, that will mean something at the ballot box.

Especially because Mitt Romney proposed to change all that.

But why is doling out so-called "means-tested entitlements" a bad thing? Isn't it a sign of a humane society?

Financial safety nets are surely worthy. We can't let the elderly and children suffer because they don't have resources. But what's happening in America is far more than simply expanding a needed safety net.

Twenty years ago, the feds spent 9 percent of the total budget on entitlements other than Medicare and Social Security. Now, the number is 16 percent. Liberals scream that it's because of the bad economy. Not true.

Twenty years ago, unemployment among African-Americans was 14.3 percent. This year, it is 14.3 percent. In the Hispanic-American precincts, unemployment in 1992 was 11 percent; today, it's 10 percent.

It is the liberal culture that is driving the entitlement mentality, and that is destructive to the country. The truth is that folks who get stuff are not likely to be as motivated as people who work for things. Freebies sap initiative.

We are living in a "Where's mine?" age. "If at first you don't succeed, then ask for things to be given to you." A record amount of Americans are receiving food stamps, and more workers are on federal disability than ever before. The Democrat Party actively supports the entitlement expansion, and that absolutely helped Barack Obama get re-elected earlier this month.

If we continue down this road, however, say hello to Emperor Nero. Same thing happened in Ancient Rome. Look it up. The population became weak and unmotivated, and Roman power collapsed as individual ambition was crushed by selfishness and dependence on the state.

The question used to be, "Who's your daddy?" Now, it's, "Who's your nanny?"

And we all know the answer.

Veteran TV news anchor Bill O'Reilly is host of the Fox News show "The O'Reilly Factor" and author of the book "Pinheads and Patriots: Where You Stand in the Age of Obama." To find out more about Bill O'Reilly, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at This column originates on the website




4 Comments | Post Comment
Ah yes, too much welfare and too many entitlements, the reason for the fall of the Roman empire. How did we all miss that one? I did "look it up" as O'Reilly insisted, and somehow I can't seem to find any reference to government handouts as the reason for the fall of the empire.

I would venture to guess there might have been an excess of spoiled rich kids in Rome just like here who inherited their wealth and had not a clue how to put that wealth to work. Reminds me of the Republican dependence on the super wealthy, most of whom similarly employed no greater skill than being born into the right family to get their hands on all that money.

Regarding the fall of the Roman Empire, after following O'Reilly's advice and looking it up, all I can find are constant reminders that the empire pretty much weakened and fell apart at about the same pace that Christianity expanded and took over. Maybe O'Reilly should focus on that troublesome fact and take the challenge to see how he can explain it away with his silly right wing sermonizing.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Masako
Sat Nov 24, 2012 12:19 PM
Is the growing entitlement state a problem? Yes. Is it the biggest problem? No. Republicans only support spending cuts when it suits them. They still want tons of money for foreign aid, nation building, a bigger military, the drug war, corperate welfare, and a bunch of others. Lets address these things first before taking money from the poor. It not only makes the republicans look like hypocrites, but jerks as well.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Chris McCoy
Mon Nov 26, 2012 6:31 AM
Re: Chris McCoy. You should consider running for president. Aside from the misspelling of "corporate," your comment is absolutely pristine. Keep saying it like this.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Masako
Tue Nov 27, 2012 6:21 PM
Thanks Masako. I get so tired of guys like Bill who advocate small government at home and big government overseas in the same sentence and actually expect to be taken seriously.
Comment: #4
Posted by: Chris McCoy
Thu Nov 29, 2012 9:21 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right: comments policy
Bill O'Reilly
Dec. `13
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Linda Chavez
Linda ChavezUpdated 12 Feb 2016
Suzanne Fields
Suzanne FieldsUpdated 12 Feb 2016
David Limbaugh
David LimbaughUpdated 12 Feb 2016

26 Mar 2011 The Triumph of Evil

28 Jul 2012 Where Were You in '62?

4 Aug 2012 Playing Chicken with Gay Marriage