creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Bill O'Reilly
Bill O'Reilly
14 Feb 2012
Why Whitney Died

The media have no bleepin' clue how to cover the death of Whitney Houston. That's because she was slowly … Read More.

11 Feb 2012
A Gay Time at JCPenney

Every Halloween, New York City residents are greeted by homosexual parade marchers dressed to impress … Read More.

4 Feb 2012
Political Correctness and Muslims

The story is grisly: a husband and wife murdering their three young daughters, ages 19, 17 and 13, by … Read More.

Chatting with Sarah

Share Comment

The phenomenon known as Sarah Palin made her debut this week as an analyst on Fox News. You should have heard the braying from our competitors CNN and MSNBC. She's a dunce, they wailed, a conservative shill! Foaming at the mouth doesn't begin to describe the reaction.

Here's my question: If you guys are so smart, how come your ratings are softer than Jell-O?

Palin appeared on my program and began by knocking President Obama around a bit on health care and terrorism, standard-issue right-wing stuff. But then I asked her about charges on "60 Minutes" that her frame of reference is so weak, she doesn't even understand why there are two Koreas. Palin just shook her head and said the man who made the charge, author John Heilemann, is a liberal who simply is not telling the truth.

So there.

Whatever your opinion of her, you have to admit the bashing of Palin is almost unprecedented in the media. Newspaper critics and uber-liberal TV commentators are the worst. Reviewing my interview with the former governor in The New York Times, Kate Zernike wrote: "After marveling that '60 Minutes' spent eight minutes on Ms. Palin on Sunday night, Mr. O'Reilly spent about 20 with her."

Well, yeah. She's a brand-new FNC analyst and was the lead guest on my program. The “60 Minutes” story was about a book featuring dozens of politicians. Palin, however, got most of the airtime, and it was all negative.

And that's the point. If you hammer Palin, the Times will have no beef.

But give her a forum in which she can respond to her detractors, and watch out.

David Zurawik, television critic for The Baltimore Sun, makes that point better than I ever could. Reviewing the Palin chat, Zurawik said: "In a protected TV environment like the one Fox and O'Reilly skillfully provided for her Tuesday night, I think (Palin) could be a red-hot ratings winner. And the country and our political conversation are going to be the poorer for it.

"I can only imagine what kind of power these two might come to wield in the elections of 2010."

Aha!

Never mind that I asked Palin about the perception that her intellect is not up to presidential standards, Zurawik and his soul brothers and sisters on the left are very worried about the fact that Palin now has a place to state her case. A very well-watched place.

That presents a clear and present danger to the liberal ideologues masquerading as press people. No longer can they mock Palin with impunity. Now she can mock them back, big time, and perhaps convince open-minded folks that her message is worthy, and that she is not a reincarnation of Georgette on “The Mary Tyler Moore Show.”

Simply put, Palin has a big opportunity to balance the playing field. Boy, do her critics hate that.

Veteran TV news anchor Bill O'Reilly is host of the Fox News show "The O'Reilly Factor" and author of the book "Who's Looking Out For You?" To find out more about Bill O'Reilly, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com. This column originates on the Web site www.billoreilly.com.

COPYRIGHT 2010 BillOReilly.com.

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM


Comments

4 Comments | Post Comment
You two have common cause. It's all about the money that can be wrung out of the media, isn't it?
Comment: #1
Posted by: Masako
Fri Jan 15, 2010 9:07 PM
Oh, excuse me. Just in case it wasn't clear, it's all about the money.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Masako
Fri Jan 15, 2010 9:11 PM
...And what parts of your body and soul you are willing to auction off to get it.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Masako
Fri Jan 15, 2010 9:16 PM
There's a misleading statement in O'Reilly's column that could easily be taken as deliberate.

Twice on the actual Fox News interview, O'Reilly asked Palin "Did you not know there are two Koreas?" Both times Palin answered that this was not true.

In O'Reilly's column, he leaves out what he actually asked Palin. He says "But then I asked hr about charges on "60 Minutes" that her frame of reference is so weak, she doesn't even understand why there are two Koreas. Plin just shook her head and said the man who made the charge, author John Heilemann, is a liberal guy who simply is not telling the truth."

What O'Reilly says in those sentences is true; he did ask her about the charge made by Heilemann and she did shake her head. But he leaves out the fact that he asked her a completely different question: "Did you not know there are two Koreas?" He asked that question TWICE and fails to report it.

Does he lose credibility? I would say so.
Comment: #4
Posted by: Michael Walker
Sat Jan 16, 2010 9:49 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Bill O'Reilly
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 27 Feb 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 20 Feb 2012
Mark Levy
Mark LevyUpdated 18 Feb 2012

24 Jan 2009 The Collapse of the Left-Wing Media

10 Nov 2007 Courting Rosie

13 Aug 2011 Calling an Audible