Opinion> Bill Oreilly

	11 May 2013 Freedom Under Fire Every time there's a horrendous story about kidnapping or child molestation, America loses another ounce of freedom.… Read More.
	4 May 2013 The War on Terror: Up Close and Personal Living in the shadows of the ongoing war on terror are 1,715 American military people who lost limbs in Iraq … Read More.
	27 Apr 2013 Droning On Shortly after the terror bombings in Boston last week, two different media people made statements that were … Read More.

What Happened, Mr. President?

It hasn't been a great week for the Obama folks, as the scandal du jour tour has firmly taken hold. Every day it seems another federal agency is exposed as having intimidated, snooped, covered up or gone to Vegas on the taxpayer dime. Zimbabwe is even making fun of us.

On Jan. 21, 2009, in remarks welcoming his new presidential staff, Barack Obama said: "Let me say it as simply as I can: Transparency and the rule of law will be the touchstones of this presidency."

So what happened, Mr. President? Why so much stonewalling?

Let's take this one by one. Obama has to know that nobody is buying the assertion that U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice made a simple error when she blamed the assassination of Ambassador Christopher Stevens on a spontaneous Muslim uprising caused by a stupid anti-Islamic video. No one believes that was an honest mistake, Mr. President.

So it is on Obama himself to explain the Rice deal — and also to explain why armed U.S. assets in Tripoli were not immediately sent to help the ambassador and other Americans under siege in Benghazi.

But for eight months, the president has refused to explain.

The IRS chaos is newer, and the president was forced to respond by firing Steve Miller, who ran the agency. But again, how could the powerful IRS get so out of control? Was it loyalty to a liberal president that made agents unfairly target conservatives? We need some clarity here.

On the Associated Press front, all the president has to do is what Attorney General Eric Holder refuses to do: explain in general terms why the Justice Department thought it necessary to secure the phone records of AP reporters; explain why there was an urgency to the investigation.

Obama can certainly do that without compromising national security. So why isn't he doing it?

The answer to that question lies in accountability. When has Obama ever been held accountable for anything? The press largely covers for him when mistakes are made, and the public seems to be in a very forgiving mood, especially on economic matters, where, according to some polls, almost half of the voters believe the sluggish economy is George W. Bush's fault.

Sensing blood in the water, the president's ardent opponents will continue to take the scandals as far as they can. The only way this stops is for Obama to take control, admit whatever mistakes were made, explain how and why they happened, and hope the public understands.

If he doesn't do that, his second term could well be a national nightmare.

Veteran TV news anchor Bill O'Reilly is host of the Fox News show "The O'Reilly Factor" and author of the book "Pinheads and Patriots: Where You Stand in the Age of Obama." To find out more about Bill O'Reilly, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com. This column originates on the website www.billoreilly.com.

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM

Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment

Bill dosen't seem really upset about the AP scandal. He should be. If anything, thats the most nefarious of the scandals. But Bills position is to sacrifice freedom for security, so of course he would have no problem bullying and muzzeling the press despite the fact that he is the press. Or at least pretends to be. Bill has just repeated what every other conservative journalist has, that Obama won't take accountability for anything. On that point he is right. Then you have axelfool saying that the government is simply too vast to be responsible for everything. If he's right, then thats a pretty clear sign that we need to shink government to a point we can hold it accountable for its actions. An unaccountable government is a tyranical one. And despite Obamas speech, tyranny is right around the corner.

Comment: #1
Posted by: Chris McCoy
Mon May 20, 2013 4:56 AM