creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Ben Shapiro
Ben Shapiro
23 May 2012
First, They Came for Cory Booker

Cory Booker is, by most accounts, a reasonable man. He went to Stanford and Oxford, as well as Yale Law … Read More.

16 May 2012
President Diva

According to President Obama, he's a historic figure. That's no figure of speech. This week, journalist Seth … Read More.

9 May 2012
Obama Evolves, Politics Devolves

This week, Vice President Joe Biden and Secretary of Education Arne Duncan essentially endorsed same-sex marriage.… Read More.

Where Have Our Cojones Gone?

Share Comment

Last week in Boston, a seven-year-old boy named Mark got into a fight with a bully. The bully put his hands around the boy's throat and began to squeeze. That's when Mark fought back; he kicked his aggressor right in the family jewels. In a normal society, we'd celebrate Mark. Throw him a ticker tape parade or something. Bullies need a sharp kick to the testicles. That's how you convince them that bullying is wrong.

But in Boston, Mark was charged with sexual assault.

Just to get this straight: Massachusetts Democrat Barney Frank's gay lover can run a homosexual prostitution ring from his apartment and Frank will not be prosecuted. But a boy kicks a bully in the berries and he faces expulsion from school.

It's not the bully who lost his chestnuts. It's our country.

At some point in the recent past, America moved from the Gilded Age to the Gelded Age. It's no longer considered polite to beat up bullies — that's simply not "tolerant." All this chatter from the left about the problem of bullying — Lady Gaga is visiting the White House this week to tell her subordinate, President Obama, what to do about it — is so much nonsense. The left has no idea how to solve the bullying problem. They treat all violence as equal — Mark and the bully are on the same moral plane — and so they recommend counseling and training, as though a little classroom instruction can solve boys' basic biological urge toward aggression.

Have these people ever met little boys?

Apparently not. Lady Gaga has only met her "little monsters," androgynous pantywaists with no distinguishing sexual characteristics. She thinks that homosexual boys are "born this way," but bullies can be changed by a few sensitivity training sessions. The sad truth is that biology can only be overcome by real conditioning, not by nattering. And in the case of bullies, conditioning equals physical violence.

But in our country today, that solution is considered as bad as the problem. The left has instead come up with an alternative solution: eunichism. If male biology drives violence, we have to wash that man right out of the young boys' hair. We will train them not to use toy guns but to play with dolls. We will teach them that heterosexuality and homosexuality are equals, since all sexes are the same.

We will teach them that fighting bullies is the same as being a bully. No wonder the left isn't all that upset about female genital mutilation in Muslim countries, they're busily removing the testes of our young boys right here at home.

There's only one problem with this beautiful new world of asexualism: It's idiotic. All we do is train good boys to be pansies; bullies, meanwhile, continue to be bullies. Jerry Sandusky wasn't going to stop raping little boys based on taking a few seminars — but Mike McQueary was going to avoid reporting that rape to police if he was trained into spinelessness by the surrounding culture. The Muslim Brotherhood isn't going to stop its aggressive pursuit of worldwide Shariah if we offer its members free Lady Gaga tickets and a shopping spree at Sephora. But Western civilization will let them do it if we spend enough time decrying our own aggressive instinct.

The fact is that males' aggressive instinct is good for the world, if channeled properly. Without it, Hitler goes unpunished. Without it, millions continue to starve in the Soviet Union. The key to the aggressive instinct is training it to act along proper moral lines, not eradicating it.

The American people know that down deep. A few months back, a video went viral of a young Sydney boy, Casey Heynes, being bullied by a younger attacker, Richard. Richard punches the much larger Heynes in the face. Then he punches him again. Finally, Heynes can stand it no longer: He picks up Richard and body-slams him to the ground. Richard gets up and wobbles around, off camera. End video.

Elites of the world decried Heynes' behavior. "We don't believe that violence is ever the answer," said John Dalgleish, head of research at Kids Helpline and Boys Town. But tribute sites went up on the Internet to Heynes; videos celebrating his heroics became common fodder. As everyone who has ever faced down a bully knows, the only way to stop a bully is to show him that physical force won't get him anywhere. The only way to show him that is to beat the hell out of him.

We live in a world of bullies. So long as we continue to psychologically castrate our own boys, the bullies of the world will continue winning. We will continue asking why they hate us, and they will continue choking the life out of us. Only if we re-learn to kick them in the cojones rather than removing our own will we emerge victorious.

Ben Shapiro, 27, is a graduate of UCLA and Harvard Law School. He is the four-time bestselling author of "Primetime Propaganda." To find out more about Ben Shapiro and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2011 CREATORS.COM


Comments

8 Comments | Post Comment
The word "cojones" is quite vulgar in Spanish. Is it appropriate to use it in a title of a serious opinion column? Would Mr. Shapiro use the word "balls" in the same context?
Comment: #1
Posted by: Ariana
Tue Dec 6, 2011 3:51 PM
"...the only way to stop a bully is to show him that physical force won't get him anywhere. The only way to show him that is to beat the hell out of him."

That's all very well, but what if he's stronger than you are? What if you he punches you, you punch him back and he beats you unconscious?

Back in the 'good old days', when it was acceptable for a guy to punch a bully in the face and be considered manly for it, women were also targets of male aggression, and mostly unable to defend themselves due to being smaller than their attackers. That's why there are now laws against domestic violence and stronger laws against sexual assault, and conservatives complain about how the liberal feminists have ruined everything.

The problem with your argument, Mr. Shapiro, is that when you reduce the conflict to a "he-hits-you-you-hit-him-back" level, it's the bigger individual who has the advantage, not the one who is in the right. Casey Heynes had the advantage of being bigger than his bully, Richard. What if the opposite had been true?

It's certainly acceptable to fight back to defend oneself. Mark should never have been penalized; he was being choked, and had no choice but to fight back. But it's naive to suppose that attacking one's attacker is the always going to solve the problem. There are plenty of instances when that is ill-advised or even impossible.
Comment: #2
Posted by: JMG
Tue Dec 6, 2011 5:50 PM
The high-school student son of a friend was being picked on by a group of bullies--and they were all hauled into the prinicpal's office--and the victim was given the same reprimands as the perps. The school's policy is to treat all parties to an altercation the same--even when there is good evidence of who started what. So the guys who want to get someone in trouble just picks on them, knowing that they will get off light and their victim will also get busted. My friend's son--who is a good-sized kid and fairly tough himself--was seriously threatened by the bullies and changed schools for his own safety. Something is wrong with the way these things are handled.
Comment: #3
Posted by: partsmom
Tue Dec 6, 2011 6:20 PM
I had a retarded student who fought back against a bully. The bully yelled "yo teach, you see what he did!" I replied "yes, I saw the whole thing, and if you want to pick on Shawn, you do so at your own risk!"
Comment: #4
Posted by: Roger
Wed Dec 7, 2011 3:21 AM
.. The emasculation - along with the Humanist agenda - of America is nothing new. It is a slow, deliberate progression of little steps that ultimately lead to monstrous changes if viewed on a scale of decades rather than days. It has been well done and now here we are ...

Roe Vs Wade .. bra burning .. ERA .. "breaking the glass ceiling" .. no smoking in the boardroom .. "uncomfortable" equals harrassment .. tolerance - with its bevvy of problems running from bowing at the waist to terrorists, reverse discrimination, gay equals a legal minority, etc, etc, ad nauseaum .. and now this.

Watch ... the pendulum has swung its limit.. The pendulum is now beginning its trip back to conservatism. It's just a shame that we can't get it to stop in the middle.
Comment: #5
Posted by: Billy
Wed Dec 7, 2011 11:20 AM
What in the hell does this have to do with Barney Frank or gay people? You gotta wonder when some of these young guys keep blabbing on and on about the gays, just what their fascination is.
Comment: #6
Posted by: Ms. Rowena
Thu Dec 8, 2011 5:09 AM
Ms. Rowena, I gotta agree. Mind you, I agree with Mr. Shapiro that a swift kick is sometimes the only language a bully understands; I was bullied, almost daily, as a child until I fought back. But what on earth does that have to do with being gay? Especially since gay kids are so much more likely to be bullied, and I've known a few who fought back quite decisively.

I'm sure you've seen the study that showed that homophobic attitudes were correlated with arousal from viewing gay porn. Didn't surprise me one bit.
Comment: #7
Posted by: Carla
Thu Dec 8, 2011 9:03 AM
I say Hip Hip Hooray for Ben Shapiro. I, for one, am bored with the overused term "homophobe". Folks should get over the labels and name calling. I'm also disgusted with the term 'hate crime'. Every crime is hateful. Isn't the term 'hate crime' just another example of class warfare? All criminals should be appropriately fined or punished, regardless of who the victim is. Also criminals should never be let out of jail early,simply based upon good behavior when locked behind bars. Instead, time should be added to their sentence for any bad behavior.
Comment: #8
Posted by: Yvonne Prelutsky
Thu Dec 8, 2011 1:52 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Ben Shapiro
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

28 Dec 2011 America's Big Loser 2011: Americans

13 Feb 2008 Conservatives: Sitting Out 2008 is the Height of Idiocy

22 Dec 2010 Defense Secretary Lady Gaga and the Real Obama Administration