creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Ben Shapiro
Ben Shapiro
23 May 2012
First, They Came for Cory Booker

Cory Booker is, by most accounts, a reasonable man. He went to Stanford and Oxford, as well as Yale Law … Read More.

16 May 2012
President Diva

According to President Obama, he's a historic figure. That's no figure of speech. This week, journalist Seth … Read More.

9 May 2012
Obama Evolves, Politics Devolves

This week, Vice President Joe Biden and Secretary of Education Arne Duncan essentially endorsed same-sex marriage.… Read More.

The End of the U.S. Economy

Share Comment

What happens when more of us work for the government — or receive paychecks from the government without work — than those of us who work in the private sector?

We're soon going to find out. This week, CNBC reported that social welfare payments now comprise 35 percent of wages and salaries this year. In other words, more than a third of all people receiving "paychecks" are receiving government redistribution checks via welfare, Social Security, Medicare or unemployment. In 1960, just 10 percent of the population garnered a wage from government anti-work programs. Now more than one in three of us do.

And then there are those who receive paychecks by working for the government. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, approximately 8 percent of the work force is government employed. There is certainly some crossover between the two groups, but between them, we can assume with certainty that the government supports more than 40 percent of Americans. Is it any wonder that so few Americans want to cut social welfare benefits?

It's getting worse. The 60 percent of American workers who do not live off the taxpayer dime shrinks as public unions suck up more and more money — why work for a small business when you can work for the biggest business in the country, the government, and receive a wonderful pension and excellent benefits? Taking taxpayer cash means that you don't have to produce anything worthwhile, don't have to create a profit for your boss and don't have to meet any performance standards. All you have to do is breathe. And avoid government cutbacks.

The easiest way to avoid government cutbacks is to vote democrat. The dirty little secret of the liberal political program is that it isn't a program at all — it's simple bribery. Vote for us, you get a check. Vote for them, you lose your check. It's quite simple and quite effective.

The question is: what happens when the money runs out?

And the money is running out. America's welfare state and government employment/pension spending now comprise at least 62 percent of the annual budget (6 percent more is merely interest payments on the national debt).

These numbers are slated to increase as our population ages and more people retire. Ten thousand people per day are hitting retirement age. Medicare and Medicaid expenditures have nearly doubled over the past decade. With the rise of Obamacare, the national debt will near $30 trillion by 2020. By way of contrast, the entire world gross domestic product per year is approximately $74 trillion. Unless world domination is in our near-term plans, we're in serious trouble.

Contrary to the left's insistence that economic conservatives are the true colonialists, it has always been leftist movements that rely on imperialism to advance their agendas. Lenin's "Imperialism" argued that subjugation was the "final stage" of the free market. And eventually looking to cultivate new markets to pursue, financiers would force governments to plant their flag abroad. In reality, the left's need for more servants to feed the government monster drives imperialism. The British Empire heavily regulated transnational trade during its heyday, granting monopolies and taxing its colonies. Germany's Nazi regime and the USSR were both socialist; both were rapacious looters on the world stage. Expansionism is not a solely leftist phenomenon, of course — but for the most part, full-scale colonization is.

Socialism leads to economic decay. The physics of a decaying economy is like the physics of a dying star: it can explode outward or collapse inward. Since there are no more worlds to conquer, the economy can only collapse inward, as it has in Greece, Ireland and Spain. Who, then, will support the angry masses that march for their "pay" checks?

No one. The coming economic storm will be cataclysmic in its effects. Governments may topple. The population may suffer. This is the legacy of a left, which has purposefully grabbed a tiger by its tail and promised it slabs of raw taxpayer meat. Eventually, the meat will run out, and the tiger will still be hungry.

Ben Shapiro, 27, is a graduate of UCLA and Harvard Law School. He is the three-time bestselling author of "Brainwashed: How Universities Indoctrinate America's Youth," and host of "The Ben Shapiro Show" on 810 AM in Orlando, FL. To find out more about Ben Shapiro and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2011 CREATORS.COM.


Comments

9 Comments | Post Comment
Well said!
Comment: #1
Posted by: Doug Morelly
Thu Mar 10, 2011 12:11 PM
People have to learn personal responsibility again and we have to return to God and the gold standard or we are dommed as a country.
Comment: #2
Posted by: John
Mon Mar 21, 2011 4:32 PM
We must remember that events of great significance, such as a bad economy, are sustainable only with great and active participation by we the many and we must recognize our personal failures to react to changes that offer possibility of creating unfair benefit, such as outsourcing which leads to trade imbalance and escalating costs of mounting political campaigns which has led to to unfairness, are the worst type of participation.
I recognize an atmosphere of stability, harmony and trust to be just around the corner with access denied by a great door whose keys are in the hands of a few selfish political campaign contributors. Our Court ruled we must abide by such but common sense reveals that our many citizens hold more knowledge and more power than the few in our Courts, the few in government and the few corruptors, hence hold ability to wrest those keys and reopen that door to an environment superior to that enveloping us today.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Don Steele
Tue Mar 22, 2011 10:37 AM
top99shopping.com
Classic Handbags,UGG Boots,Whosale shoes
Wholesale sale of professional ,Classic Handbags,UGG Boots,Wholesale shoes
and so on.Cooperation brand : nike,puma,affliction,prada,Polo,AF,gucci,chanel,lacoste,Louis Vuitton,ED hardy,coogi,dior,armani.when you receivr the order,if you do not like our products, returned at any time.
Comment: #4
Posted by: ailsalinlin
Tue Mar 22, 2011 10:53 PM
“In 1960, just 10 percent of the population garnered a wage from government anti-work programs. Now more than one in three of us do.”
In 1960, there were more jobs (of a larger variety) for a larger group of people.
In 1960, AFAIK, there was minimal (if any) outsourcing – (IMO a major cause of the joblessness / economic crisis)
In 1960, technology (i.e. computers) were not replacing peoples' jobs - more efficient but IMO the results outweigh the increased efficiency.
(I have nothing against computers – just an observation)
“Is it any wonder that so few Americans want to cut social welfare benefits?”
Maybe but has anyone done polls of the unemployed? If so are they happy? If not, perhaps there should be some assessments of those out of work (lay-offs, their jobs are no longer in existence, being under (or over) qualified) etc…
Of course there are a significant of freeloaders (including the bail-out recipients of Wall street) but IMO much of the increased percentage of people being supported by the government are in that situation through no fault of their own… (And are NOT happy).
“why work for a small business when you can work for the biggest business in the country, the government, and receive a wonderful pension and excellent benefits?”
Many small businesses (and large businesses) hire people for just short of the number of hours to qualify for benefits (and this is NOT because the small business owners are stingy, they simply cannot afford it). There should be <more> financial incentives to increase the businesses' ability to offer benefits. (IMO))
“The easiest way to avoid government cutbacks is to vote democrat. The dirty little secret of the liberal political program is that it isn't a program at all — it's simple bribery. Vote for us, you get a check. Vote for them, you lose your check. It's quite simple and quite effective.”
Agree BUT it is BOTH sides
IMO, “lawmakers” are perhaps the most corrupt group of any people (both parties). Earmarks, etc. It is bribery – IMO 100%.
I feel that both sides (Left and Right) are to blame for the current (and impending) economic disaster; The mess we are in is monstrous. It started with a conservative president and liberal congress, But in no way can I give the Bush admin all the credit! The Obama administration has shown nothing less than supreme incompetence in “fixing the economy”.
The bail-outs (Enormous amounts of money to Wall street) without a corresponding amount of dollars to the main street victims was IMO a form of “government redistribution” (a handout) on a massive scale.
There should have been a compulsory course (that would have had to be passed by CEOs and CFOs) on the value of the dollar
i.e. when the economy is in a perilous state, one does not go on retreats that cost in the 10's of 1000's of dollars or more (and are more than likely tax deductible); one does not spend > $1000.00 on an ashtray or a waste basket; one does not give bonuses to CEOs who have run companies into the ground (hence are pan-handling); one does not reward behavior that fits the definition of fraud (mortgage issues) etc.
The same amount of money should have been given to the (former) middle class now low class so they could get a leg-up (after having lost their homes, jobs (dignity)); to the private sector so they could hire people; &#61664; all of this would eventually end up in Wall street.
(Like the food chain)
Just my personal opinion
Comment: #5
Posted by: xTAwATx
Thu Mar 24, 2011 2:01 PM
top99shopping.com
Classic Handbags,UGG Boots,Whosale shoes
Wholesale sale of professional ,Classic Handbags,UGG Boots,Wholesale shoes
and so on.Cooperation brand : nike,puma,affliction,prada,Polo,AF,gucci,chanel,lacoste,Louis Vuitton,ED hardy,coogi,dior,armani.when you receivr the order,if you do not like our products, returned at any time.
Comment: #6
Posted by: ailsalinlin
Sat Mar 26, 2011 1:20 AM
top99shopping.com
Classic Handbags,UGG Boots,Whosale shoes
Wholesale sale of professional ,Classic Handbags,UGG Boots,Wholesale shoes
and so on.Cooperation brand : nike,puma,affliction,prada,Polo,AF,gucci,chanel,lacoste,Louis Vuitton,ED hardy,coogi,dior,armani.when you receivr the order,if you do not like our products, returned at any time.
Comment: #7
Posted by: ailsalinlin
Sat Mar 26, 2011 1:26 AM
top99shopping.com
Classic Handbags,UGG Boots,Whosale shoes
Wholesale sale of professional ,Classic Handbags,UGG Boots,Wholesale shoes
and so on.Cooperation brand : nike,puma,affliction,prada,Polo,AF,gucci,chanel,lacoste,Louis Vuitton,ED hardy,coogi,dior,armani.when you receivr the order,if you do not like our products, returned at any time.
Comment: #8
Posted by: ailsalinlin
Mon Mar 28, 2011 2:27 AM
top99shopping.com
Classic Handbags,UGG Boots,Whosale shoes
Wholesale sale of professional ,Classic Handbags,UGG Boots,Wholesale shoes
and so on.Cooperation brand : nike,puma,affliction,prada,Polo,AF,gucci,chanel,lacoste,Louis Vuitton,ED hardy,coogi,dior,armani.when you receivr the order,if you do not like our products, returned at any time.
Comment: #9
Posted by: ailsalinlin
Mon Mar 28, 2011 2:30 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Ben Shapiro
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

26 Sep 2007 Columbia's Arrogant, Ignorant Decision

28 May 2008 Barack Obama's Anti-Military Problem

22 Jul 2009 Anguish Across the Globe as Obama Rolls Back American Influence