creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Austin Bay
Austin Bay
15 Feb 2012
Greek Fire, Euro-Roulette

Anarchists tossing firebombs celebrated the Greek government's latest round of economic austerity measures. … Read More.

8 Feb 2012
Syria: World War I Continues

In a Feb. 1 Wall Street Journal essay, the always eloquent and astute Fouad Ajami characterized Syria's … Read More.

1 Feb 2012
China's Sudan Dilemmas

Sudan and South Sudan's slow yet deadly war of blood for oil reserves has ensnared Africa's slyest empire builder:… Read More.

Tsar Wars Versus Star Wars

Share Comment

As the Russo-Georgian War's August gunfire slips into a murky September ceasefire, the Pentagon reports that the Russians "are still not living up to the terms of the ceasefire agreement."

So, what does Russia want?

The question intentionally echoes, "So what did Stalin want?" — which historian John Lewis Gaddis asked then answered in his award-winning book "The Cold War: A New History." Gaddis argued Joseph Stalin wanted "security for himself, his regime, his country and his ideology, in precisely that order."

These goals would also resonate in an "Old History" of Russia — call it Tsar Wars, with Ivan the Terrible as the featured personality.

Personalizing Russia 2008 as Vladimir Putin strikes me as a stretch. Putin runs an oligarchy, not a totalitarian dictatorship, but Putin is clearly at the nucleus of the oligarchy, with ex-KGB pals, friendly billionaires and useful mafiya in close orbits. But dub the pals and billionaires "new royalty," and Putin might be an emerging "pop Tsar" — a savvy 21st century autocrat leveraging Russian nationalist demands. Orchestrating a domestically popular military ventures fits this frame.

Gaddis titled the first chapter of his new history "The Return of Fear." Ivan the Terrible and Stalin subscribed to Machiavelli's advice in "The Prince": It "is much safer to be feared than loved." The Russo-Georgia War does not revive the Cold War. However, reviving fear is most certainly a Russian aim.

NATO and the European Union didn't quail when Russia insisted that Kosovo's unilateral independence was a "redline issue" for the Kremlin. Georgia President Mikheil Saakashvili certainly didn't fear Russian power when troubles began in early August — violent troubles in South Ossetia that may have been a Russian trap.

The Kremlin says toppling Saakashvili is a goal. For now, Saakashvili remains in power, and he has secured a global reputation for pugnacity.

Russian troops, however, remain in Georgian ports — thus pugnacity remains in peril.

Over time, fear can erode. In August 1968, 40 years ago, Russian tanks rolled into Czechoslovakia to crush Alexander Dubcek's "Prague Spring" democratic movement. The Soviet empire chained Eastern Europeans for another 21 years — a generation. A generation of frightened Georgians may serve Russia's interests.

Fear, however, can stiffen opposition. Ukraine, for example, has harshly criticized Russia's invasion and publicly supported Georgia. Poland's decision to deploy American ground-based interceptor (GBI) anti-ballistic missiles has been in the works for years. The GBIs are designed to thwart a "shot from the ayatollah direction" (e.g., Iran), not Russia. But after the Russian offensive, Poland also received Patriot PAC-3 missiles, which can counter shorter-range Russian missile systems. Tsar Wars met Star Wars, and at least in Poland and in the near term, Star Wars won, despite a Russian threat to attack Poland with nuclear weapons.

As for politically discrediting the European Union and NATO, Moscow may have had some success. "Fractured" describes the EU's political response to the Russian offensive. Core EU countries — meaning those in Western Europe who rely on Russian oil and gas — are once again reluctant defenders of democracy.

Kremlin recognition on Aug. 26 of South Ossetia and Abkhazia as independent states certainly damns nine years of EU and NATO diplomacy regarding Kosovo. In a column two weeks ago, I suggested Moscow would "invoke its interpretation of The Kosovo Precedent," and Moscow has done it.

Russians argue that Kosovo's spring 2008 unilateral declaration of independence from Serbia gives separatism resulting from invasion to protect an ethnic minority a political imprimatur. If protecting Kosovar Albanians elicits a NATO attack, in South Ossetia and other regions on Russia's border, Russia's "version of Kosovo" holds sway.

That may not be everything Russia wants — but at the moment it is a diplomatic point Russia has made with bullets.

To find out more about Austin Bay, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.


Comments

2 Comments | Post Comment
Somebody needs to explain why we would support a guy who decided to murder a bunch of folks for political purposes in the first place. Of course that's what Bush did by invading Iraq, but shouldn't we note that Saakashvili, by going down the same kind of path Bush did, ended up bringing upon himself the same kind of failure?
Comment: #1
Posted by: Masako
Thu Aug 28, 2008 6:18 PM
Comments will follow?

Look here
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_dmPchuXIXQ

http://www.zeitgeistmovie.com/

The refutation will be? We wait-with.



Ukraine is necessary to NATO. Whether it is necessary for NATO to the Ukrainian population? You have asked them? Ustchenko- the bastard. A trouble that he is your bastard. And with the overwhelming majority of the population of Ukraine behaves with American rudeness. Misters. Crimea will never belong to America and NATO. The wide mouth is time for slamming. And Ukraine of NATO without Crimea is unnecessary, is not that so? Correct, if it not so.

If you do not realize it, either do not want, or do not wish - a penny the price this world! Means so to that to be. The world will burn down. And even more quickly than you think.

You personally want to die in to the fire defending interests... And what actually you try to defend interests? A Union banking ńīrp.

Financed coming to power Hitler and not only. Arrest for infringement of the law on trade with the opponent during war has been imposed. And who was director and the vice- president a Union Banking Cīrp? Prescott Bush. The grandfather G. Bush.

Why all large-scale wars of last twentieth anniversary were spent under direction of presidents from family Bush? In what the reason of prompt expansion of an alliance at G. Bush? Carlyle group.

And can is better burn down alive? To die in to the fire.
Represent what there will be a torch? No! You do not represent!
It will be s o m e t h I n g
The most abrupt torch in the Universe. For the sake of it even it is necessary to try.
Basically you cost that to thrust you in the deepest ass.
All newest history of America continuous rotten stuff.
The ground at last that to get rid of all this rubbish and a stench under the name " rotten Americans "
In 1985 have been made public rules of conducting military actions in Vietnam: American army it was forbidden to bomb the Vietnamese antiaircraft systems before their full reduction alertness, it was forbidden to attack the major strategic purposes without the order from Washington. And thus about these restrictions Northern Vietnam has been informed. On it war last so long. The purpose of war in Vietnam was not a victory, but the fact of a proceeding war. War for the sake, of profit.

In 2005 president Bush has signed the official agreement on the North-American union which means the end of the present USA. Without approval of the congress, and people of the USA.

Somebody from you heard about it? New bank notes - ąmero - will soon appear.
Those who stand up for this agreement who owns world mass-media, the same persons.

And to you will not tell about that that it is not necessary to know. The North-American union is under construction under the same concept as the EC the American union, and soon and Asian, and the same people stand up for it.

The bankers who have created independent bank, the largest private bank in the world, independent of the government of the USA - Federal Reserve System.
And during necessary time all these unions will merge in a single whole, having generated a final part of the plan of those who worked above it more than 60 years.
*we shall have world government whether or not we like It.* –Paul Warburg council on Foreign relations. Architect of the Federal Reserve System

*we are grateful to the Washington post, the New York times, Tame magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years… the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government.* - David Rockefeller council on Foreign relations.
One bank, one army, uniform authority.

*give me control of a nation's money supply and I care not who makes its laws* -Mayer Amschel Rothschild
From a song of words you will not throw out.
The Federal Reserve is a private corporation/
Private Corporation/- Mares its own Policies- Money is Loaned at Interest
Created by bankers 1913, legalized by Woodrow Wilson.
The facts for the beginning will suffice? Or to add? Look here
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_dmPchuXIXQ

http://www.zeitgeistmovie.com/
The refutation will be? We wait-with.
Well as, in dung yet have not choked? And can all the same will get warm in beams of a nuclear fire? No, do not want? Then leave a deep notch on long noses of your selling politicians - Russian peacemakers and peacemakers in general to kill it is impossible! Interdiction! Or... Welcome in a hell...
Comment: #2
Posted by: virus
Sat Aug 30, 2008 4:15 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Austin Bay
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Judge Napolitano
Judge Andrew P. NapolitanoUpdated 16 Feb 2012
Austin Bay
Austin BayUpdated 15 Feb 2012
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 15 Feb 2012

4 Nov 2009 Cracking the Berlin Wall

10 Nov 2010 CIA Predator versus ACLU Subpoena: Warfare and Lawfare in the War on Terror

17 Oct 2007 Recognizing the Armenian Genocide