creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Austin Bay
Austin Bay
8 May 2013
The Global Stakes in the Sino-Indian Frozen War

This past Sunday, China and India agreed to avoid turning the world's most dangerous border dispute into the world'… Read More.

1 May 2013
Cybercrime Morphs Into Cyberwar

On April 25, Spanish police, at the request of Holland's national prosecutor's office, arrested Dutch citizen … Read More.

24 Apr 2013
Congo Complexity Will Test U.N. Offensive Peacekeeping

On March 28, the U.N. Security Council approved the creation of a war-making-peacekeeping unit, a … Read More.

The Grim Legacy Behind North Korea's Theater of Extortion

Comment

Call it North Korea's version of a '50s revival, though Pyongyang's 1950s retro is vicious Stalinist threat, not an evening of Chuck Berry and Elvis.

Earlier this month, North Korea's hereditary dictator, Kim Jong Un, revoked the Korean War armistice, signed 60 years ago in July 1953.

Revoking the armistice could signal a resumption of all-out hostilities. South Korea, the U.S., Japan and the United Nations recognize that. Given North Korea's record for repetitive, hot-headed threats, however, diplomats have reason to doubt imminent dire consequences. The Kim dynasty, a Marxist monarchy ruling North Korea's workers' paradise for three generations, has disclaimed or renounced the 1953 armistice at least a half-dozen times in the last two decades.

Since assuming power in late 2011 after the death of his father, Kim Jong Il, Jong Un has continued the dynastic tradition of threatening massive devastation. In February of this year, his regime threatened the U.S. with nuclear attack. In October 2012, while aboard a South Korean express train from Seoul to Cheonan, I saw a television news flash that informed me and my fellow passengers that North Korea had just threatened South Korea with nuclear immolation. Indeed, it appeared that everyone in that car had heard the threat before, ad nauseum.

South Korea and its allies have offered Pyongyang economic carrots, loans, oil, food and medical aid, and co-development projects designed to show the North that cooperation in lieu of conflict brings rewards.

Critics contend that the Kim regime steals the food aid and treats the economic incentives as money successfully extorted from its enemies. Proponents contend it acts as a brake on the North's worst impulses. Despite the latest revocation of the armistice, diplomats noted this week that so far North Korea has continued to permit South Korean managers to cross the Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) to work in Kaesong. Kaesong is a North Korean special economic area where North Koreans work for southern manufacturers.

Keeping Kaesong open is read by proponents of economic incentives as a signal that the rhetorical bellicosity is just bombast.

But treating North Korean ritual bellicosity and Cold War-era communist pomposity as merely theatrical ploys in an extortion shakedown would be a fatal error, for an appalling legacy of malice and slaughter lurks behind the Kim regime's aggressive antics.

Powerful military capabilities back the bombast. The Kim regime possesses a massive army well-supplied with artillery and armor. The regime's pursuit of nuclear weapons and its improving ballistic missile delivery systems give it inter-continental reach — within a few years North Korea could make good on a threat to incinerate Honolulu and Los Angeles. And no one who accounts for the legacy of malice can say with any assurance that North Korea will never launch a nuclear attack, no one in Seoul, Washington or, for that matter, in Beijing.

Despite the 1953 armistice, for four decades dynasty patriarch Kim Il Sung sent saboteurs, kidnappers and assassins south. North Korean special operations commandoes infiltrated the South. Deadly artillery barrages never stopped. In November 2010, Kim Jong Il's forces slammed South Korea's Yeonpyeong Island with 170 heavy artillery and rocket rounds. The attack struck several civilian targets, including a small shopping center. The March 2010 sinking of the South Korean Navy corvette the Cheonan (named after the city) was an outright act of war. Forty-three South Korean sailors died in the attack.

The 1953 armistice was supposed to end all armed hostilities on the Korean Peninsula and establish a reliable diplomatic mechanism for resolving disputes between Seoul and Pyongyang until, as the document says, "a final peaceful settlement is achieved." Ending the carnage of combat and resolving disputes would stabilize the North-South relationship and lead to a permanent peace treaty.

The armistice failed to achieve these goals. Why? Because the Kim dictatorship has never revoked war. And, aye, there's the rub.

To find out more about Austin Bay, and read features by other Creators writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2013 CREATORS.COM



Comments

0 Comments | Post Comment
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Austin Bay
May. `13
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
28 29 30 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31 1
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Walter Williams
Walter E. WilliamsUpdated 15 May 2013
Dennis Prager
Dennis PragerUpdated 14 May 2013
David Limbaugh
David LimbaughUpdated 14 May 2013

7 May 2008 Michael Yon's "Moment of Truth in Iraq"

14 Oct 2009 What Kind of Action in the World Justifies a Nobel Peace Prize?

12 Sep 2007 The Petraeus-Crocker Testimony