creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Austin Bay
Austin Bay
15 Feb 2012
Greek Fire, Euro-Roulette

Anarchists tossing firebombs celebrated the Greek government's latest round of economic austerity measures. … Read More.

8 Feb 2012
Syria: World War I Continues

In a Feb. 1 Wall Street Journal essay, the always eloquent and astute Fouad Ajami characterized Syria's … Read More.

1 Feb 2012
China's Sudan Dilemmas

Sudan and South Sudan's slow yet deadly war of blood for oil reserves has ensnared Africa's slyest empire builder:… Read More.

Super Sunday: Did Europe Dodge a War?

Share Comment

On Super Sunday, Europe dodged a shooting war ... but just barely.

Thank Serbia's electorate — at least 50.5 percent of them — as Serbia's current president, Boris Tadic, narrowly defeated "ultra-nationalist" Tomislav Nikolic. Tadic opposes renewed warfare and supports Serbia's economic and political integration with Western and Central Europe.

Nikolic looks east — to Russia. He doesn't shy from violent threats, either. "Ultra-nationalist" in the context of contemporary Eastern Europe and Central Asia is something of a euphemism for "21st century fascist." That's a freighted description, but Nikolic's "irredentist" land claims, insistent political exploitation of historical grievances and a violent brand of ethnic identity politics justifies it.

History does not repeat itself, not exactly. In 1933, a fascist didn't have nuclear weapons. Not that Nikolic does, either — but the day before the election he promised that if he were elected he would ask the Russia Air Force to patrol Serbian air space. Nikolic added that he stood "for military cooperation with Russia" and emphasized that he opposes a "NATO presence in Serbia in any form."

NATO peacekeepers still patrol Kosovo. Nikolic was telling Serbian voters he would toss NATO out of Kosovo — and remove the force that prevents renewed combat and ethnic cleansing.

Perhaps most Americans have forgotten the 1999 Kosovo War, the Clinton administration's war to stop a Serb-led genocide in Kosovo. Serbians haven't, Albanians haven't, nor has Vladimir Putin's newly muscular Kremlin. Perhaps Americans thought that "little" Balkan war was over and done. Serbs don't think so, Albanians don't, nor does the Kremlin.

The "Kosovo problem" was the primary election issue in Serbia. That made the election a major battle in that still simmering Balkan war. Fortunately, Serbs waged Sunday's battle with ballots instead of bombs. Unfortunately, with men like Nikolic getting 49 percent of the vote, bombs (whether delivered by unconventional ethnic and religious terrorists, or conventional strike aircraft) remain a terrifying possibility. In the Balkans, "little" events have a track record for igniting large-scale slaughter — with World War I as a bitter example.

The Kosovo conundrum is an ugly clash with no gentile resolution.

For the last nine years, the Kosovo tug or war between Belgrade and Kosovo's ethnic Albanian majority has challenged diplomatic creativity.

European Union and United Nations diplomats have explored several options, including a vague policy called "conditional independence," but ultimately either Kosovo becomes independent or in some fashion remains politically tethered to Serbia.

Kosovar Albanians demand independence. They claim they cannot be secure in any state dominated by Serbs.

Serbs demand Kosovo remain part of Serbia. Kosovo was the core of Serbia's medieval empire and is particularly dear to the Serbs. In 1389, Turkish Sultan Murad I's legions defeated Christian forces under Serbian Prince Lazar at the Battle of Kosovo. (Yes, in the Balkans, nations venerate defeats — not an optimistic sign.)

For the United States, NATO and the European Union, however, Russian intransigence, energy supplies and nuclear weapons are the most vexing issues framed by the Kosovo problem. The Kremlin, concerned about Chechnya, fears that Kosovo's "unilateral" independence will establish a "separatist precedent" for carving states from sovereign nations.

As the 21st century begins, Balkan and Eastern European nations are looking for new political accommodations — and these include joining NATO or the European Union. The idea is that "internationalization" and an "expanded political identity" dampen ethnic and nationalist passions and thus reduce the chance of conflict. The European Union is supposed to do this for Western and Central Europe (keep France and Germany from destroying each other). NATO and Partnership for Peace (PFP, also called "NATO Lite") are security organizations, but at the political level they serve the same purpose. For example, Hungarian and Romanian membership in NATO has greatly reduced the potential for conflict over Transylvania, a Romanian region with a significant ethnic Hungarian population.

This indirectly takes us back to Serbia. President Tadic received a solid majority of ethnic minority votes in Serbia, especially among ethnic Hungarians living in Serbia's Vojvodina region. Serbia's Hungarians see the benefit of the "expanded political identity" of the European Union. Pray that Tadic can nudge Nikolic's 49 percent in that "westerly" direction.

To find out more about Austin Bay, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.


Comments

2 Comments | Post Comment
"NATO peacekeepers still patrol Kosovo. Mr. Nikolic was telling Serbian voters he would toss NATO out of Kosovo — and remove the force that prevents renewed combat and ethnic cleansing."
With due respect, you might have missed some news though:
"Kosovo pogrom 2004" (Nebojsa Malic):
"It is Déjà vu in Kosovo, back to 1999. After four years of creeping secession and covert ethnic cleansing, the Albanians have taken the next step and begun a war on UNMIK, KFOR, and whatever Serbs remained after the 1999 war. Throughout the occupied province, Serb houses and churches are burning, UN offices and KFOR troops are under fire, and those non-Albanians who survived the ethnic cleansing of the past four years are fleeing for dear life, as mobs of well-armed and apparently closely coordinated Albanians continue their rampage. Since Wednesday, March 17, Kosovo has been a war zone."
http://www.antiwar.com/malic/?articleid=2164
This is only one article out of many.
Although I'm not an admirer or supporter of mr Nikolic, I think that some of the remarks in your article are questionable. Fact is that Nikolic made use of the feeling among many Serbians that the West has not shown much respect for them since the 1999 attack on the country and Milosevic's hand-over to ICTY. And that shows in elections.
Sincerely,
JJ van Kempen
The Hague, Netherlands
Comment: #1
Posted by: JJ van Kempen
Fri Feb 8, 2008 2:42 PM
The term of fascist actually belongs to the Kosovars, NOT the Serbs who actually fought against the fascists in WWII. I can understand that Mr Austin can play upon the ignorance of most of his readers, but that is propoganda, NOT thoughtful commentary. It is outlandish that he can support the ethnic cleansing of the Serbs from their OWN country, while denouncing their attempts to not be ethnically cleansed as genocide. Why is it OK for the Albanians to ethnically cleanse the Serbs? It is even more offensive when one sees NATO finish what Hitler started, which is to ethnically cleanse the Serbs from Kosovo.
The KLA and the government of Kosovo has never made it a secret of their plans. THEY are true fascists since they want an ethnically pure Kosovo without any Serbs, Gypsies or the few Jews that survived the Albanian SS regiment that served under the Nazis. Milosevic and the Serbs made it quite clear that any Kosovars who were willing to be loyal to Yugoslavia were more than welcome to stay in an ethnically mixed Kosovo. The KLA made damned sure that Serbs, Gypsies, and Jews were DEAD or gone.
I recall that when I was young, I asked my dad what he did in WWII. Just what do you think the SS troops told their sons about their service in WWII? Well son, I tried to kill all the damned Jews, Serbs, and Gypsies. We got most of the Jews but couldn't finish up on the Serbs or Gypsies.
As for peace coming about with the current government of Kosovo in place as an independent country that is a vain hope. They have already caused trouble in Macedonia with the ethnic Albanians there. They are still in favor of a greater Albania by taking parts of Serbia, and Macedonia. They have committed genocide against the Serbs in Kosovo, but that is OK since it is OK to kill Serbs like Hitler did. I would look elsewhere for the blame for any conflict rather than at the Serbs. The Serbs did not invade Macedonia and start killing off the poeple there as the KLA did. The KLA was classed as a terrorist organization until the US figured that they could be used as a hammer against the Serbs and Milosevic. The policy that the US followed in that case, will now come back against us with even more nasty results.
It is funny about his off the wall comment about Serbs being odd by celebrating a defeat. I guess Austin must consider Pearl Harbor to be a victory then. Just what does Mr Austin think the US should do when the KLA starts its offensive again against Macedonia and Serbia? The last time we helped them out. Will the US once again support genocide against the Serbs? How about the Macedonians.? Will the US do nothing to stop the Kosovars from doing what they have stated that they will do?
IN short, I suggest Mr. Austin use some common sense and decency for ALL,not just his pet butchers.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Randy Erb
Mon Feb 11, 2008 12:49 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Austin Bay
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Judge Napolitano
Judge Andrew P. NapolitanoUpdated 16 Feb 2012
Austin Bay
Austin BayUpdated 15 Feb 2012
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 15 Feb 2012

31 Jan 2007 The Battle of Najaf, 2007

1 Jun 2011 Cyberwarfare -- the Doctrine of Equivalence

14 Nov 2007 On Signing a Bomb