creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Austin Bay
Austin Bay
19 Jun 2013
The War Over Blood Ivory

For over three decades smuggling and selling illegally obtained blood diamonds and exotic minerals has made … Read More.

12 Jun 2013
No Denial on the Nile: Egypt Threatens Ethiopian Dams

In a humiliating example of self-inflicted electronic bugging, last week a live broadcast television … Read More.

5 Jun 2013
Protests Change Turkey's Political Landscape: A Report From Istanbul

To listen to Austin Bay talk about this column and the recent events in Turkey, click here. The late spring … Read More.

Al-Qaida Franchises Continue Terror War on the World

Comment

Four years ago, as his first term began, President Barack Obama ditched the name Global War on Terror (GWOT). Instead of fighting Al-Qaida-inspired terrorism around the world, the U.S. would conduct "overseas contingency operations" (OCO).

Obama's act of oratorical magic — poof, the global war has ended — became an awkward problem, however. Real world events subsequently demonstrated that the word "overseas" was at best misleading, if not outright wrong. Detroit, New York and Portland, Ore., certainly aren't overseas, yet militant Islamist-inspired terrorists tried (and fortunately failed) to bomb all three — Detroit on Christmas 2009, New York's Times Square in May 2010 and Portland in November 2010.

Obama still cannot call Maj. Nidal Hasan's terrorist attack at Fort Hood, Texas, (November 2009) a terrorist act. Hasan, however, had been in contact with militant Islamic cleric and al-Qaida recruiter Anwar al-Awlaki, who at the time was holed up in Yemen with al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP). Hasan praised Awlaki as a source of inspiration.

To his credit, Obama didn't make the mistake of equating Osama bin Laden's May 2011 demise with the end of al-Qaida. He came close in May 2012, on the first anniversary of bin Laden's death, however, when he declared, "The goal that I set — to defeat al-Qaida and deny it a chance to rebuild — is now within our reach."

The president can make a good case that al-Qaida circa 2001 has suffered severe losses in personnel as well as substantial material and moral damage. Eleven years of global military, political and financial warfare have drastically reduced al-Qaida's ability to serve as the central operational actor in a global war against everyone who does not share its crackpot vision of a global caliphate.

Military and police initiatives organized by the U.S. have led to the deaths or arrests of al-Qaida's most experienced commanders.

CIA drones have killed second-tier operatives (to include Awlaki, April 2012) who might have filled the leadership void. Dr. Ayman al-Zawahiri, the current supreme leader, lacks bin Laden's media savvy and charisma. He doesn't move the masses.

Events in Mali and Algeria, however, demonstrate that the fragment al-Qaidas (plural) of 2013 can still conduct spectacular massacres and attract global attention. Like AQAP in Yemen, al-Qaida in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) is an al-Qaida regional orchestrator.

AQIM sponsored the attack on Algeria's Amenas gas plant, which left 37 foreign workers dead. The Amenas slaughter, replete with real bullets, bombs, corpses and consequences, ought to call into doubt Obama's inaugural claim that "a decade of war is now ending." In fact, the president's claim, with which he begins his second administration, is as ludicrous as his first term's OCO prestidigitation.

The Obama administration has taken pride in its "African solutions to African problems" partnership approach to sub-Saharan African problems. Its goals are laudable: promote democracy while strengthening fragile states by emphasizing good governance and economic development. But if the administration wants to see its nascent African efforts blossom, it is going to have to continue to wage war on Africa's various al-Qaidas.

The International Institute for Counter-Terrorism recently surveyed several extremist factions associated with AQIM. They are a deadly jumble of religious anger and criminal talent, but quite capable of wreaking havoc from Algeria to Nigeria. Other al-Qaida-aligned factions plague east Africa.

Al-Qaida 2001's dark genius was to connect the Muslim world's angry, humiliated and isolated young men with a utopian fantasy preaching the virtue of violence. That utopian fantasy seeks to explain and then redress roughly 800 years of Muslim decline. That dark genius continues to empower the al-Qaidas of 2013.

Their war against the world continues. No matter what President Obama says, our war against them hasn't ended, either.

To find out more about Austin Bay, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2013 CREATORS.COM



Comments

2 Comments | Post Comment
Ignorance is the parent of fear. (Ishmael, Moby Dick.)
Al-Qaida preys on the ignorant and innocent using the words of their prophets as weapons of war instead of tools of peace to appease a God that doesn't exist.
Allah, Yahweh, I AM, the One God with many names is unknown to Al-Qaida and their supporters.
Do Christians and Jews even know their relationship and shared history with Muslims through Abraham and his sons?
Does today's Muslim know the Qur'an promises salvation for the righteous Christians who were there before the prophet Muhammad and praises Christians for being humble and wise?
Do Christians know their history, that they were deliberately kept ignorant and told they were not worthy to read the Bible, presuming they actually could read, and the Bible was banned for public consumption in order that the Church could manipulate and control the message?
That very similar to Al-Qaida, "the Church" led Christians to wage war against the world?
Somehow I don't think so.

"That dark genius continues to empower the al-Qaidas of 2013."

Seems to me the best way to defeat what you don't understand is first understand what you're fighting, ignorance and religious fervor cannot be defeated with an arsenal of weapons or millions of dead.
You have to take away it's power and dissect just what that power is.
When you have supposed men of God inciting you to violence for the glory of that God and your heavenly reward, you have the thrust of most religions and wars. Therein lies the power and completely out of juxtaposition to the teachings of the ancients and the wise and the prophets and mystics.

There's the rub, the wars are begun under the guise of religious differences, but it just ain't so.
Seems it's more about the haves and have nots.
When you have not, and are promised you will have; that you are chosen by God but you have to die first and kill the enemies of the God who grants this afterlife, what have you got to lose? What would you do?
It's a whole lot harder to get people's religious fervor riled up to fight against others and die when the living is easy and the promise of a better afterlife means we have to give up a pretty damn good here and now.
Comment: #1
Posted by: morgan
Wed Jan 23, 2013 8:28 AM
One other thought before this column expires, how about writing about who among the 'haves' is funding the al'Quida's of 2013? We all know they couldn't exist without some really, really, really big dollars behind them. Where's the money coming from to pay the guys (and take care of the family) of the freedom fighters/terrorists who strap the bombs on his body and dies for Allah or the cause of freedom? Who infiltrates these groups and/or financially supports them and their growth in order to further their own cause? Zealots here in America could start a 'freedom fighters' group or we're going to change the world group, but without outside financing, how long would it last?
Find out who's funding these freedom fighters/terrorists (depends on your point of view). We already know why.
Imagine the benefits to the Corporate gods if we need what they sell to support and fight their man-ufactured war on terrorism.
Industries are built around wars. Fortunes are made. Jobs created. People have a cause and an outlet for their frustration. Look at the war here at home, our war on drugs. Stop that war and hundreds of thousands of prison employees would lose their jobs, thousands of low level dealers will go under, the ripple effect. But because it would affect the very very rich, it's highly unlikely to happen. War and the war on drugs is biiig business and business is part of the new religion and money is the god they worship.
Comment: #2
Posted by: morgan
Sat Jan 26, 2013 9:08 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Austin Bay
Jun. `13
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
26 27 28 29 30 31 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 1 2 3 4 5 6
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Ray Hanania
Ray HananiaUpdated 20 Jun 2013
Larry Elder
Larry ElderUpdated 20 Jun 2013
Matt Towery
Matt ToweryUpdated 20 Jun 2013

2 Jan 2008 War -- or Crime -- in Cyberspace

29 Aug 2012 South Korean Struggles With Fewer Troops; U.S. Military With Fewer Dollars

20 Jun 2007 From Russian Tantrum to Collective Missile Defense