opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Austin Bay
Austin Bay
20 May 2015
Media Gotcha Distorts National Security Challenges

Determining actionable intelligence, assessing threats (current and emerging), implementing lines of … Read More.

13 May 2015
Election Year Security Challenge: Anticipating 2016's Benghazi

Foreign foes see U.S. presidential election years as opportunities to test and bedevil — which is a … Read More.

6 May 2015
Remembering Okinawa: Prelude to the Atomic Bomb

Okinawa's ground battle began April 1, 1945, when four American divisions simultaneously assaulted the 65-mile-… Read More.

Counter ISIL's Truck Bombs with Real Close Air Support


On May 20, in an "on background" briefing, a "senior State Department official" discussed the recent Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) attack on Ramadi, the capital of Iraq's Anbar Province.

Credit the senior official for setting straight Ramadi's history. Iraqi defenders didn't just bug out. ISIL struck Ramadi in January 2014, six months prior to attacking Mosul. When ISIL's blitz failed, Ramadi became a battle of attrition. For 18 months, ISIL fighters controlled "half the city." Attrition is a euphemism for killed and wounded. Iraqi forces suffered "thousands of casualties" in Ramadi. The briefer mentioned no specifics, but in March and April 2015, Iraq's Ramadi forces beat back repeated ISIL attacks.

Then the briefer turned to ISIL's assault of May 14: "Over the course of 96 hours in Ramadi, and what we've been able to collect ... (ISIL used) about 30 suicide VBIDs in Ramadi and the environs. ... Ten of them, I've been told, had the explosive capacity of an Oklahoma City type attack. So just to put that in perspective."

OK, so far. Then this follows: "If you look at the pictures that ISIL has put out of the explosions — I mean, I have some of them — it's just they took out entire city blocks."

Concern? That's warranted, but why the sense of breathless surprise at the destructive power of VBIEDs? Islamist terrorists used a VBIED to destroy the Marine barracks in Beirut (1983). An Al Qaeda VBIED leveled the US Embassy in Nairobi (1998). A huge VBIED destroyed the UN's Baghdad headquarters (2003). In March and April ISIL fighters used VBIEDs to support attacks in Ramadi.

VBIED (VBID) is a military acronym for Vehicle Borne Improvised Explosive Device. That translates in civilian as truck bombs, or conceivably, armored car bombs. Pack a vehicle with explosives and detonate it near a target. Oklahoma City domestic terrorist Tim McVeigh parked his truck bomb. In the Middle East truck bombs are typically employed as kamikazes.

Suicide drivers guide their trucks to targets. Kamikazes were smart weapons. So are VBIEDs. Drive and die instead of fly and die.

On May 14, ISIL used at least three VBIEDs in a near-simultaneous attack. The bombs detonated, leveling a city block. ISIL fighters followed the blasts with a ground assault.

ISIL's Ramadi tactical plan used VBIEDs the way US commanders employ an artillery preparation or airstrike. The prep fire lashes the target with firepower. If firepower fails to destroy the position, fair bet it momentarily disrupts defenders. That's the moment to assault with infantry and, if you have it, armor.

An example of ISIL professionalism? President Barack Obama endures deserved mockery for calling ISIL a "junior varsity," but — as noted — in Iraq assault VBIEDs are a common terrorist tactic.

The senior official later said an armored ISIL bulldozer cleared lanes prior to the VBIED strikes. What a big clue. The briefer indicated the dozer and armored VBIEDs were impervious to available Iraqi direct fire weapons.

Target: ISIL bulldozer conducting combat engineer operation. For a USAF A-10, the dozer is a dead duck.

So where, pray tell, was the close air support from Obama's anti-ISIL coalition?

Our senior official, now sounding disturbingly junior, if not sophomore, said: "We want to be very careful before we do airstrikes, because we're coming from the air, we don't have people on the ground."

No, we don't. And we didn't. Despite months of advice to the contrary, to deploy tactical air control teams. Syrian Kurds credit close air support with securing their victory in Khobane. No one provides close air support like the U.S. does. There is good reason to believe NATO forward observers controlled the air strikes from adjacent Turkish territory.

Yes, ISIL controls territory. Territorial control differentiates ISIL from its al-Qaida predecessor. Territory is a big ISIL propaganda pitch. But ISIL has to defend its territory. Our senior official claimed Iraqi forces are preparing to re-take Ramadi. Good. Will our non-anonymous senior government officials back Iraq's counter-attack with effective close air support?

To find out more about Austin Bay and read features by other Creators writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at



0 Comments | Post Comment
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right: comments policy
Austin Bay
May. `15
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
26 27 28 29 30 1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Authorís Podcast
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 1 Jun 2015
Lawrence Kudlow
Lawrence KudlowUpdated 30 May 2015
Mark Shields
Mark ShieldsUpdated 30 May 2015

19 Nov 2008 Background to the Iraqi-U.S. Security Agreements

14 Mar 2012 The Taliban's Killing Fields: History 2014?

25 Jul 2007 The Interagency Illness