opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Alexander Cockburn
Alexander Cockburn
13 Jul 2012
The End of America's Armies

Retired Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal, bounced out of his job for revels in Paris as witnessed by Rolling Stone, … Read More.

5 Jul 2012
Epitaph to a Dead Movement

It was very hard not to be swept away by the Occupy movement, which established itself in New York's Zuccotti … Read More.

29 Jun 2012
The Affordable Care Act: Decision Effects

It's tempting to say the Affordable Care Act decision spells the end of the Romney candidacy. The Mormon … Read More.

A Decade Dies, a Movement Dies


Hazlitt got gloomily drunk for a fortnight after the battle of Waterloo, accurately anticipating that decades of reaction lay ahead, now that Boney had been definitely put away, with the Holy Alliance in the saddle and the French contagion safely bottled up. Smart fellow, that Hazlitt. He should have stayed drunk for a month.

Sometimes, on the edge of a new decade, things look dismal, but one has the feeling that something good just might be around the corner. The '70s for example: At their onset, Nixon was in the high noon of his first term, presiding over frightful slaughter in Vietnam, while his Attorney General, John Mitchell, pored over plans to lock up the left at home. It looked as though darkest night was falling.

And yet there was a certain edgy, desperate hope in the air — and four short years into the '70s, the hopers, no longer desperate but exultant, saw Nixon clamber into a helicopter and take off from the White House lawn toward his version of St Helena, in San Clemente; and nine months later on April 30, 1975, Gunnery Sgt. Bob Schlager and 10 other Marines finally caught the last helicopter off the roof of the U.S. Embassy in Saigon.

Ah, those raucous, wonderful '70s. Those who missed them will never know the sweetness of life, as Talleyrand said of the Ancien Regime. Sweet and sharp. I spent them in New York. No better place to be. There was an exciting edge to life.

With the '80s, you could feel the air beginning to seep out of the tires. For one thing, Death kept missing his appointments in Samarra, after years of rigorous punctuality with Martin Luther King, Malcolm X and the Kennedy brothers. He'd already fumbled two dates with Gerald Ford, when his chosen messengers, Sara Jane Moore and Squeaky Fromme, messed up. On March 30, 1981, another of Death's chosen messengers, John Hinckley, tried to shoot Reagan and failed to get his man.

That would have been a game changer! We'd have had three months of Ron instead of eight weird years when America plunged into fantasy, where it still resides. We wouldn't have heard him give the Star Wars speech, or Nancy just saying no. Or Ron saying he expected Armageddon to come in his lifetime. Or Nancy running the country with the help of Mrs. Quigley, her astrologer. We'd have had George Bush Sr. ... surely a one-termer. It would have all been different ...

But would it really? Clinton and the '90s suited each other fine, and Bill gave us our last known dose of politics as fun, with the Lewinsky affair, but the decade would have had the same general contour — though a Republican president would have had much bigger problems getting the poor tossed off welfare.

And then in 2000, we had Bush and Gore, and the American people very reasonably couldn't figure out which one to go for.

The folks who knew Gore best — the voters of Tennessee — went for Bush. And then in September of Bush's first term, we had a game changer here in America. Death finally rounded up a gang of messengers with a real commitment to getting the job done.

But "game changer" aren't quite the words for the event that launched the Noughts. Sept. 11 just sped up basic tendencies that were already in train. Invasion of Iraq? The onslaught had been in full spate through most of Clinton-time via a lethal embargo — and the course of Iraqi politics had been set back in 1963, when the Kennedy administration okayed CIA complicity in the overthrow and murder of the Iraqi nationalist Gen. Kassim, setting the stage for the CIA's man, Saddam Hussein.

The Afghan mess is now about to get messier. It was set up in the late 1970s, when the Carter administration supervised the overthrow of Afghanistan's one shining moment of hope, the left reformist governments that took power in 1978. That's when Osama stepped into the stage of history as one of the CIA's men. Israel, the Palestinians? Rewind the decades back to Truman and beyond.

What made the American '70s exciting was the left — in its broadest antinomian contours — had life in it, still pumped up by successive radical generations all the way back to the beginning of the century. The last time we saw that left in action was in the presidential campaigns of Jesse Jackson in 1984 and 1988.

In 1992, the left went hook, line and sinker for Bill Clinton and lost all independent traction. By 1996, it had become a habit. Same story in 2000. Same again in 2004 (all in behind the Democrat Kerry, in case you forget) and finally, most deliriously, with the salesman of hope in 2008, Barack Obama. The left is dead and gone as a vital force in American political life. The corporations run the show and the only vivid opposition comes from Christian populists, who've brought several million copies of Sarah Palin's memoir.

The teens? Raise your glass along with Mr. William Hazlitt.

Alexander Cockburn is co-editor with Jeffrey St. Clair of the muckraking newsletter CounterPunch. He is also co-author of the new book "Dime's Worth of Difference: Beyond the Lesser of Two Evils," available through To find out more about Alexander Cockburn and read features by other columnists and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at



1 Comments | Post Comment
At the least the crazy right has a following. These are just the sad ramblings of an old coot gone way over the hill. The air started leaking out of your tires when you decided global warming is a hoax. Instead of worrying about your precious left, which actually blew it with its own intransigent arrogance in the late 60's and on into the "sweet and sharp" 70's for those of us who don't have Alzheimer's, think about the planet, which is rapidly headed toward the kind of demise you think you've reserved for your club of the vanishing politically correct. Don't worry, your old buddy Hegel (if you can still remember him through the fog) will revive the opposition. In human institutions there will always be the process of thesis, antithesis, and synthesis, just as power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. For the planet, however, the cycles are much longer, even though in the end, for the cycle we seemed to be trapped in now, our vast world is just a finite cage getting filled beyond its capacity with the ever over-breeding human rats we've become. So, speaking indeed of the ancien régime, visionaries like you might prepare to mourn the fact that we are about to become one, maybe the only one that should really count in our myopic view. Who will be next? Perhaps the socially adept ant (they kind of put us to shame) with a little more information processing capacity and human-engineered resistance to poisons of all kinds?
Comment: #1
Posted by: Masako
Sat Dec 26, 2009 11:17 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right: comments policy
Alexander Cockburn
Jul. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Linda Chavez
Linda ChavezUpdated 12 Feb 2016
Suzanne Fields
Suzanne FieldsUpdated 12 Feb 2016
David Limbaugh
David LimbaughUpdated 12 Feb 2016

22 Mar 2012 The Myth of the 'The Knowledge Economy'

5 Dec 2008 Shibboleth!

23 Jul 2011 Apocalypse Nigh?