creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Alan Reynolds
Alan Reynolds
22 Feb 2013
Hagel Proves Obama Won't Stop Iran

Does it matter that a nominee for secretary of defense doesn't particularly care for American power? Speaking … Read More.

5 Nov 2012
The Truth Hard to Dig Up Amid All the Attack Ads

Truth took a holiday this election season as the candidates plumped themselves up and tried to stick a needle … Read More.

2 Nov 2012
Awaiting Answers on Libya

Americans still don't know exactly what happened during the assault Sept. 11 on a U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi,… Read More.

Winning the Battle of the Fiscal Cliff

Comment

President Obama has succeeded in making the fiscal cliff debate about whether or not the Republicans will agree to higher taxes on the "wealthy." We need to switch the debate to whether or not the Democrats will accept cuts in spending.

To do so, Speaker John Boehner should insist on a ratio of spending cuts to tax increases (or revenue enhancements as he calls them) of at least 3:1. Then, he should tell the president that after the Chief Executive provides a list of spending cuts — apart from the defense budget — that he will propose a proportionate range of revenue increases.

By insisting on a ratio, and demanding that Obama put up his share before Boehner does his part, the speaker puts the onus where it belongs: on Obama to produce spending cuts. In effect, the speaker can say: "The size of the revenue increase is up to you, Mr. President. For each three dollars you identify in real spending reductions, we'll propose one dollar of tax increases. The more you cut, the larger the increase will be."

Boehner must insist that spending cuts focus on welfare entitlements. As Grover Norquist points out, past deals which involve ratios between spending and tax cuts — a la Bush-41 — never work out.

The spending cuts are usually in the discretionary budget. Even when they are made, they are often offset by increases in entitlement payments. Some even venture that the tax increases cause an increase in means tested entitlements by slowing down the economy and generating more unemployment.

We must realize that the spending increases and excesses of the Obama years have been concentrated in two sectors of the six parts of the federal budget. While defense, Medicare, Social Security and debt service budgets have risen only slightly, means-tested entitlements, like Medicaid, food stamps, welfare, rent subsidies, nutrition programs and such, have increased dramatically. The sixth part of the budget, non-defense discretionary spending, had also risen dramatically, but was reduced somewhat by the debt limit deal of the summer of 2011.

It is only by shifting the focus to spending cuts that we can win the battle of the fiscal cliff. And it is only by zeroing in on spending cuts that Boehner can maintain a semblance of party unity in the House.

To find out more about Dick Morris and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2012 DICK MORRIS AND EILEEN MCGANN

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM



Comments

0 Comments | Post Comment
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Alan Reynolds
Feb. `13
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Joseph Farah
Joseph FarahUpdated 15 May 2013
Walter Williams
Walter E. WilliamsUpdated 15 May 2013
Dennis Prager
Dennis PragerUpdated 14 May 2013

26 Apr 2007 What Supply-Side Economics Means

21 Dec 2006 Consumption Versus Income

17 May 2007 When "Progressive" Means Punitive