creators home
creators.com lifestyle web

Recently

Interplay DEAR SUSAN: No disrespect intended, but as a happily married woman, I have a take on fellow blogger J's situation: J, I've seen many of your posts, and in my eyes, you sound entitled and desperate. You constantly make references to …Read more. Single Land DEAR SUSAN: One of my fellow bloggers still seems a bit upset that he hasn't found a keeper yet. Well, I was in the same position he is. In fact, I have been in "single land" since 2007 and most likely will be for the rest of my time. But …Read more. Digging DEAR SUSAN: My definition of singlehood is not having a significant other. I'm reminded of my own singleness every day when I see couples together — contrasted with the way singles are treated. I personally have no desire to stay unmarried. …Read more. Common Cause DEAR SUSAN: I find that most angry/bitter single people are that way because they are trying to date "up" instead of looking for someone who has more in common with them financially and in terms of appearance and fitness. Think about it! …Read more.
more articles

The Sexual Constellation

Share Comment

Most of us want sexual activity to mean something, to stir our emotions, to have a feeling of rightness. The final judge is, of course, the morning after — when your spirit feels tingly and warm, snugly secure in the knowledge that you are the beloved, the only one your Other holds dear, the one your partner prizes above all others. (I could wax even more lyrical, but you get the idea.) Sex without caring is on the lowest rung of human interaction. Period. No discussion warranted.

Mature sexuality is a reaction to an entire package — one special person in his/her totality — not to a collection of isolated body parts. When the wholeness of someone encompasses qualities that inspire love, trust and respect (a sacred trinity if ever there was one), then — and only then — can deeper dimensions of a relationship emerge. The soulful dimension of human nature craves spiritual union, and once it's experienced, nothing less will do. But to reach that point, souls must merge before bodies. Only later, after partners have invested time revealing themselves to each other, does sexual activity feel natural — and right.

The configuration of relatedness can be seen as a constellation. At the center — its sun and sole source of energy — is loving friendship (aka intense liking). Constancy of that good will is absolutely essential to the health of the relationship; in fact, it's the one factor that binds the other components and keeps them in place. And circling close to that core are other elements akin to it, ones that nourish togetherness and promote mutual benefit.

Compassion, sense of humor, open communication and honesty qualify for that top spot. As these nourish the basic liking/loving, partners start to know and trust each other. Huge chunks of time must be invested for this to happen. The payoff is even bigger, easy compatibility and a sense of comfort with each other. Certainly worth the effort!

Only after partners share this level of trust can they be honest bedmates. So sex is the very last part of the personal universe to take its place. The continuing expression of everything that takes place outside the bedroom, lovemaking is the ultimate component in this most personal universe. And like anything this rare, the joining of souls takes time to unfold. It simply cannot be hurried or compromised. The waiting period is a test of both partners' character and maturity, and for that reason alone, it is valuable.

But the prime reason to create the sexual constellation tantalizingly slowly is that sexuality can deliver its full promise only when lovers are the best of friends. If you're unsure whether it's worth the wait, consider this sacred poem by Rumi:

"When the soul lies down in that grass,

The world is too full to talk about.

Ideas, language, even the phrase 'each other'

Doesn't make any sense."

That depth of bonding sends lovers back into the world better people, with a stronger sense of well-being. Refreshed, sure of their beloveds, surer of themselves. In a wry twist, in the losing of their boundaries they find a stronger sense of self.

Write to Susan Deitz in care of this newspaper. She will answer all letters that come with a self-addressed, stamped envelope. Or you may e-mail her at info@creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM


Comments

6 Comments | Post Comment
HEY sUSAN, I did commment, but don't see it so will do it agian. Why do the ones that don't care when having sex the ones that end up caring and find someone? Why is it, in life, the ones that do care from the onset the ones that are single?
Comment: #1
Posted by: Jack Olds
Wed Feb 3, 2010 9:43 AM
I've never heard such sentimental hogwash in my whole life. Women who actually think this way (hard to imagine) are setting themselves up for a lifetime of disappointment.

Some relationships start with sex and flourish, others go nowhere. Same thing can happen when sex is delayed. It depends on the two people involved. End of story.

As for a supposed advice columnist who writes "Sex without caring is on the lowest rung of human interaction. Period. No discussion warranted", I would reply well, then, end of discussion. You are obviously closed to any point of view other than your own narrow, puritanical one.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Claire Beatty
Wed Feb 3, 2010 10:45 AM
Apparently, Commentator #1 has never had this beautiful kind of relationship; perhaps HER mind is the closed one? Your opinion is just that - yours. Your bitterness fairly leaps off the page. Don't presume to speak for every human out there - we all have our own thoughts and feelings on what is or isn't right - as do you.
Comment: #3
Posted by: E MacRae
Wed Feb 3, 2010 3:21 PM
Apparently, Commentator #1 has never had this beautiful kind of relationship; perhaps HER mind is the closed one? Your opinion is just that - yours. Your bitterness fairly leaps off the page. Don't presume to speak for every human out there - we all have our own thoughts and feelings on what is or isn't right - as do you.
Comment: #4
Posted by: E MacRae
Wed Feb 3, 2010 3:22 PM
Re: E MacRae : No, you're right, I've never had this kind of claptrap sentimental relationship, nor has anyone I've ever known, because they don't exist except in the minds of women like Susan "Ditz" (or you?) who live in a make-believe Hallmark world. Show me ONE straight man who claims to honestly think this way, and I will show you a liar and hypocrite who tells women what they want to hear. And for the record, no, I am not bitter, I am realistic. I've been happily married twice (amicable split with number 1 after 16 years; married to number 2 for almost 12 years now). I never claimed to speak for every human being - no idea where you got that - but if there are young impressionable women reading this column, I'd hate for them not to hear another point of view.
Comment: #5
Posted by: Claire Beatty
Wed Feb 3, 2010 8:09 PM
Claire Beatty - Bitter and negative. And contrary to your claim, you don't want to hear any point of view except your own. I rest my case.
Comment: #6
Posted by: E MacRae
Fri Feb 5, 2010 10:17 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
Other similar columns
Amy Alkon
The Advice Goddess
by Amy Alkon
Jan Denise
Larry Meeks
Ethnically Speaking
by Larry Meeks
More
Susan Deitz
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month