creators home
creators.com lifestyle web

Recently

Players Reveal What Poker Has Taught Them About Themselves, Life Many poker players apply math and people-reading skills at the table. The better they do at both, the greater chance they have to beat the game. But what, in return, has poker given them? At a recent charity hold 'em tournament, I asked 10 players …Read more. WSOP Eyes More Records With Added Events and Tables for 2012 Raise your hand if you were surprised last year when the World Series of Poker broke the overall record with 75,672 entries. Yeah, me, too. The 2011 total prize pool was a staggering $191,999,010 — also the largest ever and no doubt a shocker …Read more. To Win $10,000 WSOP Seat, Inexperienced Players Need a Plan The range of poker skills at this weekend's charity tournament in Rock Island, Ill., will be as wide as you can imagine. Consider this email from Tom S., a local amateur player: "The tournament you wrote about last week seems too good to pass …Read more. $10,000 World Series Seat up for Grabs at Quad-Cities Poker Fundraiser The biggest Quad-Cities poker event since casino boats with card rooms floated into town 20 years ago is just a few days away. Unofficially, the Texas hold 'em fundraising tournament on Feb. 4 at the Jumers Casino Event Center in Rock Island, Ill., …Read more.
more articles

Texas Player Asks If All-In Move With Pocket Jacks Was Correct

Share Comment

A reader in Texas questions his play with pocket jacks in a tournament after being re-raised by an opponent in the small blind. Let's sort through his options.

Q: Early in a tournament with blinds at 10-20, I raised to 75 with pocket jacks and the small-blind player re-raised to 275. My initial reaction was to just call and then move all-in after the flop if no overcards came, which they didn't. Instead, I pushed all-in, he called with A-K suited and beat me when an ace came on the river. What do you think? — Cecil O. in Kaufman, Texas.

A: This is a great question, Cecil, because pocket jacks can be a tricky hand to play in Texas hold 'em.

You don't say what position you were in — early, middle or late — but as the first player entering the pot you certainly needed to raise. Your bet of 75 chips, nearly four times the big blind, was just about the perfect size to force out most drawing hands, small pairs and anyone holding ace-rag.

But A-K is a different story. Nobody is going to lay down A-K in that spot, and his re-raise to 275 was pretty standard, putting the pressure back on you.

You had four choices at that point:

Fold — Definitely not your best option, unless you knew the player well and were certain he only would make that play with pocket aces, kings or queens. If you thought he had A-K or A-Q, you certainly couldn't fold.

Call — A smart play. You had position on your opponent, acting last on each betting round. That gave you a built-in edge in making betting decisions. Your first instinct was a good one — "wait until after the flop to move all-in if no overcards came and have a lot better chance to make him lay down A-K."

Raise again — Not the best choice because a raise to, say, 700 chips would have left you pot-committed — too heavily invested to fold.

Remember, it was early in the tournament and you had plenty of time to recover if you lost this hand. This play works only if your opponent was on a stone-cold bluff, thinking he could push you off your hand.

Move all-in — A reasonable but risky play. If he held a bigger pocket pair, you'd be a huge four-to-one underdog. If you thought he had A-K or perhaps A-Q, then pushing all-in as a slight favorite was an aggressive move that could double your stack and put you in a strong chip position. The downside, of course, was possible early elimination.

You chose the second-best option by moving all-in, and I can't fault your aggressiveness. Unfortunately, however, you actually did your opponent a favor.

Many players today like to play A-K boldly. They happily push all-in pre-flop, knowing they'll get to see all five board cards without having to make tough betting decisions after the flop if they don't hit an ace or king right away. My guess is he gladly snap-called your all-in bet.

The math says that's a good move with A-K. There's a 50 percent chance an ace or king will hit the board at some point, but only a 32 percent chance one will come on the three-card flop. An even-money bet is a green light for most players.

That's why I think just calling his 275-chip re-raise would almost always be the best play, except when you are short-stacked and have to make a stand. Following your first instinct — to just call, then move all-in if no overcards hit the flop — probably would have won you the pot.

That said, Cecil, I've seen many players refuse to give up on A-K after a worthless flop, despite just a 13 percent chance of hitting an ace or king on either the turn or river cards. If your opponent was that type of gambling player, then your bust-out on this hand was unavoidable.

E-mail your poker questions and comments to russ@luckydogpoker.com for use in future columns. To find out more about Russ Scott and read previous LuckyDog Poker columns, visit www.creators.com or www.luckydogpoker.com.

COPYRIGHT 2009 RUSS SCOTT

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM


Comments

0 Comments | Post Comment
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
Other similar columns
Andy Seamans
The Answer Man
by Andy Seamans
Paul Paquet
Trivia Bits
by Paul Paquet
peter rexfod
Treasure Hunt
by Peter Rexford
More
Russ Scott
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month