creators home
creators.com lifestyle web

Recently

Later Love DEAR SUSAN: My mom was in her late 50s when she found love again after divorcing my dad. She used an online dating site to find it — but this was before the site you mentioned existed. It seems a fine match, and they have been married for …Read more. A Perfect 10 DEAR SUSAN: I had to laugh at the letter from a man describing himself as a "Richard Gere" looking for a woman who is a professional, intelligent and a perfect 10. The problem might just be in his math! I've noticed that men rate …Read more. Choose Happiness DEAR SUSAN: This positive advice is for a fellow blogger, who seems to be having a hard time: It takes work to escape the comfort zone that keeps you making the same mistakes. (It's easier if you have the help of a good therapist, but people have …Read more. The Uninvited DEAR SUSAN: Your column on being left out of a couple's world has made me respond to an advice columnist for the first time in my life. The problem is much bigger than you seem to realize. When I was part of a couple, we did a lot of socializing. I …Read more.
more articles

Neediness

Share Comment

DEAR SUSAN: In general, the more desperate one is the less likely one should do it. Desperation and impulsiveness alone are excellent signals that a person is about to do something foolish, that the emotions are too strong for a wise choice, and that it's a good time to postpone the action or to bring in a calm third party. A desperate need to marry — now, today — may not in every case be a big fat sign you shouldn't marry today, but in perhaps 99 cases out of 100, it really, really is. — From the "Single File" blog

DEAR BLOGGER: Walking around this old globe while sending out needy signals tells everyone you meet that you're an empty vessel in extreme need of a filling station, i.e., the first partner willing to do the work. But don't kid yourself; the filling-station partner demands a fee, and the transaction isn't pretty. In return for filling the need for love, the partner demands a pound of flesh — which, in this case, means total surrender of personal power and identity. The awful irony of this sort of partnership is that much resentment builds up in the person being "filled." The love that person so badly needed turns to anger quite quickly, and a bad ending is in store. No one except yourself can make you feel loved until you love yourself.

None of us wants the burden of holding up another person. Men have given up the savior role and wisely encouraged us to save ourselves. And we're up to the challenge.

The lesson is that no one outside ourselves can fill our needs. Yes, of course, there is romantic love, the one need that can only be filled by another.

But it's a huge mistake to make it a primary need, to define yourself by what you lack. For sure, romance is delicious, but while it's not in the stars, make it incidental. Get out there and sparkle.

DEAR SUSAN: It's pretty clear that most singles are having lots of sex. Dating today does encompass either sex or the near-future possibility of it. You just have to go where the singles are to know that. It's OK that you have an old-fashioned and conservative view, but it's not been the norm for at least a few decades. There are even plenty of surveys that have shown just that. And for the record, I don't think it's bad or wrong to hang out with a friend of the opposite sex, but if you are not sleeping together and have no intention of doing so, then you're not dating. And that's fine, too. I'm not passing any value judgment. But it's unrealistic and totally out of touch to suggest that dating doesn't necessarily include sex. — From the "Single File" blog

DEAR BLOGGER: Odd that my survey of single sexuality (nationwide, drawing 1,900 responses) shattered the myth of the swinging single. I began the project sensing that the unmarried may have a brief flare-up of bed-hopping immediately after a divorce — sensing newfound freedom — but that proved unsatisfactory pretty quickly. So most of the divorced and widowed quickly reverted to the conservative take on sex they had before marriage. And the swinging? Mostly done by the married, escaping the feeling of being "owned" or adding zest to the same old, same old. Are you saying that dating is always sexual and that if it isn't, well, it just ain't a date? Whoa. Time to mull this one over. Readers' comments are very much welcome.

Have a question for Susan? Send it to her in care of this newspaper or online at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2012 CREATORS.COM


Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment
No, but dating always includes the possibility of sex at some future date, which is the important point. If there isn't sexual interest, or the possibility of sexual interest in the near future, then it's not dating. Then it's just friends hanging out.

That's what makes the difference between being a friend and being a girlfriend or a boyfriend. Dating is the way we get to know people better to see if they might be "the one" -- and while it's not *just* about sex, it must of course *include* sex at some point to be realistic.

It's not about swinging, either, that's irrelevant. I'm not suggesting that dating = sex for every single date. I'm certainly not saying that if you don't have sex on a first date, something is wrong. Or even the second, third, etc.

But if you have been "dating" someone for many months and sex hasn't happened and isn't even close to happening and hasn't been even discussed, then it's pretty clear your "in the friend zone", and not relationship bound.

Unless, of course, we're talking about teenagers, but I assumed we were talking about adults.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Mike H
Tue Jan 24, 2012 4:39 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
Other similar columns
Amy Alkon
The Advice Goddess
by Amy Alkon
Jan Denise
Larry Meeks
Ethnically Speaking
by Larry Meeks
More
Susan Deitz
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month