The Last Fish Ocean fish are the last wild creatures that people hunt on a large scale. We used to think of the ocean's bounty as endless until recently, when we have discovered its limits. Between 1950 and 1994, ocean fishermen increased their catch 400 percent …Read more. Poorer But Happier The National Opinion Research Council tries to quantify how happy Americans are with a yearly poll. Since 1950, the number of Americans responding that they were "very happy" has steadily declined. Between 1970 and 1994, it dropped five full points, …Read more. Carrying Capacity of Spaceship Earth Carrying Capacity of Spaceship Earth Some scientists say that not only are we living beyond Earth's carrying capacity, but we are also eating up future generation's ability to live within Earth's means. We are emptying the Earth's bank account, …Read more. Localization Instead of Globalization Recently, we have seen the effects of globalization. As local jobs are increasingly outsourced and recessions continue to loom, we should realize that it just isn't working. Economist and author Michael Shuman notes, "About 42 percent of our economy …Read more.more articles
Carrying Capacity of Spaceship Earth
Estimates of the Earth's carrying capacity vary according to which population you're measuring because some populations live more sustainably than others. Some scientists say that not only are we living beyond Earth's carrying capacity, but we are also eating up future generations' ability to live within Earth's means. We are literally emptying the Earth's bank account rather than living off the interest, as our ancestors have done, and leaving a "balance due" for future generations.
British geographer Ernst George Ravenstein is credited with first estimating the carrying capacity of the Earth to around 6 billion. Presently, at 6.5 billion, at least a billion of our population does not receive enough food energy to carry out a day's work. Even through Ravenstein was operating on statistics from last century, he hit fairly close to home.
Before Ravenstein, the English clergyman Thomas Robert Malthus argued that human population always increases more rapidly than food supplies and that humans are condemned to breed to the point of misery and starvation. The 200 years since Malthus' essay was first published have proven him wrong. We can artificially increase food production above birth rates and even decline in numbers in the presence of plenty.
The World Hunger Program at Brown University estimated based on 1992 levels of food production and an equal distribution of food that "the world could sustain either 5.5 billion vegetarians, 3.7 billion people who get 15 percent of their calories from animal products (as in much of South America), or 2.8 billion people who derive 25 percent of their calories from animal products (as in the wealthiest countries)."
Clearly we have passed all sustainable estimates and are now entering the "borrowed time" area of the population chart.
This is not a new chapter in human history. We have faced starvation before and triumphed. According to Lester Brown, "In the 15th century, Icelanders realized that overgrazing of their grasslands was leading to soil erosion. Farmers then calculated how many sheep the land could sustain and allocated quotas among themselves, thus preserving their grasslands and a wool industry that thrives today."
Here are some steps you can take to reduce your ecological footprint.
—Measure your ecological footprint at MyFootprint.org.
Shawn Dell Joyce is an award-winning columnist and founder of the Wallkill River School in Orange County, N.Y. You can contact her at Shawn@ShawnDellJoyce.com. To find out more about Shawn Dell Joyce and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.
COPYRIGHT 2012 CREATORS.COM