Recently
'Iron Man 3': Robert Downey Jr.'s International Man of Metal Returns
The most surprising thing about "Iron Man 3" — which is otherwise pretty much what you'd expect, in spades — is its unanticipated sense of finality. The movie plays out like the concluding installment of a standard trilogy, …Read more.
'Mud' and 'Deceptive Practice: The Mysteries and Mentors of Ricky Jay': Matthew McConaughey Scores Again, and Ricky Jay Defies Belief
Matthew McConaughey's midcareer resurgence is a glorious thing, and it continues with "Mud." Over the past decade, McConaughey has sometimes wasted his talent in dim rom-coms ("How to Lose a Guy in 10 Days," "Failure to …Read more.
'Oblivion' and 'Upstream Color': Tom Cruise Copes With a Post-apocalyptic Future, New Indie Offers a Baffling Present
"Oblivion" is a light sci-fi snack of gently pre-chewed elements from other, meatier futuristic movies. Biding your time as these familiar tokens drift by — the "Blade Runner" identity games, the hovering white pods and …Read more.
'To the Wonder' and 'Disconnect': Terrence Malick Stuck on Repeat, Jason Bateman Standing Tall in the Cyber-Dark
Sitting through Terrence Malick's "To the Wonder" is like watching a stranger sort through a packet of old photographs. To the photographer, the snapshots recall a story. To us, they're disconnected episodes in an unknown narrative. The …Read more.
more articles
|
'The Great Gatsby': An Old Classic ReimaginedKurt Loder is off this week. The following review is by Peter Suderman. After seeing "The Great Gatsby" in hip-hopified 3-D, I'm looking forward to the other similarly hip updates on other early-20th-century literary classics, which are sure to follow if the new "Gatsby" is a success. Imagine: "Ulysses," in Imax! "The Old Man and the Sea," the ride! "The Awakening," in Smell-O-Vision! Director Baz Luhrmann's ecstatic, occasionally spastic, adaptation of F. Scott Fitzgerald's 1925 novel isn't much less ridiculous than any of those ideas, yet what's surprising is that parts of it work anyway — not in spite of Luhrmann's revisionism but because of it. What Luhrmann loses in nuance and tonal faithfulness, he makes up for with glitz, bombast and zest. He doesn't adapt the book so much as extract its key components, strap on some fireworks and then let the whole thing explode. In some ways, the adaptation is quite faithful to the source material. Fans of the book will find all the book's major story elements, slightly rearranged to maximize cinematic impact, as well as a heavy dose of direct quotation, both in dialogue and voice-over narration. The story, about mysterious new-money gazillionaire Jay Gatsby (Leonardo DiCaprio) and his quest for a lost love, is still told by his wide-eyed young neighbor, Nick Carraway (Tobey Maguire). Old-money rivals Daisy Buchanan (Carey Mulligan) and her husband, Tom (Joel Edgerton), still live in a mansion just across the water from Gatsby's palace, and there's still a pileup of late story complications involving an auto mechanic (Jason Clarke), his lusty wife (Isla Fisher) and the crooked businessman Meyer Wolfsheim (Amitabh Bachchan). But where Luhrmann departs from Fitzgerald's book is in his tone. Despite the presence of Carraway's narration, the story is no longer presented as an individual's inner experience. Instead, Luhrmann has transformed it into a celebratory spectacle — part music video, part high-budget Broadway production, part club-thump dance party. The movie's nightlife energy is hypnotic at times, but it also can be distracting.
Yet even still, it's an impressive spectacle, especially in candy-colored 3-D. And for a while, it's exhilarating. But I could only take so much. After a nonstop hour or so, it became exhausting, an experience more akin to watching a two-hour commercial for a high-concept take on "The Great Gatsby" than watching the actual movie. When Luhrmann eventually does slow down for a beat or two, the movie loses its drive. The director seems to have no idea what real human interaction is like — and no interest, either. If it's not a party, it's not worth his time. It doesn't help that he seems to have coached his actors into overly broad, theatrical performances that sometimes seem more like soap opera than cinema. The lone exception is DiCaprio. The 38-year-old actor is well-cast as the mysterious central character, a man of great riches and great anxiety who is trying to convince the world and himself that he's not a fake. But the other performers are simply props; it's always Luhrmann who holds center stage with his tireless vision of partying and privilege. He's interested not in what the characters said or thought but in what they did and how it felt. That sensibility makes the movie something of an exhausting mess, but it's also a gorgeous, glorious, over-the-top vision and an innovative attempt at reimagining an older classic for a modern audience. Is it the sort of thing that ever could work again? I'm skeptical. But to find out for sure, I suppose we'll just have to wait for the sequel. Peter Suderman is a film critic for The Washington Times. To find out about Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com. COPYRIGHT 2013 CREATORS.COM
|
||||||||||||||||||





























