Amazon.com Dear Mr. Berko: I'm 75. I never have been in stocks — except for my state pension, for which I did not pick the investments. I enjoy reading your column, but I don't understand everything you say. I have another $25,000, 5 percent certificate …Read more. Congress, Taxes and Greed Dear Mr. Berko: Why is President Barack Obama reducing the amount of our future Social Security income increases, and why is he limiting the amount of money we can invest in our individual retirement accounts and 401(k) programs? I voted for Obama …Read more. A Managed Risk Dear Mr. Berko: This may sound undoable, but I would like to be an aggressive investor with five or six speculative stocks that have good long-term potential (not more than three years) and get a dividend income of 5 to 6 percent. I have done some …Read more. Can You Hear Me Now? Dear Mr. Berko: I bought 100 shares of Verizon in October 2008 for my individual retirement account because I had the spare cash and because I was a Verizon Wireless customer. I'm not a Verizon customer today (the company's customer service and …Read more.more articles
The Other Side of Tenopah
Dear Mr. Berko: We have two questions: You suggested a reader watch your columns for high-yield convertible bonds and preferred stocks. Our paper stopped printing your column, so we don't have access to investments paying 9 percent or better. We have $400,000 in a conservative stock trust fund yielding 3 percent or $12,000 in dividends. And until next month, we are earning $20,000 annually from a 5 percent, $400,000 CD (also in our trust) for a total income of $32,000, which pays our mortgage, taxes, cable, insurance, auto and utilities. We also have a fine income from business interests that cover our other living and entertainment costs.
We would like to invest $220,000 of our $400,000 CD in high-yield bonds and preferreds at 9 percent to earn $20,000 so we'll have the $32,000 to cover our above expenses. Please recommend 10 to 15 issues we could buy.
Our next question concerns another solar boondoggle. Our neighbor, a former Illinois legislator with Washington connections, told us that Nancy Pelosi caused the Energy Department to loan $1.3 billion for a solar energy project in her home state that will employ 300 people including her husband's brother, Ronald Pelosi. Is this true? My sister and I would appreciate your comment. — SH in Waukegan, Ill.
Dear SH: My dad used to say, "Ninety-five percent of the rumors we hear about political influence and graft gives the remaining 5 percent of political rumors a bad rap!" That's why I defined politics years ago as two words: "poli," a large number, and "tics," bloodsucking parasites. Your neighbor doesn't have his innuendos straight, and his spoutings are pure balderdash, according to one of the few members of Congress whom I trust.
Here's the other side: This solar project is in Sen. Harry Reid's state of Nevada, and the amount of money is $737 million. And this is not a loan but a federal guarantee to investors putting up the money. It's called the Tonopah Solar Project and won't cost taxpayers a penny unless Tonopah defaults, at which time the Department of Energy makes the investors whole.
Nancy Pelosi has nothing to do with Tonopah, which was approved by the DOE in September of 2011. The group that proposed the project is Pacific Corporate Group (PCG). It seems to me pure happenstance that Nancy's brother-in-law, who doesn't know bupkis about solar power, joined PCG's board in April of 2011 as a "special" consultant. Tonopah's $737 million will employ 45 people permanently, while the remaining 255 people will be employed temporarily to build the facilities. And PCG tells us, "We expect to create more than 600 direct jobs on the project site." The operative word here, of course, is "expect." But there are no politics involved, so everything is transparent and above board. However, $737 million is lot of dough to build a windmill in the Nevada desert.
It's sad that the Fed's low interest rate policies are forcing so many retired folks to invest large portions of their assets in risky, high-yield securities to maintain their standard of living. But I don't see you and Sis in that class. Perhaps Congress will consider a "Senior CD Program" to help needy retired folks increase their CD incomes. This could be financed by eliminating some corporate welfare programs, reducing oil, gas, farm and export subsidies, cutting back on various business and foreign loans plus a few billion dollars in pork spending.
But I won't recommend various high-yield investments because I'm not comfortable with the responsibility of replacing 50 percent of your CDs with high-risk investments. You need the assistance of a knowledgeable and experienced money manager. That professional can help you safely improve your 3 percent portfolio yield to 5.5 percent, producing $22,000 in annual dividend income rather than $12,000, which still leaves you $10,000 short for your home expenses.
This professional might also recommend investing just $110,000 of your $400,000 CD in a dozen high-yield issues with a 9 percent return. Now you and Sis will have enough to cover your housing expenses, and you won't have to touch the income from your business interests. Isn't that just ducky?
Please address your financial questions to Malcolm Berko, P.O. Box 8303, Largo, FL 33775, or email him at firstname.lastname@example.org. To find out more about Malcolm Berko and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.
COPYRIGHT 2012 CREATORS.COM