Diamonds An Investor's Worst Enemy by Malcolm Berko on Creators.com

Recently

Children's College Savings Dear Mr. Berko: I'm 30, make a good living as a plumber and have two children ages 4 and 6 who are in preschool while my wife works part-time at Walmart. We want to provide for their college and need to know how to invest $150 to $200 a month for …Read more. The Volcker Rule and Direct TV Dear Mr. Berko: I have followed your column for over 30 years and don't know of any columnist, financial or otherwise, who has lasted so long. My father-in-law, who now lives with us, remembers your column in the Clearwater, Fla. newspaper in 1978. …Read more. Teen Investor Dear Mr. Berko: I am 14 and have saved $3,300 in the last three years. I help my Dad in his construction business, mixing concrete and unloading trucks of lumber, plywood and plasterboard to build homes, dig footers and operate a backhoe or a …Read more. Tax Reform Vs. Simplification Dear Mr. Berko: I'm 51 and make a good living as a self-employed professional. I employ four people, including my wife, and have been doing my personal/business tax returns for 28 years. This year was the last straw. I actually began to revel in …Read more.

Diamonds An Investor's Worst Enemy

Dear Mr. Berko: I'm a 35-year-old physician, and I'm finally getting married. A jeweler in Chicago has shown me a nearly flawless, $58,000, 5-carat diamond for my fiance. It's a wonder to look at and seems like it could be a good investment. When I asked the jeweler how much this stone could be worth in 10 years, he couldn't answer me. So I'm putting this question to you. — WS, Chicago

Dear WS: I've always wondered how jewelers can advertise and sell a 1.7-carat diamond for $1,995 that they claim was just marked down from $5,995 and still make a profit. However, I clearly recall an angry 2006 letter from a couple in Cincinnati who bought a 3.4-carat engagement ring in 1993 for $32,000. When they tried to sell the diamond ring in early 2006, there wasn't a single jeweler in the Chili City who would give them more than $11,000. So 10 years hence, you might be able to sell that rock for $18,000 to $20,000.

Diamonds are not rare — at least not in the economic sense — because their supply has always exceeded their demand. The DeBeers cartel, which controls 70 percent of the world's supply, purposely maintains an artificial scarcity. The DeBeers folks stockpile their mined diamonds, and then they sell them in small amounts to a select group of carefully screened diamond merchants at various times during the year.

These stones are only carbon atoms, but DeBeers Chairman Nicholas Oppenheimer said it best: "Diamonds are intrinsically worthless except for the deep psychological need they fill." So consider what's perhaps the cleverest advertising campaign of all time: "A diamond is forever." And I'm not referring to the James Bond movie staring Jill St. John!

Unless you purchase a diamond that's rare in size, cut and color, you'll probably never be able to sell it for what it cost you.

When you buy a diamond, you buy it at retail, and when you sell the diamond, you sell it wholesale — and the retail mark-up can be three to four times the dealer's cost.

In short, diamonds really are lousy investments. There's no active after-market for them as there is for coins, homes, stamps or cars. Meanwhile, it's estimated that the public (in North America, Japan, Europe, Asia, the Middle East, etc.) owns about 600 million carats of gem-quality diamonds. So if just 20 percent of these folks needed to sell their stones, the market price would collapse.

But again, DeBeers is brilliant in its marketing. The diamond industry spends millions of advertising dollars declaring diamonds to be "heirloom properties" that should be passed down from generation to generation. This has kept prices artificially high.

Therefore, I've come to the conclusion that the only reason a 5-carat, nearly flawless diamond is "a wonder to look at" is the realization of how much some silly fool is willing to pay for it. I will prove this point. Give the jeweler a deposit to hold the stone for a few hours, and tell him you'd like to personally show it to your fiance in a private venue. Instead, take this 5-carat stone to any well-known jeweler in Chicago and ask him what he will pay you for the diamond. You might take a cardiologist friend with you just in case.

Rather than spend that kind of money on billions of tetrahedral, bonded carbon atoms that are basically useless, I suggest that you take your $58,000 and use it as a down payment on a home or a condominium. There are some bargains in the Chicago area, and they may even increase in value over the next decade. If you already own a home, then purchase a vacation home in Florida. Failing that, give her a $58,000 portfolio of growth and income issues.

Please address your financial questions to Malcolm Berko, P.O. Box 8303, Largo, FL 33775, or email him at mjberko@yahoo.com. To find out more about Malcolm Berko and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.