creators home
creators.com lifestyle web

Recently

What's Best for Mom in a Mom-and-Pop Business? Q: My wife and I are in our 30s. We're partners in a business that nets us about $80,000 per year. What's the best way to report our income on our tax returns to maximize our Social Security benefits? A: Even though you're asking about your future …Read more. Bleeding Hearts and Bootstraps Q: I was surprised by the woman who wrote to you and said that people living on a small amount of Social Security were just lazy. Let me share my story to help this callous woman understand why people like me don't get very much from Social Security.…Read more. Don't Base Critical Decisions on Prophets of Doom Q: I'm about to turn 66. I want to put off starting my Social Security until age 70 because if I do, I'll get an extra $600 or so per month in a delayed retirement bonus added to by Social Security checks. But my husband said I should take my Social …Read more. Geezers and Floozies Q: I'm part of a group of old geezers who gets together every week at the local coffee place. Social Security is a frequent topic of conversation. At our last meeting, the subject of benefits for divorcees came up. One of our geezers was married to …Read more.
more articles

Another Man Suffers From 'Maximum' Benefit Envy

Share Comment

Q: I am 74 years old and have been getting Social Security for almost 10 years. When I worked, I always paid the maximum Social Security tax, but I'm not getting the maximum Social Security benefit. My wife says I shouldn't worry about it, but this has always bothered me. Shouldn't I be getting the maximum benefit?

A: I've been telling people for years not to get hung up on this "maximum" Social Security business. And now I'm telling you the same. I'll explain why in a minute.

But first, this interesting sidelight: During my 32-year career with the Social Security Administration, I probably had 5,000 people ask me about the "maximum" Social Security benefit, and exactly 5,000 of those folks were men. I'll let Freudian psychiatrists analyze that one!

So why do I tell guys not to get hung up about the maximum Social Security benefit? Because there really is no "maximum" Social Security benefit!

Having said that, some of you might wonder why the Social Security Administration announces the "maximum" Social Security retirement benefit every year. For example, in 2009, the so-called maximum benefit was listed as $2,323. But if you had read the small print when the government published this number, you'd have learned that $2,323 is the highest retirement benefit that can be paid to someone who was born in 1943 and will be retiring at age 66 in 2009.

A Social Security retirement benefit is based on a person's highest 35 years of earnings. Essentially, the higher your earnings over those 35 years, the higher your Social Security benefit will be. But because the law sets a maximum amount of earnings that can be taxed for Social Security purposes each year, there will obviously be a corresponding maximum retirement benefit that can be paid each year.

And because the maximum amount of earnings that can be taxed goes up each year, the so-called "maximum" Social Security benefit goes up each year.

Conversely, the older you are and the longer it has been since you retired, the lower your "maximum" benefit will be.

In other words, assuming as you said that you always paid the maximum Social Security tax every year until you retired, that means the retirement benefit you are getting is the highest rate that could be paid to someone who retired 10 years ago.

And here's another twist. If people continue working after they've reached their full retirement age and after they started collecting Social Security, their retirement benefit will be recomputed every year to give them credit for the extra Social Security taxes they are paying and the extra earnings they have added to their Social Security record.

So, for example, even though SSA says the current "maximum" Social Security benefit is $2,323, I know people who are getting retirement benefits close to $4,000 per month. These are high-earning people like doctors and lawyers who are in their 80s and still working and still paying Social Security taxes up to the maximum taxable earnings base. Because their benefits are adjusted every year for their extra earnings, they will continue to build up their Social Security retirement benefits to an unlimited amount.

That's why I said at the beginning of this column that there really is no "maximum" Social Security benefit.

But, if after everything I've written here, you are still worried that you are not getting the "maximum" Social Security benefit, you can contact someone at your local Social Security office and ask them to review your retirement benefit calculation.

And you might want to schedule an appointment with a psychiatrist!

To find out more about Tom Margenau and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2009 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.


Comments

3 Comments | Post Comment
Tom, I read your reply regarding maximun Social Security Benefits and after reading that you were also a Federal employee I knew I'd get a better answer to a question which has had me scratching my head for the past few years.
I retired from Federal Service in May 2009 folowing just under 30 years of service. I took regular retirement following a lenghty hospital stay. I had 12 years of non-government work prior to my entering government service with SS earnings exceeding the the SS earnings test each year. I understand I'm sunject to the WEP, but need to confirm that there is a limit to the amount my benefit can be reduced.
Thanks for any information you can orovide.
Bob Korsu
Comment: #1
Posted by: Bob Korsu
Sat Jan 30, 2010 10:28 AM
Tom. I am self employed and have as an employee my wife. I am a sub chapter S corp and pay about 1/2 of our real earnings as wages so as to avoid the self employment tax on the other 1/2. I have the luxery of choosing how much are my earnings and how much are my wifes. My wife is 60 and I am 54 so she is going to reach retirement age before me. I have been weighting the bulk of the pay to her (for about the last 5 years) for this reason. My question is how do I determine the optimal amount to pay as wages subjected to SS tax to my wife and myself keeping in mind the more I claim as wages the more I will have to withold each month. The total amount of earnings I have to work with is approx 100k each year. We are both in reasonably good health and I intend to work at least another 10 years in my current business. I could increase her earnings to around 80k and still pay myself enough to be eligible for my group health insurance policy. Are there social security experts that help with this kind of situation?

Thanks for your response
Steve

Eagle Colorado
04/17/11
Comment: #2
Posted by: Steve
Sun Apr 17, 2011 11:57 AM
My guess is a lot of people aren't commenting here because your post is pretty insensitive.

Because you are an insider to the system, I know it all seems so easy to understand...and, only people who need professional help would make such inquiries. But, the truth is, Social Security (and all Fed programs) are intimidating to people. The literature that is put out is virtually always incomplete, not contextual...and, certainly not geared to helping people understand. When I tried to help my mother understand what she should do as she was set to retire...it took her like 3 visits with representatives, and way too many Google searches for me to paint a picture of what the best options were for her.

I can't help but think you have piled on just a little more intimidation with your 'looking down your nose' approach to this issue. I think a person would naturally need to see a psychiatrist considering the awful way that the whole system is administered. -Case in point, why did 5,000 people (Men or Women) have to call (you alone...how many other SS employees had 5,000 poeple ask the same question) and ask such a simple question. Maybe men are more willing to be confrontational and actually demand an answer.

It's a shame you didn't work in the literature department so you could have made this all the more clear to everyone 25 or 30 years ago.

Just sayin
Comment: #3
Posted by: in sensitive
Wed Feb 1, 2012 5:44 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Tom Margenau
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month