creators.com opinion web
Conservative Opinion General Opinion
Susan Estrich
25 May 2012
The Next Education President

Mitt Romney is right about one thing: Too many American children do receive what he this week called a … Read More.

23 May 2012
Susan Mary Riley, We Will Miss You

It's her voice that I keep hearing in my head. "Susan," she would say, in that quiet, commanding … Read More.

18 May 2012
Boring

When my kids were young, about the worst thing they could say about something was that it was capital-b BORRRING.… Read More.

Welcome to the Show, Mr. Cain

Share Comment

Running for president looked easy, I would guess, to Herman Cain: 9-9-9, big smile, business know-how, straight talk.

As long as you're losing, it is easy. Who knew anything about Michele Bachmann until she won the Iowa caucus?

There is a fundamental rule in politics: The faster the air goes into the balloon the faster it comes out. Blame the press. They like nothing better than creating sensations and then destroying them. True enough. But it doesn't matter. The press isn't running for president.

Cain wasn't complaining when his numbers were rising. He wasn't complaining when his star was on the ascent, when the press was fawning over him, fighting for interviews he was only too happy to give. He wasn't complaining when all that attention was positive.

Did he really think it would stay that way? Did he think he could play big league baseball without anyone taking a closer look at him?

Since the allegations of sexual harassment started surfacing, Cain has done everything he could to avoid the attention he so recently welcomed. He tried saying no to all the questions, or to quote him, as hotel security tried to lead him through a hall packed with journalists, "What did I say? Excuse me. Excuse me! What part of 'no' don't people understand?"

The women he allegedly harassed might say the same thing. What part of "no" doesn't Cain understand?

He has tried to hide behind confidentiality agreements surrounding the settlement process. Not so fast. This is presidential politics. Confidentiality agreements don't work. There's that sneaky business of the public's right to know, not about your personal life, but about your professional conduct. To quote Haley Barbour, Mississippi governor and former chair of the Republican National Committee, "If you have a confidentiality agreement that keeps the public from finding out something that the public is interested in knowing the facts, you ought to go on and get the facts out."

Cain's latest gambit, as word of a third woman accuser surfaced, has been to blame the campaigns of his competitors.

First it was Rick Perry's campaign; then it was Mitt Romney's campaign; then it was the consultant who used to work for him. Sure, sometimes the best defense is a good offense, but in the case of a newcomer like Cain, it doesn't matter. Are his competitors trying to smear him? Who knows? But they don't need to. The press does the digging. And if it's the truth, it's the truth, not a smear.

This is, of course, not the first problem Cain has faced since he became the flavor of the month. There was his foot-in-mouth interview about abortion, during which he went on about how it was the woman's choice and then insisted that of course he was 100 percent against freedom of choice.

But my favorite is the ad by his chief of staff extolling Cain's virtues and then, as he finishes, taking a long puff on his cigarette. Yes, I know, President Obama used to smoke and struggled to quit. I used to smoke and struggled to quit. A lot of people have. But smoking a cigarette as part of a political ad? That isn't novel. It's nuts.

When was the last time you saw a television reporter take a drag at the end of a report? When was the last time you saw a politician pause during an interview to take a drag off his cigarette? It's not a matter of political correctness. Smoking kills, and putting it in your ads as if it's a fine choice — go ahead, kids, and light up — is morally questionable and politically stupid. I showed the ad to my students, and when it was over, they couldn't remember a single word the man said. What we all remembered, in shock, was the cigarette.

Herman Cain's numbers are about to start plummeting. He's in the spin cycle. After that, he gets hung out to dry until he becomes as irrelevant to this race as Michele Bachmann. In a way, it's too bad, because he really was the most entertaining candidate on the stage. My prediction is that when this is over, a career in television may well await him. He could certainly have his own show. But not the one he's in right now.

To find out more about Susan Estrich and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2011 CREATORS.COM


Comments

19 Comments | Post Comment
Dear Ms. Estrich,

I want the Liberals and so-called Women's Rights Groups to be just as diligent on Conservatives as they were on former Bill Clinton who actually did commit sexual harassment.

Get where I'm going?

Nuff Said...Dennis
Comment: #1
Posted by: Dennis
Fri Nov 4, 2011 12:55 AM
Allegations without sources and facts - typical for conservatives running for office. What ever happened (didn't happen) when BHO was running? We didn't even get allegations. We didn't even know his background. We still don't know.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Early
Fri Nov 4, 2011 5:24 AM
Ms Estrich, this is not your best work. Unspecified allegations from unknown sources, smoking, foot-in-mouth interviews? I have noticed that even the highest-minded of political commentators resort to personal attacks when it suits them. This nonsense is not why I look forward to your column each week.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Motley Wisdom
Fri Nov 4, 2011 6:28 AM
Re: Dennis

I'm not even justifiying Clinton's behavior, but was monica an unwilling participant? Is harrassment the correct word for what transpired there?
Comment: #4
Posted by: WildBill
Fri Nov 4, 2011 8:04 AM
Notice how the stories didn't come out until Cain's popularity rose to the stop and stayed there? Why didn't the accusers come forward months ago? This reeks of politics, nothing more. And the media ought to be condemned fully for plastering the airwaves with nothing while they ignored Edwards' affair and love child for months.
Comment: #5
Posted by: Lesley Barnard
Fri Nov 4, 2011 2:06 PM
Re: WildBill

Hi Wild Bill,

Granted Monica was a very willing and not too smart participant, however what makes it sexual harassment is the imbalance of power. Consider the CEO of a major corporation getting bj's from a low level employee.

Nuff Said...Dennis
Comment: #6
Posted by: Dennis
Fri Nov 4, 2011 2:31 PM
"Who knew anything about Michele Bachmann until she won the Iowa caucus?"

Last I heard, the Iowa caucus was scheduled for January, 2012.

Responsible journalism (including commentary) requires accuracy. Much like the Iowa caucus has not yet occurred, concrete allegations against Mr. Cain have not yet surfaced. Susan, I always enjoy reading your comments as they relate to facts, but this time you failed to wait for the facts. Your readers expect more from you.
Comment: #7
Posted by: Andrew Miller
Fri Nov 4, 2011 7:08 PM
Susan,

I think you're wrong on this one. I sense politics as you knew it has changed this go around. The smoking ad is a clever poke at political correctness, which is the standard now. and you don't have any idea how many in the Republican base are sick to death of it. The folks that are shocked by the cigarette aren't going to vote for Cain anyhow. The Sexual harassment charges, whether true or not, are not going to matter for the same reason the smoking ad won't hurt Cain. Of course I could be all wrong myself, however, I'm willing to bet that you will have to wake up and smell the new political coffee brewing!

Respectfully, Roy D. Keller
Comment: #8
Posted by: Roy D. Keller
Sat Nov 5, 2011 2:04 PM
Ms. Estrich.... Your article Welcome to the big show, Mr. Cain. points to Liberal double standard and bias. Who else but a liberal media commentator would scream at an "alleged" sexual harassment charge against Herman Cain. Yet when a liberal Clinton had lied about sexual escapades in the White House had it proven with DNA .... and a liberal Teddy Kennedy had thought more of his political career and the possibility of being accused of sexual indiscretions that he let a woman die. Your article is a liberal laugh .... my God woman where is your brain?
Comment: #9
Posted by: Marnie Sawa
Sat Nov 5, 2011 6:35 PM
Susan, are you serious? You were one of the few libs I cared for but your remarks here are preciously ignorant!
Comment: #10
Posted by: jim davis
Sun Nov 6, 2011 6:39 AM


A person who feigns some desirable or publicly approved attitude, especially one whose private life, opinions, or statements belie his or her public statements is a hypcrite. For once Estrich has dropped her false public persona, and has displayed for all to see, just what really lies behind the writings, to wit, a racist liberal attack dog/bitch bereft of honesty conscience or morals.

Comment: #11
Posted by: joseph wright
Sun Nov 6, 2011 9:52 AM
Susan? is this you? Or has someone hacked your account? I always enjoyed your balance, though I don't agree with your politics. I actually was looking forward to seeing your comments this week, knowing in my mind for sure that you would defend this man as there is nothing proven in these allegations.

Whoever has hacked Susan's blog, please return it to her so that she can post what she believes instead of this practical joke cloaked as a real blog!
Comment: #12
Posted by: HelloLarry
Sun Nov 6, 2011 1:01 PM
Saw Susan's commentary on Fox News just now...she cannot be more wrong. Cain by calling out on the bias media is dead on what this country is fed up with. What happen to the liberal bias that innocent until proven guilty? Because Cain chooses to step above the cesspool does not mean his campaign is unconventional. Let's stick to the issues...or should we have been asking Clinton these questions while campaigning? Cain is one of us Americans and not one of them (establishment and/or media).
Comment: #13
Posted by: Virginia
Sun Nov 6, 2011 2:48 PM
Your presumption of guilt is truly astonishing. Why would Cain confess all and apologize if he has nothing to
confess, and nothing to apologize for? "Sexual harrassment" is nothing but a racket. and has been a racket
from the day Anita Hill told her laughable tale about Justice Thomas. I applauded when I heard Mr Cain say
"Don't go there" to the reporter trying to introduce the "charges" into the post-debate press conference. How
dare he bring that up, after the deep discussion of actual issues that had just been presented by Cain and Gingrich
for the first time in this entire race. Sex should never substitute for substance in a Presidential race.
I spent 20 years as a journalist and as a woman working in a "mans' world" in the 50's and 60's, before the left
invented sexual harrassment. These claims are rarely true. And any woman who would accept hush money has
no integrity. She either did it for the money from the beginning, or has sold her integrity for cash.
Comment: #14
Posted by: Joan Hansen
Sun Nov 6, 2011 2:49 PM
Saw Susan's commentary on Fox News just now...she cannot be more wrong. Cain by calling out on the bias media is dead on what this country is fed up with. What happen to the liberal bias that innocent until proven guilty? Because Cain chooses to step above the cesspool does not mean his campaign is unconventional. Let's stick to the issues...or should we have been asking Clinton these questions while campaigning? Cain is one of us Americans and not one of them (establishment and/or media).
Comment: #15
Posted by: Virginia
Sun Nov 6, 2011 2:51 PM
Susan, you are one the few lefties I thought was sensible. You ruined your credibility with this article. No trial, no testimony, what happened to innocent until proven guilty. Shame on you. You need to apologize to those of us who enjoyed reading your columns. Think again.
Comment: #16
Posted by: Marc Scheel
Mon Nov 7, 2011 10:27 AM
Is this journalism, or is it a diary entry?
Comment: #17
Posted by: Ron Pavellas
Tue Nov 8, 2011 5:30 AM
Susan,
Your seem to have Mr. Cain figured out. Perhaps you might give some thoughts to President Obama. I would really like to know what a smart person like you really thinks of the guy. I recently changed my voting to No Party because of my disgust. Feed them all to the grinders of the so called elite media and the pajama bloggers, I'll pick from what's left, no right, no center, awh the hell with it!
Comment: #18
Posted by: Harold
Tue Nov 8, 2011 2:38 PM
Who's paying for the $200/hr lawyers representing these women?
Comment: #19
Posted by: Early
Wed Nov 9, 2011 5:02 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Susan Estrich
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Tom Rosshirt
Tom RosshirtUpdated 26 May 2012
David Sirota
David SirotaUpdated 25 May 2012

15 Oct 2008 Say Goodnight, Jesse

20 Feb 2008 What's in a Word?

6 Aug 2008 Is Anyone Ready?