creators.com opinion web
Conservative Opinion General Opinion
Susan Estrich
8 Oct 2014
Stomachaches

I've had stomachaches for as long as I can remember. As a kid, I called it an "uncomfortable feeling." As an adult,… Read More.

3 Oct 2014
The President's Security

When you hear Rep. Darrell Issa, one of the president's harshest Republican critics in the House, demanding … Read More.

1 Oct 2014
Helen

Today would be my mother's 88th birthday, which is not so old, but my mother seemed very old eight years ago, … Read More.

Two Hundred Years For Kiddie Porn

Comment

Lots of people who know about such things have been waiting to see what the Supreme Court would do about the case of Morton Berger. Mr. Berger was sentenced to 200 years in prison, with no possibility of probation or early release, for possessing 20 pornographic images of children.

I'm not defending kiddie porn or pornographers, thank you, Bill O'Reilly, but we're not dealing with the person who made the pornography or even sold it. We're dealing with a viewer who got caught by the use of his credit card number on a Texas website.

Ten years is the minimum sentence in Arizona for any crime involving "sexual exploitation of a minor," and the rule is that sentences for multiple counts must be served consecutively. So the sentence for 20 counts automatically becomes 200 years.

Mr. Berger's lawyers argued in the papers filed with the Court that had their client been prosecuted in federal court, as he could have been, for possessing the same images, the sentence would have been five years, as it would have been in most of the states — most having no prohibition on early release or good-time credits. Arizona's law, as applied to the facts of this case, produces the harshest sentence in the country, according to the dissent in the Arizona Supreme Court. That court upheld Mr. Berger's sentence in an opinion that focused on the legality of the 10-year minimum term, standing alone, rather than the accumulated impact of 20 of them, served consecutively.

The petition to the Supreme Court focused on the total term. Surely a differential of 195 years between what the feds think the conduct is "worth" and what Arizona thinks might suggest that the Arizona scheme is fundamentally out of whack, which is essentially what's required for a conclusion that a punishment is "cruel and unusual' within the Constitution's prohibition of such treatment.

It's easy to understand legislators voting for a law setting tough minimum sentences for those who are in any way involved in "sexual exploitation of a minor," including those who pay to view it. After all, it's just such demand that creates the market for the product.

And who wants to be the one to argue for different levels of criminality for the viewer, the purveyor and the manufacturer, when doing so may lead to the label of being "soft" on crime, especially kiddie porn, a label that requires no further explanation, and invites none, from voters? When it comes to crime, and this kind of crime in particular, the conventional wisdom, at least for those seeking office, is that you can't be too tough.

The problem is that when you apply the results to real cases, especially when rules combine to multiply mandatory minimum sentences, as they do here, you can be too tough. The justices of the Supreme Court have been increasingly willing to examine the extent to which judges have been denied the ability to judge due to federal sentencing guidelines that have limited their discretion to individualize sentences. The tendency of such laws to shift rather than limit discretion, effectively increasing the power of the prosecutor to set sentences by deciding what to charge, comes at the expense of the person who is most likely the oldest and smartest in the room, and the one chosen for that function. This shift is increasingly well-recognized.

But the Court has been much less willing to look at the sentences themselves, lest they be required to start drawing lines for which there is no particular basis. If not 200 years, then what? A hundred? Fifty? Twenty? Short of death, what is too much, and how do you define it, given that there is no necessarily "right" answer to the question of what constitutes just punishment?

Interestingly enough, no similar reluctance affects the Court when confronted with corporate punishment viewed as unduly harsh. As Ohio State University law professor Doug Berman has pointed out, both in his blog and in press interviews, this Court has repeatedly shown its willingness to limit "extreme corporate punishment" by reducing or throwing out excessive punitive damage awards, most recently vacating an order against Phillip Morris just last week. But "extreme individual punishment" by the criminal justice system has produced no similar solicitude.

Unfortunately for Mr. Berman, that didn't change this week. The Court turned down his petition for review. The 57-year-old former high-school teacher will die in prison for the images he bought online.

To find out more about Susan Estrich and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2007 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.



Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment
Susan, Wanted to thank you for the fair treatment you gave this topic ...perhaps you should have gone further because this instant case may be about Mr. Berger's overly harsh treatment in Arizona but the bigger picture is that child abuse/Child Porn as become the crimen exceptum of our generation. The crimen exceptum is central to every inquisition, whether it be heresy, witchcraft, being a Jew, a Red under the bed or today one accused of child sex abuse or accessing child pornography. The crimen exceptum requires the suspension of due process and all real processes of justice. You do not need to be tried and convicted, merely accused.

Today's crimen exceptum of either child sex abuse or accessing child pornography are the most potent of any ever possessed by a phase of the inquisition, which is why the current inquisition is so deadly. The crimen exceptum is already expanding into more general pornography, but here we deal with sex abuse and child pornography, the second the most powerful of the two. As the population comes under more control in the totalitarian state, as in America, the crimen exceptum of inappropriate sex may change to dissent/enemy of the state (heresy).
While today's crimen exceptum of either child sex abuse or accessing child pornography is the most potent of any ever possessed by a phase of the inquisition, that the protection of children should form the basis of a moral panic is far from new. We see the censor and policeman and prosecutor here, together with the clever individuals who try to outwit them on the Internet through encryption and other sophisticated schemes. We see the hypocrisy and disingenuousness of the former and the growing interest in taboos and forbidden thrills of the latter.

A good question to ask at the very beginning of an investigation into child pornography is why it is considered to be almost criminal, if not so, to question either its extent or the actual extent of any harm it might be causing to children. That such a conversation is taboo should speak volumes.
Anyone affected by the issue of child pornography, especially one accused of accessing it, should be aware that the recent major police campaigns of Landslide, Ore, Amethyst and others are collapsing due to police corruption.

One also needs to be aware that the police control virtually all of the child porn images available over the Internet and use them either in legal entrapment or illegal activities, so if you see an advertisement for child porn it is almost certain to be a police trap or corrupt scam.
Susan there are more people in prison today because of this child porn hysteria than there have ever children actually involved in child porn. This is the ultimate crimen exceptum because no one dares to stop and say enough is enough ...Morton berger was an award winning teacher , a great father oto his own children ...a good husband ...he downloaded some pictures from a website with child porn that was owned and operated by the US Government...do we now have enough real criminals without our own government going out and appealling to some peoples human weaknesses and turning otherwise good prioductive people into the next generation of criminals?? Morton Berger never did anything to anyone ...he never sold or disseminated CP ...our Govt did shame on Mr. Berger for doing it and shame shame on our givt for using this issue to entrap 1000's of otherwise good decent people. the happenings described in Geroge orwells 1984 may not have been all present in 1984 but reread the book today and you will find that they have all come to pass today...THis isn't about saving children its about controlling everyone else ...no one with a computer and internet access is safe from this inquisition ..corrupt police, your own childrens usage, or their friends usage , trojans, mis clicking onn te wrong link all of these things could make any of us the next Morton Berger ...don't think for a second it can't ...he wasn't just unlucky ..he was set up and if anyone thinks they are immune to being the next 200 yr die in prison for what goes on inside of your imagination ...then think again
Comment: #1
Posted by: Rogerisright
Sun Jun 1, 2008 5:34 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Susan Estrich
Oct. `14
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
28 29 30 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31 1
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 3 Nov 2014
Mark Shields
Mark ShieldsUpdated 1 Nov 2014
Joe Conason
Joe ConasonUpdated 1 Nov 2014

29 Jun 2012 Supreme Politics

31 Oct 2012 The October Surprise

21 Aug 2013 Looking Evil in the Eye