creators.com opinion web
Conservative Opinion General Opinion
Susan Estrich
10 Feb 2012
What Happened to Newt and Mitt?

Newt's easy. While all of us on the Democratic side were playing "root for Newt," Republicans were … Read More.

8 Feb 2012
Chasing Equality

Tuesday's ruling by a panel of three judges of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit … Read More.

3 Feb 2012
Primary Purposes

If the goal of the primary process is simply to nominate a candidate, essentially to nominate the man or … Read More.

The San Francisco Democrat

Share Comment

You've got to hand it to Nancy Pelosi. Love her or hate her — and there are probably more people in the second category than the first — you can't deny the enormity of her accomplishment. She did something very, very big. She cut a tough deal at the last minute to do it, and she absolutely was the right person to be cutting that deal. I don't like the fact that the health care bill does its best to negate a woman's right to choose, but if Pelosi tells me that's what it took to get the votes, I believe her.

None of that will necessarily make her any more popular with most Americans this week than she was last week. You can be sure Republicans are looking with greater relish at running against her than against President Obama.

And that's after some real improvement in Pelosi's ratings. A few months ago, her disapproval rating was hovering around 62 percent, according to Rasmussen Reports. A majority still doesn't like her. But then, a majority, according to Rasmussen, doesn't like health care reform, either. Far from undercutting her achievement, these numbers underscore it. She got it through anyway.

I was thinking about what it would be like if, say, a rich, handsome, photogenic man from Silicon Valley was speaker of the House and had pushed health care through. I think he would be a very big deal. In a very different way from Nancy Pelosi.

I have been conducting my own informal survey to find out why people don't like Pelosi and, more particularly, what it is they don't like about her. My focus has been on people who agree with her, many of whom — particularly men — cringe visibly when you ask them about her.

You hear the word "phony" a lot, but that's not really true. Pelosi is authentically just what she is, which is to say one of those women my mother spent her life being jealous of, comfortable in her Armani, secure in her good looks, unashamed of the obvious time and attention she puts into them, a girl who had the right kind of father (rich and powerful) and the right kind of husband (rich and supportive) and always fit in.

You know she was popular in high school. She is also tough, smart and determined, which doesn't make it better. I always found it easier to take when girls like that were dumb.

If you suggest to people that it's sexism that keeps Pelosi from earning the approval she deserves, most right-minded men, not to mention women, will immediately start telling you how much they like Sen. Dianne Feinstein, who is also from San Francisco and rich and powerful and very well-dressed. It's true. Sexism today rarely takes the form of excluding all women.

But there's a narrow window of acceptability, much narrower than for men. Feinstein's public persona has been shaped by tragedy. She became mayor of San Francisco in a hail of bullets. She has a very dignified, almost upper-crust bearing. She is not in your face. I don't think she would want to wrangle the House of Representatives into passing health care.

There's also the problem that many people — including many men and more women than we'd like to admit — don't cotton to taking orders from a woman, particularly a pushy one. And what successful woman over 40 is not pushy?

It still amazes me how many young people tell me openly that they've had horrible experiences working for women and prefer not to. Too often the stories are pretty bad. Embarrassing. A bitter older woman punishing a younger one. On and on. The next generation was supposed to change all this, not have it reinforced.

None of that is going to change because of Pelosi. But the one thing I didn't hear from anyone, even the people who both hate and disagree with her, is that she doesn't know what she's doing. If you think what she does is easy, look around the world. This woman is good at her job, at one of the toughest jobs there is. That speaks well for all of us.

To find out more about Susan Estrich and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2009 CREATORS.COM


Comments

11 Comments | Post Comment
Nancy Pelosi has no ears. She refuses to hear what people are saying. She knows best and it's going to be her way; she forgets she works FOR the people. I have no problem with strong women in power: I have a problem with people who abuse that power, man or woman. The representative from Louisiana said he voted his conscience after being wined and dined by the White House and House leadership and was given "assurances" for debt forgiveness. Money for new projects suddenly appeared in certain districts.
Conscience doesn't have to have a sweetened pot to kick in. Next we'll see if the Senate consciences are for sale.
Comment: #1
Posted by: jbaugher
Wed Nov 11, 2009 6:12 AM
It's very obvious why most people don't like Her Heiness Pelosi - quite simply, she's a horse's ass!
Comment: #2
Posted by: Early
Wed Nov 11, 2009 8:15 AM
Susan Estrich is one of those public figures I really, really disagree with, and yet really, really like.
This health care bill is not connected in any way to improving health care.
How could it be? I do not recall a single PUBLIC fact-finding hearing in either house of congress. They never publicly discussed for example, just where the greatest increases in health care cost are occurring or why.
How can the Dems pretend to be solving heath care problem, if they spent no time defining the problem in an intellectually honest way.
There was no congressional health care fact-finding, because congress was not interested on any level in establishing any facts.
What the Dema have done is hold secret meetings where they have divided the graft that will result from breaking up the current health care system.
People forget that our health care system is the best in the world. They forget that the health care system is also an industry - an industry that employs lost of "little people."
How many people have risen out of poverty or the economic lower middle class by becoming RNs, medical practice managers, health insurance sales reps, etc.?
How many people are going to lose their jobs over this graft bill? How many people are going to lose their way out of povery when the Dems suck all the money out of the health care system? How many people are going to die unnecessarily when we have "Department of Motor Vehicles" health care?
The Dems are intent on crashing the health care industry just like they crashed the auto industry.
The willful, mean spirited destruction of our current health care system is hard to watch.
Once the Dems destroy the JOB CREATING health care industry as we know it, its gone forever. Just like GM factories all across the US.
You can comfort yourself with the fact that the Dem bills all retain he rights of trial lawyers to get rich off the rest of us.
Watching the Dems is like watching a real life "Gordon Gehcho" from the movie "Wall Street."
The Dems are breaking up the US, institution by institution and getting rich selling off the parts.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Ed
Wed Nov 11, 2009 9:36 AM
Susan, Do you read these e-mails? I do not care for Nancy Pelosi's policies, not the fact that she is a woman. If she was a conservative, I would support her and her policies. But I cannot go along with her when the majority of America does not want this healthcare shoved down our throat. I admire her for being where she is today, but I do not see how she is such a radical that she thinks the minority of people have the right to change 1/6 of the American economy. It is all about paying back the unions, and that I cannot abide!!
Comment: #4
Posted by: Anne
Wed Nov 11, 2009 10:22 AM
Susan,
Until now I have read your column by clicking on the link at the Drudge report. I hope you will understand what I am trying to say. You are the only columnist who might get it. I have owned several small restaurants over the last 30 years. Some I have started with an emply building and began from scratch. I always paid my CPA for a monthly P&L statement. When you first start it is hard to make a profit. Your P&L is in the red. Month by month you use these accounting tools to cut costs and streamline your business. Hard work must include wisdom. The month you first break even is a celebration. Later on you get profits. You pay your employees every pay peroid. Sometimes you walk around with your own paycheck in your pocket for several days waiting to get enough money in the bank to pay yourself. Unemployment, matching social security, and worker's compensation insurance is not withheld from an employees paycheck but comes straight out of profits.
All major manufacturing that can be moved out of the USA is already gone. Most small businesses make lower than 10% profits, usually around 6%.
No one in the House or the Senate understands this. They all went to mostly private schools, college, law school, and then to Washington. They have never read a monthly P&L statement. They have never met a payroll. They can read the annual report on the stock that grandaddy left them. They recieve dividend checks once a quarter or more often, and have never had a poor man's money problems. They will not be under the healthcare program that they are now putting the rest of us under. They cannot understand what our problem is and they are about to put a vast majoritiy of us permanently out of business. When we are gone we will not try it again. We will not hire or run the risks or borrow the money again. I/We think that is what they want.
I hope you get this. This is what all the yelling is about. Thanks for your ear. Doug Heath
Comment: #5
Posted by: Doug heath
Wed Nov 11, 2009 11:58 AM
I am not a fan of Nancy Pelosi or any advocate of state-regulated socialism and corporatism. I consider those people to be stupid because state regulated socialism and corporatism are proven to be more inefficient and less moral than transparent market-based systems.
However, if your value system says that "equality of financial outcome" is the most important value -- against many other values like freedom, economic justice, liberty, responsibility, and accountability -- then I can see why you would move in that direction. I think her value system is immoral and un-American.
Comment: #6
Posted by: scott365
Wed Nov 11, 2009 12:29 PM
One more thing...

When I see an article accusing everyone (well men at least) with disagreeing or disliking Sarah Palin for the sole reason that she is a woman I will take these types of articles more seriously. As it is, I view them as simply a "poisonimng the well" type of sophistry to shield leftists from completely legitimate criticism.
Comment: #7
Posted by: scott365
Wed Nov 11, 2009 12:37 PM
Why do I not like Nancy Pelosi: let me count the ways! For the purpose of your survey, I am a conservative male. I also separate the political person from the person. Just as I admire Obama for his personal story, I also think he is a great husband and father. I hate his politics, not him. I think Bill Clinton did a good job as President, but I hate what he did to his wife and family, and dislike him personally. What I hate about Nancy Pelosi is her politics. She is taking her extreme left wing views and using her position to shove them down the throats of the 80% of the people that disagree with her. In a recent poll, only 20% of the people consider themselves as liberal. Nancy is far left of most of them. Nancy is a highly skilled politician delivering an insane agenda. Hopefully there is some sanity in the Senate. Do not worry about your freedom of choice agenda, you will not recognize the health care bill when it leaves the Senate....if it ever leaves the Senate. The closer you get to November, 2010, the harder it will be to get anything this massive out of the Senate. We can hope, but hope is not a plan. We can tell our Senators and Congressmen and Congresswomen what this bill will do to their job security, or lack there of.
Comment: #8
Posted by: red5mutual
Wed Nov 11, 2009 1:05 PM
Tin-eared, clueless, dismissive of the concerns of the non-elites.
Pelosi is another Michael Dukakis-- except far less likable.
Comment: #9
Posted by: Central Virginia
Thu Nov 12, 2009 6:56 AM
One day I hope to visit the planet you live on! lmao!!
Comment: #10
Posted by: bill s
Thu Nov 12, 2009 8:13 AM
I decided to post to let Susan know that I really, really enjoy her commentary. I always pay particular attention to her when she is a guest analyst on TV. I am fiscally very conservative and socially moderate-- so we don't agree on much; however, I feel like I can, at least, understand "the other side's" perspective through her analysis. Susan never seems to spin or name-call. She calls it like she sees it.
Susan- your students are lucky to have you. You must be a fabulous instructor.
Comment: #11
Posted by: LC
Tue Nov 17, 2009 9:04 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Susan Estrich
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 13 Feb 2012
Joe Conason
Joe ConasonUpdated 11 Feb 2012
Mark Shields
Mark ShieldsUpdated 11 Feb 2012

5 Dec 2008 Where is John Edwards?

23 Jan 2009 Caroline's Exit

30 Nov 2011 The Campaign Against Romney