creators.com opinion web
Conservative Opinion General Opinion
Susan Estrich
25 May 2012
The Next Education President

Mitt Romney is right about one thing: Too many American children do receive what he this week called a … Read More.

23 May 2012
Susan Mary Riley, We Will Miss You

It's her voice that I keep hearing in my head. "Susan," she would say, in that quiet, commanding … Read More.

18 May 2012
Boring

When my kids were young, about the worst thing they could say about something was that it was capital-b BORRRING.… Read More.

The Other Forty Percent

Share Comment

Everyone knows what the "right" answer is to the question of whether you would be willing to vote for an African-American for president. The "right" answer is yes. What's surprising is not how many people say yes, but how many don't. According to a Rasmussen Reports poll taken last week, 78 percent of all Americans said yes to that question, leaving 22 percent admitting either that they would not be willing to vote for an African-American (11 percent) or aren't sure (the other 11 percent).

Of course, since everyone knows what the "right" answer is, if you really want to know how much race matters, you don't ask people what they'd be willing to do; you ask them about their family, friends and co-workers. The question is not whether you are what most of us would consider to be a racist, but whether other people you know are. Easier to admit that way. And that's when you get the most disturbing finding of the recent Rasmussen poll.

Knowing that you're supposed to say yes, knowing that political correctness, not to mention evenhandedness and fairness, counsel that the answer to your willingness to vote for an African-American is supposed to be "yes," 17 percent of white voters say that their family, friends and co-workers would not vote for an African-American and 26 percent more just aren't sure. Not sure if your best friends are racist? Nice. That totals up to more than 40 percent — more than four in 10.

If four in 10 white Americans are willing to admit to a pollster that their friends, family and co-workers might not vote for an African-American because of his race, how many really hold that view? More.

Now maybe, given the current political situation, when people hear the question, they believe it really means: Are you willing to vote for Barack Obama? Maybe all those people saying "no" or "not sure" would be giving a different answer if the Republican Party were about to nominate Colin Powell. Maybe some of this is about Obama, and not about race per se.

Or maybe not. In any event, it doesn't matter. Obama is the one who's running, and to anyone who thinks racism is part of our history and not our current reality, look again.

Right now, Obama is running well behind the generic Democrat, and McCain is running well ahead of the generic Republican.

That means when people are asked about supporting Democrats for Congress, the generic Democrat for Congress does as well as 15 points better than the real-life Democratic candidate for president. It means McCain does better than the Republican brand, maybe because people like him more than they do Republicans generally, or maybe because they like Obama less than they do Democrats generally. Either way, it spells a major challenge.

There is a long tradition of people lying to pollsters about their support for African-American candidates. Remember California Gov. Tom Bradley? Not. He was way ahead in every poll, right up to and including election day. The only one he lost was the secret ballot that actually counted. We saw the same phenomenon in a number of pre-primary and exit polls in big states this year, where Obama was supposed to be closing the gap, or even taking the lead, and then lost in the actual balloting to Hillary Clinton by comfortable margins. It got to the point that I started ignoring the warning lights on the Drudge Report on primary Tuesdays at 5 p.m., showing contests that Hillary ended up winning comfortably to be too close to call. They weren't. People were just lying.

Obama is who he is. He can run a campaign that transcends race; he can reach out to white voters; he can keep away from his former pastor and his former church. But he can't change his race and he shouldn't try. Nor can he change, in a mere five months, racial prejudices that are so deeply ingrained that four in 10 white voters aren't even embarrassed enough to lie about them. Still, no candidate wants to be in the position where you have to win the votes of every person — or even five out of six of them — who might consider voting for you. That's too little room for disagreement. It's why high negatives are such a problem.

At the end of the day, for better and for worse, what most voters care about is themselves, their own lives and their families. Obama's challenge is not to convince them to change their minds about race, or racism, but to put themselves first. With the price of gas approaching five dollars, unemployment at record highs, the war dragging on and the housing market slumping, taking race into account might just be a luxury that less well-off Americans, who are the ones most likely to do it, simply can't afford.

To find out more about Susan Estrich and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.


Comments

7 Comments | Post Comment

Now that we have jumped over the "RACE" issue, that is not the only issue. After you have considered race, you MUST consider CHARACTER, EXPERIENCE, Positions on major issues such as ECONOMY, JOB CREATION, TAX FAIRNESS, ETHICAL HISTORY, LIFE HISTORY. SADLY, Barack Obama comes up woefully short on most of these issues. His landslide loss in the upcoming election will not be because of his race, it will be a result of his problems with the OTHER issues. The pundits are afraid to mention how quickly Barack Obama's stock plummeted after the Rev. Wright and William Ayers associations surfaced. AND NOW the Conviction and jailing of Tony Rezko, the man who gave Obama a sweetheart deal ala Rep. Randy Cunningham, on his Chicago mansion and property????? The public isn't buying this man anymore. And five more months of scrutiny will not help him as the vetting continues.
You cannot write off states like Kentucky, West Virginia, Ohio, Pennsylvania and expect to win. Obama lost 60 of 67 counties in Pennsylvania to Hillary, He will lose at least that many counties again against McCain. The Democrats have shot themselves in the foot with this nomination.
Comment: #1
Posted by: robert lipka
Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:44 AM

Things in the country are a mess. The Republicans control the White House. Let's kick them out and put in Democrats. The Democrats control Congress. Let's kick them out and put in Republicans. Fair enough?
Comment: #2
Posted by: Tom Camp
Wed Jun 11, 2008 6:55 AM
Every time I access the column through Drudgereport I get downloads to my computer. I have to stop reading the column
Comment: #3
Posted by: Carl Nyquist
Wed Jun 11, 2008 8:17 AM
I will not vote for Obama because he is a giant LIBERAL not because he is black. I'd vote for Condoleeza Rice or J C Watts..because I like their politics
Comment: #4
Posted by: Steven
Wed Jun 11, 2008 6:15 PM
This presidental race is not about race Susan and now you are putting it out again. Character and experience along with who will keep me safe are issues I am interested in. Don't bring gas into the picture for you can thank your democratic senate for this. We need to drill in this country for our safety as well. Russia is self sufficient in oil and if the arabs choose to cut off our supply it will shut down this country along with our military. Look how it is controlling our economy now. They have control over us. WAKE UP
Comment: #5
Posted by: Kathaleen McCausland
Thu Jun 12, 2008 10:03 AM
The people Susan refers to are white poor people. Who's the racist? It is the Dems & Libs that are the rich and powerful in America. It is also the Dems and Libs that are the reason we have high gas prices. They are the cause of blacks & whites and other poor people to have single parent house holds. The 40' & 50's were when blacks & minorities were making strides ahead, in the late 60's and since they have declined. It is always the un-intended consequences of people like Susan and her party, that some how know better than us, what is good for them. Bill Clinton's theme was also "Change". I guess that meant from standing on your own to feet to kneeling on them. She even believes in Global Warming. I'm sure she believed in Global Cooling to in the 70's. How is it that Barrack Obama can do what he says when he's never done it himself? I wonder why it is that Dems and Libs think that the rest of the world should like us. If it wasn't for us, there would be no them. One more thing, how many terrorists attacks were made during the Clinton years and how many during the G.Bush years? Why, I think even a Dem or Lib can count that number. If Americas so bad leave it, there are plenty of other countries, well wait, no, none of them have a Free Speech amendment like we do. Get a life, get a clue, get me a beer would ya!
Comment: #6
Posted by: Henry Smith
Thu Jun 12, 2008 10:46 PM
Based on the results of Democratic primaries, it is reasonable to assume that 90% of African Americans plan to vote for Barack Obama in November. This means that only 10% of African Americans are willing to vote for a candidate that belongs to a different race. Susan notes that 60% of white Americans are willing to vote for an African American candidate. This indicates that white Americans are six times more likely than their African American colleagues
to vote for a candidate who belongs to a different race then their own. But somehow Ms. Estrich interprets these statistics as evidence that white Americans harbor residual racist tendencies?? Oh -- now I get it. She's a liberal Democrat!
Comment: #7
Posted by: alankorn
Fri Jun 13, 2008 6:38 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Susan Estrich
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Tom Rosshirt
Tom RosshirtUpdated 26 May 2012
David Sirota
David SirotaUpdated 25 May 2012

26 Sep 2007 Tolerance

31 Oct 2008 The Final Days

9 May 2012 Saturday Night with Bea