creators.com opinion web
Conservative Opinion General Opinion
Susan Estrich
25 May 2012
The Next Education President

Mitt Romney is right about one thing: Too many American children do receive what he this week called a … Read More.

23 May 2012
Susan Mary Riley, We Will Miss You

It's her voice that I keep hearing in my head. "Susan," she would say, in that quiet, commanding … Read More.

18 May 2012
Boring

When my kids were young, about the worst thing they could say about something was that it was capital-b BORRRING.… Read More.

The Opportunity in Afghanistan

Share Comment

During the most difficult days of the Mondale-Ferraro campaign in 1984, someone printed up a button that said: "There are no problems. Only opportunities."

By that definition, President Obama has one heck of an opportunity right now with respect to the war in Afghanistan.

There is no easy answer to what to do when the general running the war and his senior staff are quoted — apparently accurately — attacking everyone on the president's team except Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton. Gen. Stanley McChrystal has said that doing the Rolling Stone interview was a mistake of judgment. The president, understandably livid, has called McChrystal to Washington either to be scolded or fired. It hardly matters which.

The general will, of course, stand there and eat crow. He will profess his confidence in the president and apologize for his mistake. He might even claim that his quotes were taken out of context or did not fully reflect his views — or some other Washington-speak that comes short of accusing the reporter of lying (because doing that would only prompt another round of stories proving that the quotes were accurate, and then some). The truth is, it doesn't matter what the general says now because no one will believe him.

The president can either accept the apology or fire the general or, most likely, both. If he doesn't fire him, he looks like the "wimp," which was the point of the story. If he does, he risks worsening his relations with the military and being blamed for everything that goes wrong from now on in a war in which more seems to go wrong than right.

Since this is the war he ran on, the supposedly good war (as opposed to Iraq), and since he has been in office going on two years, blaming Bush and his team just won't cut it.

Military officials complaining about their civilian bosses is not exactly something new in the history of war. Read any history of any war and you're likely to find criticism that makes the current back and forth seem almost polite. My guess is that there were plenty of complaints about George W. Bush. Ditto for Bill Clinton. Civilian control doesn't mean the military thinks the civilians know better.

The bottom line is that the generals got what they wanted from the administration, and it still isn't going well. Victory has a thousand fathers. America's longest war is, at least for now, pretty much an orphan. I wouldn't presume to suggest the solution to that problem: If the general doesn't have one and his senior command hasn't come up with one, far be it from me.

But the president's political problem is another matter. He needs to convince the country that he is in charge, in command, up to his job — whether it is dealing with the spill in the Gulf, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan or the unemployment crisis almost everywhere. He needs to be honest, forceful and decisive — not partisan or political. He needs to be bigger than his opponents — not dwarfed by them.

In the old parlance, he has a real opportunity. And his presidency may ultimately be judged by how he uses it.

To find out more about Susan Estrich and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM


Comments

4 Comments | Post Comment
Susan writes, "But the president's political problem is another matter. He needs to convince the country that he is in charge, in command, up to his job — whether it is dealing with the spill in the Gulf, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan or the unemployment crisis almost everywhere. He needs to be honest, forceful and decisive — not partisan or political. He needs to be bigger than his opponents — not dwarfed by them."&&&&&&&&
The truth is, it doesn't matter what Obama says now because no one will believe him.

Comment: #1
Posted by: David Henricks
Wed Jun 23, 2010 1:14 AM
Susan, What our President needs to do is become the Commander in Chief of this wonderful country and step away from his radicals influences. I feel the General did this for a reason and it was effective. Would the General gets this attention if the article was not by Rollingstone? The General said he would die for his soldiers and I believe he would risk his career for them too. I have a son in the Army and what message does all this send to the troops who choose to fight for our country? The message is the President does not have a clue nor does he care. Do an article on George Soro's influence on the gulf and how Soros has stock in the Petrobras oil off of Braziil. Did you know they want our oil rigs while they stand idle. HMMM. Obama owes Soros big time and has sent 2 billion dollars to Petrobras for what? Repeal the Jones act!!! We would not be in this mess if the President did but could not due to union pressure. It is not about the President's color just his inexperience and the radicals that he surrounds himself with. Bill Ayers and Beverly Dohrn have waited for this President for 30 + years to push their agenda of destroying America or as they would put it Amerika. I remember them well.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Kathaleen
Wed Jun 23, 2010 8:58 AM
Yes I too remember Bernadette Dohrn. She would be on late-1960's tv screeching that hateful mouth of hers like a female version of Charlie Manson. She's either one of the most dangerous people in America or sleeping with them. Then and now. I can assure you, having been around over-educated white trash before, I know what neighborhood I blundered into when her type is in it. These are the kind of people who would take every dime you have and kill your children and have the paperwork justifying the murder beforehand as a justifiable reassignment. You do not want to be in Ayers/Dohrn's neighborhood. They always have the law's blessing. Be advised.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Edster
Wed Jun 23, 2010 11:41 AM
Obama chose this guy, spoke to him for 10 minutes, then didn't speak to him again for what, 70 days?

With all due respects, at the behest of the civilian leadership, they've implemented some suboptimal rules of engagement for the troops. It's already led to some tragic outcomes in tactical situations. It appears to be a strategic blunder.
Comment: #4
Posted by: peter
Wed Jun 23, 2010 1:45 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Susan Estrich
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Tom Rosshirt
Tom RosshirtUpdated 26 May 2012
David Sirota
David SirotaUpdated 25 May 2012

12 Mar 2008 Getting Stupid

23 Apr 2010 The First Amendment and Animals

4 May 2012 John Edwards: Jerk or Criminal?