creators.com opinion web
Conservative Opinion General Opinion
Susan Estrich
10 Feb 2012
What Happened to Newt and Mitt?

Newt's easy. While all of us on the Democratic side were playing "root for Newt," Republicans were … Read More.

8 Feb 2012
Chasing Equality

Tuesday's ruling by a panel of three judges of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit … Read More.

3 Feb 2012
Primary Purposes

If the goal of the primary process is simply to nominate a candidate, essentially to nominate the man or … Read More.

The Lady and the Bracelet

Share Comment

We got to the airport two hours early. My daughter made fun of me. Maui is not a likely terrorist target. Then again, the president was about one minute away in Oahu, and so was Rush Limbaugh, so who's to say for sure? The thing about terrorists is that they strike when and where you don't expect them.

So we were fine. We had time to spare, while the old woman in front of us — and when I say old, I mean much older, like over-80 older — struggled with the clasp of her bracelet. I don't wear bracelets like that for just this reason, but she had a husband, and my guess is she doesn't travel much.

Unfortunately, the husband went through first, which may tell you something about life for the past 50 years. She was stuck on the other side with the bracelet stuck on her wrist. I have bad eyes. The woman next to me had bad nails. We all stood around.

They offered to screen her physically, or whatever you call it, “to get the wand,” but she kept saying she was sure she could get the bracelet, that it must be the clasp. And as we stood, trying and failing, the line backed up and I tried to smile, and people way behind me started wondering, I'm sure, whether a man on a one-way ticket from Nigeria with no luggage was holding up the line.

He wasn't. Just the older lady with the gold bracelet and the sticky clasp and the husband on the wrong side of the divider. She was finally rescued by a tattooed hipster whose many piercings plainly led to a greater familiarity with all forms of jewelry fasteners than the rest of us.

What a complete and total waste of time. Was there one person in the universe who thought the woman in the wheelchair was a terrorist? Could there possibly be anybody else in that line — say, someone whose father tried to tell us that he had been radicalized, someone about whom the British knew enough to deny a visa — who was deserving of our scrutiny?

I'm a liberal.

I'm a civil libertarian. But if the country were being threatened by middle-aged Jewish women, I'd open my purse and my pockets in a New York minute. It isn't. Nor is it being threatened by elderly ladies in wheelchairs. The frightening part of the latest directive adding to the list of those warranting special scrutiny individuals who either are from or have been traveling in countries known to harbor terrorists is not that it unfairly profiles, but that we haven't been doing that kind of screening up to this point.

Why not? Did we think folks traveling from the Middle East and East Africa were no more dangerous than those who hailed from Finland and Norway? Does anyone in their right mind think that young men who have recently visited from Yemen should be treated no different than old white ladies in wheelchairs?

We live in a dangerous world. We are not going to convince radicalized young men to put down their arms. The father who warned us about his own son understood it. The Jordanian doctor who was recruited to work with our intelligence officials and then turned into a suicide bomber proves it.

We can do everything reasonable to provide the security and stability that may reduce the attractions of radical ideology. But where it has already taken root, our only option is to root it out and destroy the threat. We will not do so successfully if we're all wasting our time fidgeting with the clasp of an antique gold bracelet.

To find out more about Susan Estrich and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM


Comments

5 Comments | Post Comment
Amen, Ms. Estrich! You said eloquently what I have thought for years, when travelling with my now 90 year-old father. He is a retired Marine veteran of three wars. He had the highest security clearance possible for over five years. Now, for whatever reason (two fake knees and a pacemaker, perhaps), he is subjected to what he calls a strip search every time he travels to the West Coast to visit my brother and his family. He finds the process so obkjectionable that he threatens never to do it again.
Let's wake up and use our common sense.
Thank you.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Sydney Olson
Wed Jan 6, 2010 7:56 AM
Good article. Now, how do we convince the rest of the loony left that not profiling 80 year old ladies is common sense? Can't be done!
Making air travel difficult is just another "crisis" and you know who likes them.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Early
Wed Jan 6, 2010 8:18 AM
Quick question; how many terrorists have been arrested and convicted since 9/11 from an arrest at airport screening? Answer; Zero. Why do we even bother? I can get in a car, on a boat, on a train, or on a bus and see no screening. Why do we as the American public put up with this worthless waste of money and pain? I am planing a visit to see my brother in Chicago this year. I would rather drive 2,100 miles and let my children see the great American Southwest, the Rocky Mountains, and the great plains, than put up with the pain of ineffective airport security. I can easily tell you six ways to blow up any aircraft in the US skies, and there is no way to stop any of them, and I am not a terrorist. So how many ways do you think that a terrorist can come up with?
Comment: #3
Posted by: red5mutual
Wed Jan 6, 2010 2:54 PM
Susan, your honest opinion. Where do you think this country is headed?
Comment: #4
Posted by: vonnie bates
Thu Jan 7, 2010 7:01 AM
But, Susan, we're not rooting out and destroying the threats against us when State Department officials have been told not to target people of Muslim faith and FBI officials don't even tell Army officials that an active duty major is in contact with a key jihadist imam. In the meantime, our president is apologizing for the Bush commitment by the US to root out terrorism and to punish those countries who harbor terrorists and support them. Bush got pushed by the libs to release GITMO prisoners back to Yemen and looked what happened. Yet Obama just released 6 more and plans to let many more dozens go. He'll push on lib issues but on national security, he acts like it's a low priority. BTW, in 10 days in Hawaii, Obama didn't even find the time to visit wounded Army troops. Again, priorities....
Comment: #5
Posted by: Lesley Barnard
Thu Jan 7, 2010 8:10 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Susan Estrich
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 13 Feb 2012
Joe Conason
Joe ConasonUpdated 11 Feb 2012
Mark Shields
Mark ShieldsUpdated 11 Feb 2012

13 May 2009 Funny and Not Funny

15 Aug 2007 Death Is Different

21 Mar 2008 TMI