Within an hour of the tragic shooting in Arizona, it had begun. The Blame Game. The effort to score political points.
The attacks on the ugliness of the political debate mimic the very ugliness they condemn.
The sheriff blamed Rush Limbaugh. Liberal bloggers went after conservative talkers. Conservative talkers lashed right back at the sheriff and the liberal bloggers. Drudge kept running the headline that the shooter was remembered by high-school acquaintances as a "liberal pothead."
My own rule of thumb, in the days since, is that anyone who is out there blaming someone else is probably equally to blame.
Obviously, the person to blame is the one who pulled the trigger. If, as all evidence suggests, that man was Jared Lee Loughner, then it is perfectly clear that the man to blame is a deeply disturbed, mentally ill, deranged individual who — in my book at least — knew what he was doing and knew that it was wrong. And that is all that is required to defeat an insanity plea and establish his responsibility.
He deserves a vigorous defense.
And if, as the evidence suggests, he is guilty, he deserves the ultimate penalty.
That is the easy part.
The hard part is what we do with it.
First and foremost, of course, we pray. We send our sympathies to the families of the victims. We take a moment — more, I hope — to hug our loved ones, count our blessings, cherish the privilege we have to live in a country where such an action is so unusual, so aberrant, as to stop us in our tracks.
Then what?
Do we use it?
Do we use the death of a 9-year-old child, of a respected federal judge, of a young congressional aide, to score points in a political debate?
Political discourse in America is a nightmare: vicious, ugly, mean-spirited and personal.
It wasn't always this way, but it is now. Sadly, it mostly serves the interest of those who engage in it. And it mostly works. And Tucson has made it worse, not better.
At a time when we need to be pulling together as a country, reaffirming our fundamental values, sending the message loud and clear to whack-jobs everywhere that violence has no place in American politics, we're head over heels in blaming each other.
I turn on the radio, and the left is blaming the right and the right is blaming the left.
Enough already. Stop. Shut up. A child is dead. A wonderful judge is dead. A congressional aide is dead. A woman saying hello to her congresswoman is dead. And more. And more injured.
I don't care who is to blame. If we cannot come together now, if we cannot say no to all the people who are playing this ugly game and have been for so long, if now is not the moment when we say enough, no more, it doesn't matter whether this shooter was from the left or the right, we need to stop playing with fire ... then what will it take?
To find out more about Susan Estrich and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.
Funny isn't it that when it is a crackpot liberal doing the damage all of a sudden blame is not an important issue. HYPOCRITE. Is it any wonder why mose rational people consider Democrats/Liberals as their enemies. They certainly do more damage than any Muslims has ever done to us.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Mark
Wed Jan 12, 2011 6:15 AM
Oh no Susan dear. The blame came from one side. The sheriff and the media tied this events to conservatives. They should e ashamed of themselves. Conservatives - just defended themselves. They blamed nobody for the events but this sick young man.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Lisa
Wed Jan 12, 2011 6:22 AM
One correction to an otherwise fair musing by Susan. The Right is not blaming the Left for the shooting. It is only pointing out the hypocracy and blatant opportunism of the Left.
Comment: #3
Posted by: KG
Wed Jan 12, 2011 7:03 AM
Conservatives on this board: Congratulations! You got what you wanted: "a second amendment solution." Now OWN IT. Furthermore, you should be kissing Susan's butt for offering you losers an olive branch -- she's a better person than me.
I'm a former soldier. I LIKE guns. I voted for W the first time and Dole before that. But you, my neocon friends, you with your crosshairs and crackpots -- you've moved so far away from reality that the nondelusional no longer recognize your "logic." And let's stop ignoring the obvious: Laughner's pothead friends identified him as a "liberal" because they didn't know the word "libertarian." This whack job's ideologies are clearly aligned with the Tea Bag Party. He singled out a Democratic congresswoman for assassination. That's what it really comes down to.
Susan, your message of moderation and decency is appreciated, though impossible for some of us to heed.
Comment: #4
Posted by: Honor Girl
Wed Jan 12, 2011 7:32 AM
Susan, it certainly appears to me that Hollywood and game makers who show murdering in all it glory. However, over the past 10 years I have seen more liberals and progressives talk about violence and it has been their followers who have commited the violence up to this point. Take a few minutes and review all that was stated about G.W. Bush from Hollywood, TV and radio talk shows Was this ever stated about Clinton, Carter, FDR in the strong and violence methods used by the MSM over Bush - I do not think so!
Blood Libel like the NYT screamed within hours of the murders and then echoed across all liberal TV and newspapers makes one want to see them all shut down as this was an act of one individual. I further question the intelligence of the Sheriff did not think crazy enough to take away his gun. The federal government should be doing a review of his conduct in this case, but, our President is out giving him platitude.
Comment: #5
Posted by: Gene44
Wed Jan 12, 2011 7:53 AM
And to what end does the Sheriff have to play in all of this? What was his agenda? Why did he immediately blame anyone or anything at his initial "post capture" press conference? Who was he to make false accusations without having interrogated his prisoner, conducting an investigation or complying with due diligence? How irresponsible was that?
Comment: #7
Posted by: Brent Rayban
Wed Jan 12, 2011 8:28 AM
No Liberal has yet admitted that the DLC used targets on maps in 2004, Obama himself said to bring a gun to a knife fight and referred to Conservatives as 'the enemy". Time for Liberals to get off their high horse !! The biggest problem Liberals have today is that voters are educated and stay up to date with who says what and who does what - no more hiding and distorting the facts to suit thier political agenda. That's why Liberals are trying to shut down FoxNews - they shine a light on things that Liberals don't want us to know about - like ACORN, Van Jones or companies and unions getting waivers for Obamacare.
Comment: #8
Posted by: MA Tom
Wed Jan 12, 2011 11:42 AM
I think that what happens reflects the kind of education our school systems and colleges are producing. The student is not given any political education based on facts but on what the teacher believes. As a result the student gets an early biased on things and is not able to decipher what what he sees and reads.
Comment: #9
Posted by: Dick
Wed Jan 12, 2011 12:24 PM
Comment #8 is right on. We are journalisticly burdened with a media rife with social,progressive hacks carrying the water for Obama, while he sits back and observes the political, feeding, frenzy he has created with his class warfare objectives,distaste for American culture and accomplishments, blatant mispeak of the value of Muslim culture over the core beliefs of this American Society,which is still unsure of his legal stature in same as evidenced in his personal stealth program to hide key pieces of his personal,academic, religious, and ideological background. However, tonight at 8:00 P.m. ,he will unleash his usual oratorical blatherings, praise the victims,highlight the heroic individuals, and impart(His word for talking down to us) as to how we should intellectually process this incident and as usual leave us with the empty feeling of(Who was this Masked Man) that cannot come even close transcend the image of coldness, robotic and feigned emotionalism, in a horrific situation such as this. That is the present seed for hate amongst most Americans. This man is an impostor as President as well as being an invader of once what was a great America. The left continues to carry his banner irrespective of the danger signals he sends. That banner will be justifiably struck down in coming elections as will the standard bearers. No civil discourse will be apparent until that is accomplished.
Comment: #12
Posted by: Kevin McGinty
Wed Jan 12, 2011 4:41 PM
You write and I quote "Political discourse in America is a nightmare: vicious, meanspirted, ugly and personal".
Duh, didn't you engage in this same sort of thing when you were Gov. Michael Dukakis's campaign manager???
Haven't I read extremely biased columns in this, your column?? Don't you socialize with the same Liberals who constantly belittle Abortion opponents, scream about Gun Control after each mass murder! Duh!!!
Nuff Said...Dennis
Comment: #13
Posted by: Dennis
Wed Jan 12, 2011 5:04 PM
My concern is not even the overheated rhetoric coming from the Left, eagerly trying to paint the Right as somehow responsible for this horrific act of violence. I couldn't care less if the media talkingheads think Sarah Palin or the Tea Party or anyone else associated with their views is somehow responsible for driving that young man to kill those people. I know the charge isn't true, so they can pound sand.
My concern is that left-leaning politicians will use this as an excuse to crack down on private gun ownership or impose additional restrictions on firearms - never mind that new laws wouldn't have stopped this from happening. A bill will be introduced in the House as soon as Monday, a similar one by Frank Lautenberg in the Senate, additional noises in the Senate about trying to bring back the useless "assault weapons" ban which expired in 2004, and there are angry calls from the local and state level (especially NY mayor Michael Bloomberg) as well. Along the way, a lot of misinformation is being thrown around, including the ever-present confusion between a magazine and a clip. The politicians can't even get that one right.
That's what scares me - that the rest of us are about to get punished because one whackjob decided to hurt innocent people. I'm sick and tired of paying the price for other peoples' criminal acts, and equally tired of the asinine idea that guns aren't already regulated enough or that criminals and the insane will obey them.
Comment: #14
Posted by: Matt
Wed Jan 12, 2011 11:31 PM
re: Honor Girl. I'm very disappointed in you. A former military member really ought to know better than to go around calling people "tea baggers" because they want lower taxes and smaller government.
Disgusted, actually.
Comment: #15
Posted by: Matt
Wed Jan 12, 2011 11:32 PM
Re: Matt
Alas, if lower taxes and smaller government were really what the Baggers were about! Any party that aligns itself with birthers, racists, and proponents of armed revolt - in AMERICA - against WHAT? -- is a joke. A sad, sad joke. Even the tagline, "Take America Back!" is disturbing. From whom are they taking it? OTHER AMERICANS?! This is not what I raised my right hand for. This is not what my grandfathers died for. These people HATE America, because it isn't what they want it to be.
I wish some of the ignorant people on this board would spend a little time overseas. They might discover they don't have much to complain about. I am absolutely disgusted with the escalating level of vitriol and frankly, expect further violence from the right. Not that those on the far end of the spectrum aren't just as nuts -- but we lefties, after all, don't usually own guns.
Comment: #17
Posted by: Honor Girl
Thu Jan 13, 2011 8:17 AM
As a very conservation individual, I do agree with you. However I also agree that this has been extreme leftists castigating all conservatives, including the sheriff.
I believe that there is more of a problem in programming on television, video games, popular music in creating an atmosphere of violence, rudeness, abusive language and thus popularization of the vileness in our society.
I am not calling for censorship. I am calling for the media industry to reach for a higher level than how they can make an easy buck.
I once heard a psychologist state, on a college campus. "There is only one difference between patients in mental institutions and 10% of the population walking the streets in any city. He didn't finish the statement, but he didnt need to.
Comment: #19
Posted by: Ron Kohl
Thu Jan 13, 2011 2:36 PM
Dear Ms. Estrich, I read an abbreviated form of your piece this morning in the paper and I loved it. Thank you.
I've been trying to ignore all the name calling but it's difficult and depressing. Assassinations and murderous rampages used to bring us together, at least for a few days. They do so no longer, it appears.
PS: I posted a link to your article on my FB page because I had been reading so many nasty posts about the shootings the past few days. Unfortunately every response to your story has been hostile, and I'm afraid all of them came from "progressives." (Apparently I have no conservative or independent friends, or they just didn't bother to respond.) I think you've definitely hit a raw nerve and the moral for you may be "no good deed goes unpunished." :-)
Comment: #20
Posted by: Owen Jones
Thu Jan 13, 2011 3:08 PM
What happened in Arizona was a tragedy. That is the only point that needs to be made. It was a tragedy caused by hatred. The vitriol tossed about in some of the responses to this post is equally tragic.
<<@ Kevin - "This man is an impostor as President as well as being an invader of once what was a great America."
@ MA Tom - "That's why Liberals are trying to shut down FoxNews - they shine a light on things that Liberals don't want us to know about - like ACORN, Van Jones or companies and unions getting waivers for Obamacare. "
@ Mark - "Is it any wonder why mose rational people consider Democrats/Liberals as their enemies. They certainly do more damage than any Muslims has ever done to us."
@Lisa - "Conservatives - just defended themselves. They blamed nobody for the events but this sick young man.">>
No, you do not believe that. It is not true, and you know it is not true. As another columnist said, "And if my grandmother had wheels, she'd be a wagon."
As for our President's speech, these are the words I remember: "Imagine -- imagine for a moment, here was a young girl who was just becoming aware of our democracy; just beginning to understand the obligations of citizenship; just starting to glimpse the fact that some day she, too, might play a part in shaping her nation's future. She had been elected to her student council. She saw public service as something exciting and hopeful. She was off to meet her congresswoman, someone she was sure was good and important and might be a role model. She saw all this through the eyes of a child, undimmed by the cynicism or vitriol that we adults all too often just take for granted.
I want to live up to her expectations. I want our democracy to be as good as Christina imagined it. I want America to be as good as she imagined it. All of us -– we should do everything we can to make sure this country lives up to our children's expectations."
Comment: #21
Posted by: Deborah Laymon
Fri Jan 14, 2011 6:35 AM